Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hiya all,

about 5 months ago I bought my first stagea. it's a 2001 M35 300RX (VQ30DD) with 70,000Km down, as I understand it you still can't get this model through compliance in Australia, too bad really it makes a great middle ground between the 250RS and the VQ25 turbo model.

I'm a design engineer by trade based in Auckland so I'm the sort of guy who likes to pull things appart and fix my own problems before I take anything to a mechanic.

So far I've found one or two issues with my wagon and managed to fix them in the shed. I'm keen on learning more about these wagons and sharing my own experiences of living with and maintaining my ride.

DSCF0230.jpg

DSCF0231.jpg

Edited by chad bob
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/
Share on other sites

It's my long lost twin!!!!!

I'm the black sheep of the family, I've got the 250t RS :)

Give me the option between the 3L and the 2.5L turbo and I'll take the turbo everytime, can't wait to high-flow!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4697742
Share on other sites

It's my long lost twin!!!!!

I'm the black sheep of the family, I've got the 250t RS :P

Give me the option between the 3L and the 2.5L turbo and I'll take the turbo everytime, can't wait to high-flow!!

Heh, yours does look like the evil twin with that body kit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4697821
Share on other sites

Are you jealous Cam? Aero kit rules.

Chad, I bet its cheaper to run than our turbos.

It might be.

-On long cruises with only a couple of hills and me in 'cruise mode' it gets 8-9L/100km

-This weekend I drove up north, I was in 'lets just f***ing get there' mode and there were a lot of slow buggers around on steep windy roads so a lot of foot flat up hill passing (these VQ30's actually get up and go rather nicely) fuel usage = 12-13L/100km

-Around town commuting to work etc I get 10-11L/100km

Compared to a stock 250TRS the seat of the pants meter tells me that the VQ30DD isn't really that far behind on the performance scale they get to 100KPH in about 7.5Seconds, what does the VQ25DET do the ton in?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4698038
Share on other sites

I timed mine with the I phone :P

6.5 sec is rather impressive for a big wagon,

my major gripe with the VQ30DD is that it has little torque below 3000RPM, the VVT kicks things up at 3000RPm and then you start going, but I found that the VQ25DET has balls from early in the rev range, big bonus.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4698055
Share on other sites

Are you jealous Cam? Aero kit rules.
+1 on aero kits ruling. i think he is jealous :P

Hahaha! No, not jealous guys... Just thought that Stephen might bite first...

Compared to a stock 250TRS the seat of the pants meter tells me that the VQ30DD isn't really that far behind on the performance scale they get to 100KPH in about 7.5Seconds, what does the VQ25DET do the ton in?

On a good day - 6 flat.

On a not-so-good day - nearly 7.

I really have to get my intake & dump sorted

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4698064
Share on other sites

I think VQ30 and VQ35's are only differentiated by the Direct Injection heads on the VQ30 and the extra stroke length of the VQ35. The bore dimensions are the same on both motors.

I think the VQ25 has a smaller bore and stroke than the larger motors.

In the future I want to put a VQ35 intake on my motor and also some aftermarket VQ35 headers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4698084
Share on other sites

i saw your post about the Di motors and lacking performance. i should suggest something in that thread. i had a thought!

Sounds good, write it up in my Di motor thread, I'd be glad for any thoughts.

Nope.

VQ25 - Bore 85mm Stroke 73.3mm

VQ30 - Bore 93mm Stroke 73.3mm

VQ35 - Bore 95.5mm Stroke 81.4mm

Crap! I thought that the 30 and 35 had the same bore with a longer stroke, ah well not that it matters.

Edited by chad bob
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4698109
Share on other sites

I timed mine with the I phone :P

6.5 sec is rather impressive for a big wagon,

my major gripe with the VQ30DD is that it has little torque below 3000RPM, the VVT kicks things up at 3000RPm and then you start going, but I found that the VQ25DET has balls from early in the rev range, big bonus.

the VQ25DET starts building boost at around 2000rpm (well thats when its noticeable - ie. when you feel it) and from there it accelerates pretty rapidly. The revs would also build up slightly quicker at that point. I like to describe the power delivery of the VQ25DET as "ferocious" although that may be overstating it just a little ;)

Even though there is a small difference in reported power between the two engines (191kw vs 206? kw) the difference in peak torque is much greater (325N-m vs 407N-m). Interestingly the VQ30DD almost has as much power and torque as the RB25DET NEO - just shows you how far technology has progressed in just a few years.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277904-my-first-stagea/#findComment-4698185
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...