Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wierd....can't find the story on any fairfax sites

It was on my SMH RSS feed, which is why I saw it...

but when I went to the link, the story was "not found".

would be nice if fairfax tried to squash the story ..

Edited by moneypit

Hahaha yes I would love to see this car crushed. Imagine the lawsuit it would kick up...

Can bet if it was an import it would be seeing the crusher - willing to bet they make exceptions for half million dollar exotics.

Hahaha yes I would love to see this car crushed. Imagine the lawsuit it would kick up...

Can bet if it was an import it would be seeing the crusher - willing to bet they make exceptions for half million dollar exotics.

regardless of how rare the car is it should still be crushed. if it was any one else then their car would be in the crusher!

well he doesn't own the car, so crushing is stupid as it only punishes the owner of the car, not the driver, so the people who are saying to crush it should grow a brain.

i'm guessing he will lose his job, not just because of the fact that he will lose his licence (high profile case so he will more than likely be made an example of) but because he has damaged the image of the business he works for, and also because the car was scheduled for reviews by other people during the week, so i'm guessing the company that owns the car will think twice about letting the financial review's motoring writers test any of their cars. they may even be able to take legal action against the driver, or the financial review if any of the other testers had paid money to test it.

Can bet if it was an import it would be seeing the crusher - willing to bet they make exceptions for half million dollar exotics.

I wouldn't be too sure on that one. Apparently half the impound yards are astons, GT3's etc taken off the midlife crisis set. I know they were hunting a GT3 in victoria for quite some time, don't know if they got him or not.

Don't tell us to grow a brain when we're clearly talking in hypotheticals here...I didn't think we'd have to acknowledge that the car isn't owned by the driver in order to make that joke.

I'm actually against car crushing full stop.

Also I think there's a difference between the impound yard and a car being crushed. Sure the impound yards might be full of exotics...but I'm saying once the cars are on death row, I think you'll find a double standard whereby some teenager's $15,000 import isn't blinked at whilst half a million dollars worth of exotic might be given a second chance. Would be interesting to know if there are exceptions for these types of cars or if the law is straight cut on the matter.

I wonder if they would crush it at all? Nothing like a pissed off company who stands to loose half a million dollars to fund a lawsuit challangeing the legality of car crushing...

Or maybe it wouldn't even get that far

In NSW they can only crush the car if it's owned only by the driver who committed the offence, that's why all of my cars are in joint names. Plus finance companies, including banks, have mounted legal arguments that their percuniary interests can't be put aside by the actions of a driver. That's why so few cars have actually been crushed.

Legally I would be very surprised if Ateco doesn't put forward a case to get their car back straight away. They shouldn't be commercially penalised for the actions of someone else.

Cheers

Gary

BTW; the alleged offence occured "in the West Australian wheatbelt"

well he doesn't own the car, so crushing is stupid as it only punishes the owner of the car, not the driver, so the people who are saying to crush it should grow a brain.

i'm guessing he will lose his job, not just because of the fact that he will lose his licence (high profile case so he will more than likely be made an example of) but because he has damaged the image of the business he works for, and also because the car was scheduled for reviews by other people during the week, so i'm guessing the company that owns the car will think twice about letting the financial review's motoring writers test any of their cars. they may even be able to take legal action against the driver, or the financial review if any of the other testers had paid money to test it.

+1. At least some speak sense

This was in WA so please stop trying to push your crapper eastern states hoon laws on us :)

I was surprised it was only seized for 7 days after the revised laws they brought in a couple of weeks ago (where apparently they changed it so they can be seized for 28 days for a first offence) but it seems they are only applying that to unlicensed drivers :)

A police spokesman said: "The incident should serve to remind drivers that regardless of a car’s capabilities, excessive speed is a contributing factor in about 60 people dying on our roads each year."

Lol so I wonder how many of those 60 people killed last year were hit by flying Ferrari's??

Give the Ferrari back to the owner, FFS it aint his fault. Poor guy. I don't understand these laws at all; some one gets done speeding in the car, so to punish them, they take the car away from the owner....

Stupid politics. If some one took my half million dollar Ferrari away i'd be on there door step with 50 lawyers demanding it back that minute.

Edited by PM-R33

Gotta love how they say " excessive speed is a contributing factor "

Note: Excessive speed does not necceserily imply driving over the speed limit

and I would love to now what "contributing factor" actualy means...

Also... a whole 60 ppl? as sad as it is, in reality it is a very small number...

A lot more people die from prety much anything else every year.

A lot more people get murdered every year yet we dont see any massive campaighns to fight that...

Now who would like to guess why that is?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's a huge reason manufacturers are tuning in dead flat torque curves... Make them reliable (and more drive able)
    • What HVAC actuator is under the steering wheel? Do you mean on the RHS of the centre console, immediately to the left of your shin? If so, then yes, it is probably that one, because that is the mode door actuator, and from what I know, it's still a pain in the arse to replace. I don't know about whole dash out, but you certainly have to rip into the centre console section. I don't know if it's covered in the workshop manual, as I haven't spent much time looking at those parts of it. (and by "the workshop manual, I mean the R32 GTR one, which is the most comprehensive one we have, and it should be similar enough between that and later cars to serve as a guide).
    • ...oops. forgot the TCU end...
    • No I got mine from a friend that had fabricated one … but I had to fit it to my setup which was a hks turbo setup. His was a Garrett -7. So one of my turbos was not a flange for one side … then I had a leak in the welds I had to find a weld shut … in the end the setup was decent priced but I spent a lot to get it fitted. A couple companies I checked would make it but you’re talking 7-9k aud with titanium. No joke mine was 6-7k even second hand after I had to fit it in Hong Kong … labour is expensive here. 
    • I'd just like to restate that I don't think anyone here is actually hating I recently sold a car part to a guy who was building a forged auto R34, with MV stall and aiming at ~450kw. I told him that I'm him, from the future and to stop after it explodes once. I told him I knew he won't listen the first time, and that's fine. But if my predictions do come true - Change direction faster than I did. I also said it's probably no coincidence that the dyno plot of a reliable turbo engine starts to look a lot like a N/A motor. :p
×
×
  • Create New...