Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day guys, I'm looking to upgrade my brakes and I was wondering what would be suitable for my needs. I have a Series 2 R33 GTS-T with stock rotors and calipers. I'm looking to get my car up to about 300rkw and so I thought it would be wise to do my brakes first. I'm trying to decide if I should get new Rotors or a Full brake kit. If I go for new brakes, I'd like to keep it under 2k, but if new rotors will do me fine, that would be great.

Alternatively, I was also looking at finding myself a set of GTR calipers and buying some new groved/dimpled rotors to suit.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/278377-new-rotors-or-full-brake-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Hi mate, i have a R33 with 245rwkw and i do a fair bit of track work on semi slicks as well as street driving on regular tyres.

My brakes consist of Slotted front and rear rotors, MOTUL RBF600 brake fluid (think thats what its called), Race brakes RB74 pads front and back, braided brake lines, and a brake master cylinder stopper.

These are more than adequate for my track days and the car pulls up extremely well time and time again with close to no brake fade. I am generally quite hard on brakes so they do cop a good beating. Sure the brakes dont look HUGE behind the wheels but they sure do get the job done.

Total price for this would be well under 2 grand for everything fully installed.

Hope that helps.

Yeah I had a similar set up to Andy, but had 10 more rwkw :D:laugh:

What size wheels are you running?

If you are running 16's, you are limited to what sort of rotor size upgrades.

I had DBA 4000 all round, QFM pads, braided lines, martini dot5 fluid and lost count how many supersprints and hillclimbs I did in it, and this was a pretty good package for my limited budget and I was running r32 gtr wheels

Another bloke, Ryan (boz22n on here) has more power than andy and me, but runs 17" wheels and has the GTR rotors and brakes AFAIK

Step 1: Good high temperature pads and fluid (FWIW i'm using EBC yellows and Motul 600)

Step 2: Get some rotor/caliper cooling/ducting at the front

And only if that doesnt get you where you need to be;

Step 3: Upgrade the fronts. Probably a wank if you're using street tyres, but i love the pedal feel with the G4 330mm kit (which was $2000). Needs 17in rims.

Braided lines and master cylinder stopper will improve pedal feel, but not help you stop any sooner.

Very much depends whether you track your car or if it's street driven. On the street it's pointless upgrading brakes. 100km/h in a 300rwkw car isn't any faster than 100km/h in a 100rwkw car.

If you hit the track though...well it is definitely worth upgrading...better than purchasing engine modifications as far as trimming lap times. As has been said, alot of people tend to forget that tyres are part of the braking system too. If you are braking traction / engaging ABS with your current tyres and the stock brakes...upgrade your tyres.

tyres contribute heaps! the stopping power is far greater.

ive got a 33 gtst with lucas pads, stopper, lines and motul rbf600 fluid and by far the federal 595rs have made the car stop faster than all the

others. need some ducts next, they hold pretty well in a 15min session, but always want more.

pads are only $70 a pair and last 3-4 track days.

Thanks guys, Have not taken her to the track yet, but i'm very keen on the idea. The car is still fairly stock atm, but I am in the process of upgrading. Currently sitting in the garage jacked up waiting for the new parts. I'm running on 17s atm. Will be looking at looking at new tyres very soon as well. Current set are getting pretty bald.

Hey Adam, how well would you rate the G4 kit? Do you really think its worth it, or will the stock callipers with new rotors do just as well.

Anyone used the D2 Kit?

How well do people rate the GTR Calipers? Are they any better/worse than say a new G4 or D2 kit?

Cheers

On the R33GTST I have a set of UAS caliper adaptors with 324mm DBA 5000 series rotors. For the road I use Hawk HPS pads and for the track Hawk HT10's. It also has a pair of UAS air deflectors on the radius rods. No fade, no noise and easily out brakes the tyres, road or track (R type).

Cheers

Gary

Hey Adam, how well would you rate the G4 kit? Do you really think its worth it, or will the stock callipers with new rotors do just as well.

Anyone used the D2 Kit?

How well do people rate the GTR Calipers? Are they any better/worse than say a new G4 or D2 kit?

Do a search - the G4 kit has been discussed a lot (i like it a lot for the money). The G4 and D2 kits appear to come off the same production line.

I went from the Sumitomo GTR caliper with adapter and 324mm rotor to the G4 330mm kit and the pedal feel was a lot better. The pad is a fair bit bigger as well.

FWIW The 32 GTR rotors are 296x32 the 33 GTR rotors are 324x30 and the G4s are 330x32.

Also the DBA4000s have failed for many on the track (search for it) so avoid them unless they've fixed the slot design.

I think they must have fixed them Adam,

Quite a few of us ran them doing 1.13's and quicker at wakie and with no issues at all - over the 3.5 years of owning my r33 I only replaced them once due to wear and tear!

I went from the Sumitomo GTR caliper with adapter and 324mm rotor to the G4 330mm kit and the pedal feel was a lot better.

Most pedal feel comes from the brake fluid condition and the pad compound, very little from the caliper itself. So the obvious question, where you using the same pad compund in both sets of calipers? If not, then the pedal feel comparison is meaningless.

The pad is a fair bit bigger as well.

But is it a unique shape where high quality pads aren't available?

That's the advantage of the Sumitomo caliper, there is pretty much every pad compound ever made available for them from every major pad manufacturer.

Also the DBA4000s have failed for many on the track (search for it) so avoid them unless they've fixed the slot design.

Mostly rears from memory. I use 5000 Series on the front for their lighter weight and superior ventilation provided by the separate alloy hats. But I still have 4000 Series on the rear and I haven't cracked a set in over 10 years of using them on all sorts of cars.

Cheers

Gary

I decided to go with the sumitomo callipers and adapters on 324mm discs.. but the bloody things wouldn't fit under my 17" gmax rims.. threw on a set of standard 32 296mm slotted discs with a1rm pads. Feels a hell of a lot better than before anyway but will see when I finally get it out onto a track and play.

324mm DBA4000's on front with 33 calipers (using adapter brackets), Ferodo DS2500 pads, braided lines, master cyl. stopper.

Stops on a dime, even for street driving the extra confidence of the bigger brakes is great.

Most pedal feel comes from the brake fluid condition and the pad compound, very little from the caliper itself. So the obvious question, where you using the same pad compund in both sets of calipers? If not, then the pedal feel comparison is meaningless.

I tried DS2500 and DS3000 on the sumitomos, and the pedal felt about the same (and the lines are braided). I've used the "street" G4 pads and EBC yellows with the G4s and they both felt about the same and a lot better. I bleed regularly, so i dont think there would have been much difference there, tho it is possible. Same fluid both times. The caliper just seems more rigid in the G4, but that could be my imagination. When i say pedal feel i'm not talking about how much pressure it takes to cause braking (which will be dependent on pad mu) but how the far the pedal falls when under force, so maybe i'm using the wrong term?

But is it a unique shape where high quality pads aren't available?

That's the advantage of the Sumitomo caliper, there is pretty much every pad compound ever made available for them from every major pad manufacturer.

Not true, the pad is almost identical to AP pads, just need a little bit of grinding of the backing plate to make it sit well.

Mostly rears from memory. I use 5000 Series on the front for their lighter weight and superior ventilation provided by the separate alloy hats. But I still have 4000 Series on the rear and I haven't cracked a set in over 10 years of using them on all sorts of cars.

Mine were the fronts and i thought from memory that the fronts were the issue. A read of the thread will confirm/deny. The fact that they all failed in the same manner along a slot that uses an orientation that's unique to DBA is a fairly strong indication that the design is flawed.

I tried DS2500 and DS3000 on the sumitomos, and the pedal felt about the same (and the lines are braided). I've used the "street" G4 pads and EBC yellows with the G4s and they both felt about the same and a lot better. I bleed regularly, so i dont think there would have been much difference there, tho it is possible. Same fluid both times. The caliper just seems more rigid in the G4, but that could be my imagination. When i say pedal feel i'm not talking about how much pressure it takes to cause braking (which will be dependent on pad mu) but how the far the pedal falls when under force, so maybe i'm using the wrong term?

Your terminology is OK, it's the common use meaning

The pad operating temperature has a noticeable effect on the feel, if they are not hot enough and/or too hot then the pedal feel will be compromised. That's why back to back with the same pad compound is the only true test. A simplistic Mu at one single temperature tells you nothing about how a pad performs at all temperatures

Personal feel is realy too imprecise and often affected by placebo, "they cost a lot so they must be good". My testing process is simple measurement, measure the spread of the calliper when braking force is applied to the pedal. I've carried out that sort of comparison a number of times and the standard Sumitomo calliper comes out very well against all sorts of opposition. It's not until I get to the serious race callipers from AP etc that there is any difference that would be revealed by a simple pedal feel test.

The nest test is pad wear rates, if the pads are wearing unevenly then that is a sign of flexing callipers and.or mounts. I have easily had 30 plus sets of pads through numerous standard callipers and never once had any noticeable pad taper or any other symptom of calliper flex.

When chasing pedal feel in an R32/33/34 the first thing needed is a master cylinder brace, then braided lines, then pad compound, that's where the big gains are to be had. Chasing pedal feel with a calliper upgrade is not good value for money

Not true, the pad is almost identical to AP pads, just need a little bit of grinding of the backing plate to make it sit well.

I didn't say it was, note the wording (ie; "is it") and question mark at the end of the sentence

But is it a unique shape where high quality pads aren't available?

I was asking a question and the answer would appear to be no, it doesn't use an off the shelf common pad because you have to modify them.

Mine were the fronts and i thought from memory that the fronts were the issue. A read of the thread will confirm/deny. The fact that they all failed in the same manner along a slot that uses an orientation that's unique to DBA is a fairly strong indication that the design is flawed.

Some people have had problems and some haven't, we have run DBA rotors for the last 3 Bathurst 12 Hour races, class 1st and 2nd this year, and not had a problem. If there was design flaw then it most surely would have shown up with that sort of treatment. For me the fact is we know how to treat rotors and we don't have problems, so I can draw no other conclusion than they crack when mistreated.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
    • Yes correct. Also, I'd avoid applying it to soft paint (however I doubt you'll ever have to deal with it in practice). So any paint that hasn't fully hardened, could be a 1k paint that never fully hardened or it could be a 2k paint that was laid down thick and hasn't yet fully hardened. 
    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
×
×
  • Create New...