Jump to content
SAU Community

Josh's 32 4 Door #2


Recommended Posts

Geaz. its been a while since iv been in here!

Well, some of your may remember my old 4 door.

Image014-1.jpg

Well i picked up another one now. Nice and clean.

1.jpg

4.jpg

5-1.jpg

Iv only had it for 3 weeks now. So far this is what i have done;

Engine

RB20DET

Greddy Intercooler kit

3in Turbo back exhaust

Twin 2.5in Straight Pipes

Pod

3 Puk brass button Clutch

KTS Short Shifter

Suspension

Cusco Coilovers

R33 LCA

Kazarma Adjustable Castor Rods

KTS Lock Spacers

KTS Cradle lock Bushes

F&R Cusco Strut Braces

Project Mu Handbrake Shoes

S14 5 bold Welded Diff

Solid G-Box mount

Wheels

R32 GTR Wheels

looking to get some Work XD9's or Hyper CST - Zero 1's. Something along that lone

Body

Stock atm

Interior

OMP Deep Dish Wheel

Bride Brix Seat

GTR Dash (old one was cracked)

Edited by Lock_to_lock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, was a hard choice to sell the 100. When you have such a nice car, its hard to really enjoy it because you care so much. Thats why i went back to the 32. I can have a stack of fun in it and parts are everywhere. When i find a good set of wheels, should look dope aswell lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...