Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Um you do know that the sierra is a ford yes??

and also FIA Group A finished around the same time, and so did the Japanese Group A series.

So why would Australia run with a series that was Null and void world wide with no more factory support, From BMW, Nissan, Ford / Cosworth, Mazda etc

Also If you take note of that 92 Bathurst race it was the FORD Sierra fans Booing because if the race wasnt counted back a Sierra would have won.

Soooooo..... Kindly leave your "skylines are the best car ever built" Persona at the door Because These dinosaur bogan Taxis are quite a few seconds a lap faster than the GTR ever was....Not to mention the little 2L rear drive FORD Sierras still owned the GTR in outright straight line speed.

Thanks Kbaibai

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Um you do know that the sierra is a ford yes??

Yes, but that's like saying that an Lingenfelter is a Chevrolet, AMG is a Mercedes and an Alpina is a BMW. Technically, yes they are. The only difference is that the tuning arms have had their hands in improving on the base platform. Different suspension, driveline, engines, etc.

Did you also know that Cosworth play with aircraft, yachts, and defence to name a few, and also vehicles such as Aston Martin, Subaru, and Mitsubishi?

Soooooo..... Kindly leave your "skylines are the best car ever built"

Did I say that? I've gone over may statement a few times now and I don't see that anywhere.

Soooooo..... Kindly leave your inane comment at the door.

Yes, but that's like saying that an Lingenfelter is a Chevrolet, AMG is a Mercedes and an Alpina is a BMW. Technically, yes they are. The only difference is that the tuning arms have had their hands in improving on the base platform. Different suspension, driveline, engines, etc.

Did you also know that Cosworth play with aircraft, yachts, and defence to name a few, and also vehicles such as Aston Martin, Subaru, and Mitsubishi?

Did I say that? I've gone over may statement a few times now and I don't see that anywhere.

Soooooo..... Kindly leave your inane comment at the door.

Consider it left :)

You're right you didnt say it I just assumed you were another one of those GTR fan boys still living in 1992, my bad :blush:

Also a random fact - the Gibson GTR's used Cosworth pistons

for starters....have a look at how quick a porshe is...they basicly dominate the nurburgring 24hr

and the GTR wasnt banned...Group A Ended

ok ok.. grp a ended.. it ended because the gtr basically won every race it ever started... as for saying its the best car... it was in its time... r33 was a lemon compared to its competitors yet faster than the r32 and the r34 was a bigger lemon yet even faster than the old r32... they werent allowed to progress like the rest of the world.. but now they have no agreements to hold them back.. we shall see how dominate they can and use to be.

theres a reason why it was given that nickname u know.. and it wasnt because it was "slow" it was because it annihilated its opposition

anyway back on topic... blue r32... wouldnt know.. not in nsw but a nice read nontheless :blush:

Grp A ended because of cost, not because of the GTR.

The death of Grp A really started with the Sierra and their monster turbo's. Nissan then went one better and added AWD.

For the other manufacturer's to keep up would've meant massive investment as the majority had no turbo or AWD experience. So you would have pretty soon had a Sierra v GTR series rather than Supercars, and we'd all be complaining that, that was a boring 2 car series :-)

Look up the budget of the Gibson boys compared to 99% of the rest of the Grp A field. They were spending fists full of dollars more than anyone else.

Yeah def agree with you there NISMO

Id hate to think how much Nissan spent to develope the 32 to specificly win Group A, Its a shame really as I still think a Group A / C format would be the best series ever, how ever there wouldnt be many manufacturers willing to delelope a Group A style car for the road these days. The cost to build a road going race car would be unbelievable, The porka GT3 is what 250k? and thats about the only real "production" race car around, The new M3? meh too much of a luxury road car these days, same with HSVs Fords etc and Toyota and Mazda have ZERO in the way of cars that could be raced.

I wouldnt mind seeing a Group C style series where the current crop of V8 supercars go up againts the likes of an M3 GTR Porsche GT3 RSRs etc, The local cars would probly get spanked under their currents rules but It wouldnt be hard to make them competitive.

that is very true.. they killed the motorsport.. which meant.. the gtr pretty much ended the sport... oh well shit happens

now that everyones advanced pretty much equally, we shall see whos the best again.. porsche have been for a very long time now :)

Yeah, I think Grp A has probably been one of the best formats to date. The problem is that the exact rules which made it great, also killed it.

(no caps on development types and spend) I mean even F1 has limits to what you could do, where as Grp A really didn't. Rules were only introduced after a car would come out and smash everything ;-)

The current FIA GT series is probably as close as you could get to a replacement and you can see by they're rules that they learnt from Grp A. ie no AWD.

Other than that you have showroom series' which i like as well, but think the Aus rule of a price limit is silly. Let all comers race and simply have different categories like they do.

Yeah the showroom series is one of the most boring things I have ever seen....been that they have to be currnt model cars...so no real development is allowed because as soon as you start getting somwhere with the car its inelligable because its too old.

FIA GT is good...but not much of the production car left there

I would have love to have seen where group A went if it kept going, beingn that Fords AWD Escort Cosworth was just around the corner along with the R33 GTR and FD3s RX7 and the JZA80 Supra...would have made it interesting thats for sure

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...