Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Last weekend I removed my standard gtr camshafts and replaced them with a set of 260 poncams on my rb30dett. I have them at 0 inlet 0 exhaust at the moment. The power delivery is ok, but definately better with the standard gtr cams. I also cannot get it to idle anymore with it hunting back and forth 200rpm then eventually stalling, is it normal to loose the ability for it to idle?

I know that a tune will more than likely need to take place now, but just curious to see if people have had better success with these cams by dialing them in using a different setting other than 0,0?

How much is the tune dependant on taking advantage of the cams? I just want to know if there is anything I can do to improve response/idle without playing with the tune.

Basically my worry is that I will have to cough for another dyno run just to get my stable idle back, and I just don't know if the gains are going to be worth it, especially if the whole tune will need to be done again.

The tune I have now with the gtr cams is very good and somewhat refined now, it spat out 250rwkw on 14psi, and response was great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/278926-dialing-in-poncams-on-rb30dett/
Share on other sites

Yeah that's cool. I didn't think the change in 260's would be drastic enough to leave me with no idle but :D

Makes sense but all the same.

Ill just leave them at 0,0 and get another tune on it then. I searched yesterday and a couple of ppl had posted recommending +2 in -4 ex, so I thought it was worth asking.

Generally with Poncams the 0/0 ends up being the best all round position. The -2/+4 ends up with slightly more torque due to slightly more boost at slightly lower rpm. Note the multiple use of the word "slightly", it's generaly not dramatic, but it is noticeable. Of course you get nothing for nothing, you will sacrifice a slight (that word again) amount of top end.

Cheers

Gary

Generally with Poncams the 0/0 ends up being the best all round position. The -2/+4 ends up with slightly more torque due to slightly more boost at slightly lower rpm. Note the multiple use of the word "slightly", it's generaly not dramatic, but it is noticeable. Of course you get nothing for nothing, you will sacrifice a slight (that word again) amount of top end.

Cheers

Gary

Thanks for that Gary, info I was after.

Degreeing them properly would be a good start.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/De...ts-t240804.html

Please Paul, help me out here with what that actually achieves? I set the cams at a perfect 0 then I stick the car on the dyno and move the cam timing around till I get the desired result. So why does it matter where I started from (perfect 0) when all that I am interested in is getting the power curve on the dyno that I want? I can understand the process for a control engine, say Formual Ford or Formula 3, where it is important to precisely duplicate the desired cam timing. But the reason for spending time so much time and effort getting it perfect only to go and change it escapes me.

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...

Question directed at both Gary and Paul:

running a 25 head with custom grind non-VVT cams and hydraulic lifters

Is the process in dialing the cams in any different, or any more (or less) worthwhile than with solid lifters?

A mate suggested that the hydraulic setup introduces a level of imprecision not experienced once a solid setup is used. His suggestion is to follow the route advocated by Gary, while I'd steered towards making the adjustments while the engine is still on a stand and access easy.

As always it's a different path towards the same/similar end, but interested whether hydraulics tend to confound attempts to get them dialed in by conventional means.

Edited by Dale FZ1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah it factory manual not sure about ratio but it looks like there’s been some work at the rear 
    • so I need a new speedo cable 
    • Throwing my spoon to the soup here a bit.  When I installed a 044 back in 2012, along with the direct power mod, the car became very difficult to start. To a point I burned one starter motor as I was late for work and tried to get the thing going. With some tuning and careful use of gas pedal when cranking it became bearable. Trying to make this short as possible, but the 044 died after 2-3 years, after which I went with an AEM 320lph pump, which also died after about 4 years to my dismay. After that I went with a Nismo pump, and while trying diagnose an emissions problem, I noticed for the first time that my fuel pressure was 5bar/72psi on idle, and that removing the vacuum line did nothing. After monitoring the situation, and removing the direct power feed and going back to FPCM in attempts to remedy it, I noticed there was fuel in the pressure regulator vac line. Kept the FPCM, installed AEM external regu and the car became sooo much better in every way, including starting. And I had driven it like it was for 11 years.. Anyway, I agree these are likely two different problems, and the FP problem you just haven't noticed before. I do not know much about haltecs, but what first came to mind was the CAS, which probably is not there any more. So how is the wiring from haltec to gauge cluster? How is the battery voltage and alternator?
    • Your car was auto before? You have different diff ratio (auto vs manual i think? or n/a and turbo?)
    • +1 for getting a screen off alibaba, CarPlay/Android Auto is vastly better than whatever navigation cars had 10 years ago. I got an Android screen for my 2015 BMW, huge difference. Fully compatible with factory stuff including iDrive controls.
×
×
  • Create New...