Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok - Poll has gone pretty well - at least we have a starting point.

SAU Gaming Nights

Day: THURS 16 July

Start Time: 7pm

Games: CS:S & COD 4/5

CS:S Info

IP: 203.34.186.29:27075

P/W: Skyline

COD 4/5 Info

Not sure - anyone input? I don't have this game

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279127-sau-gaming-nights-are-here/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd actually have to d/l CS:S so probably won't bother. Installed COD4 over the weekend for a LAN so that's good to go. I suggest Gaming SA servers.

My internets have been getting worse due to a suspected degrading phone line, it will seriously drop out when the phone rings and that's ADSL 2 so I may be in and out as it were.

Vent?

I'd actually have to d/l CS:S so probably won't bother. Installed COD4 over the weekend for a LAN so that's good to go. I suggest Gaming SA servers.

My internets have been getting worse due to a suspected degrading phone line, it will seriously drop out when the phone rings and that's ADSL 2 so I may be in and out as it were.

Vent?

No worries, i assume you tried ripping out the phone to check? (could be filter related) ;)

Vent server - i still haven't had time to sort that out yet (im working 12hr shifts atm)... but CS:S has inbuilt so thats ok.

I do however have a free vent server if COD 4/5 do not have this feature... its just compressed a bit so a bit shit to hear people.

And thats provided no-one else is using it (as its not mine), so not 110% yet

server details? cant wait, what maps will we be playing? dust 2 and assult i say :)

CS:S details up tonight when i get in touch with my brother after he books it.

He'll be playing too so we can change maps etc etc whenever we want

CS:S Server details for tomorrow night

IP: 203.34.186.29:27075

P/W: skyline

:blink:

See people 7pm

We have a 15min break - times as follows (for booking), my bro accidentally did that, but he will try change

from 7-8:30 next is 8:45-10:15

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...