Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Last weekend I removed my standard gtr camshafts and replaced them with a set of 260 poncams on my rb30dett. I have them at 0 inlet 0 exhaust at the moment. The power delivery is ok, but definately better with the standard gtr cams. I also cannot get it to idle anymore with it hunting back and forth 200rpm then eventually stalling, is it normal to loose the ability for it to idle?

I know that a tune will more than likely need to take place now, but just curious to see if people have had better success with these cams by dialing them in using a different setting other than 0,0?

How much is the tune dependant on taking advantage of the cams? I just want to know if there is anything I can do to improve response/idle without playing with the tune.

Basically my worry is that I will have to cough for another dyno run just to get my stable idle back, and I just don't know if the gains are going to be worth it, especially if the whole tune will need to be done again.

The tune I have now with the gtr cams is very good and somewhat refined now, it spat out 250rwkw on 14psi, and response was great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/278926-dialing-in-poncams-on-rb30dett/
Share on other sites

Yeah that's cool. I didn't think the change in 260's would be drastic enough to leave me with no idle but :D

Makes sense but all the same.

Ill just leave them at 0,0 and get another tune on it then. I searched yesterday and a couple of ppl had posted recommending +2 in -4 ex, so I thought it was worth asking.

Generally with Poncams the 0/0 ends up being the best all round position. The -2/+4 ends up with slightly more torque due to slightly more boost at slightly lower rpm. Note the multiple use of the word "slightly", it's generaly not dramatic, but it is noticeable. Of course you get nothing for nothing, you will sacrifice a slight (that word again) amount of top end.

Cheers

Gary

Generally with Poncams the 0/0 ends up being the best all round position. The -2/+4 ends up with slightly more torque due to slightly more boost at slightly lower rpm. Note the multiple use of the word "slightly", it's generaly not dramatic, but it is noticeable. Of course you get nothing for nothing, you will sacrifice a slight (that word again) amount of top end.

Cheers

Gary

Thanks for that Gary, info I was after.

Degreeing them properly would be a good start.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/De...ts-t240804.html

Please Paul, help me out here with what that actually achieves? I set the cams at a perfect 0 then I stick the car on the dyno and move the cam timing around till I get the desired result. So why does it matter where I started from (perfect 0) when all that I am interested in is getting the power curve on the dyno that I want? I can understand the process for a control engine, say Formual Ford or Formula 3, where it is important to precisely duplicate the desired cam timing. But the reason for spending time so much time and effort getting it perfect only to go and change it escapes me.

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...

Question directed at both Gary and Paul:

running a 25 head with custom grind non-VVT cams and hydraulic lifters

Is the process in dialing the cams in any different, or any more (or less) worthwhile than with solid lifters?

A mate suggested that the hydraulic setup introduces a level of imprecision not experienced once a solid setup is used. His suggestion is to follow the route advocated by Gary, while I'd steered towards making the adjustments while the engine is still on a stand and access easy.

As always it's a different path towards the same/similar end, but interested whether hydraulics tend to confound attempts to get them dialed in by conventional means.

Edited by Dale FZ1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...