Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Tooo many haters on here.

Rohan, you just need to be smart about it dude. Decent boost controller and/or bleed valve to make sure it doesnt spike. Heat wrapping or turbo bag to protect from the heat of the turbo. Run good oil and fluids, but most importantly make sure you warm up and cool down your car properly.

You are getting towards the limit of your turbo with 1.3 bar, but if you do the small things there is no reason why you should enjoy many happy hours of drifting.

i think i might leave it @ 1 bar with no boost controller, and then hi flow it later and then put the 17psi spring setup in, to keep everyone here happy lol

on 1 bar it bogs sometimes, on 1.1bar it keeps spinning.. which is why i wanted to try it out... i wanna run boost off the gate thus i sold my boost controller...

Can you explain this for us Nismoid?

Boost is just a measure of the resistance of the head, for the shaft to spin quicker on an RB20 there must be less resistance...

I'm no RB20 expert, but what you're saying is the RB20 head flows better than the RB25 head?

If you have 12psi, do you think the turbo is spinning as fast as when its making 17psi?

Nope.

Kyebidz - a turbo beanie is the worst idea one could suggest, right up there with a Bee-r limiter!

Tthe hotter the housing and turbine wheel - the more prone to failure the exhaust wheel is going to be.

Stunn-R try getting a remap or an aftermarket ECU...

also, I think you're more suited on nissansilvia.

running 17PSI on a R33 Turbo, on a RB20 with stock AFM and stock injectors, you got to be kidding.

Is it me? or are there more nissansilvia kids on the SAU forum, some tool just posted this up "Blanking Off Bov" http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Bl...ov-t279384.html

If you have 12psi, do you think the turbo is spinning as fast as when its making 17psi?

Nope.

Depends how restrictive the head is?

That was kinda my point.

On the same motor, with the same head, with the same turbo and no change in restriction, then of course 17psi is going to require a faster shaft speed. If you were to port the head without touching the turbo, then you would see the same power with lower boost figures (it's about airflow, not "boost").

Boost is ONLY a measure of head restriction, not a measure of shaft speed. Comparing boost levels on different motors with different heads is pointless when trying to determine shaft speed.

lol johhny its not rohan haha

rohan doesnt have a 32 lol

come to a cruise or pm me your number and you canmeet me! i wanna see how keyboard warrioorrrrrRR you are in person lol

Run it at 18psi :iluvff: I had a series 1 25 turbo and ran it at 18psi for about 8 months and never had an issue with it. Even when I pulled the motor out I had a look at the turbo and it seemed happy.

But, if you cant afford to fix it if it does break, then run 12psi. Be smart about it :D

Kyebidz - a turbo beanie is the worst idea one could suggest, right up there with a Bee-r limiter!

Tthe hotter the housing and turbine wheel - the more prone to failure the exhaust wheel is going to be.

the sarcasm of his post must of been lost on you!

we got a neo turbo on a 20det . been thrashing it for ages on 14 psi . have had it glowing red after a boost round the hills . it seems to love it . it doesnt glow anywhere near as good as the 20 turbo used to . yeah not much piont in runnin any more on a stock ecu . but yeah your already pushin more yeah . good shit man . need more threads with "do ers " and not the hot air brigade

Depends how restrictive the head is?

That was kinda my point.

On the same motor, with the same head, with the same turbo and no change in restriction, then of course 17psi is going to require a faster shaft speed. If you were to port the head without touching the turbo, then you would see the same power with lower boost figures (it's about airflow, not "boost").

Boost is ONLY a measure of head restriction, not a measure of shaft speed. Comparing boost levels on different motors with different heads is pointless when trying to determine shaft speed.

Well generally people say the RB20 head is about 30% down on the 25 head.

12 + 3.6 = 15.6... 1.5-2.5psi off the target still

So i say higher shaft speed.

Well generally people say the RB20 head is about 30% down on the 25 head.

12 + 3.6 = 15.6... 1.5-2.5psi off the target still

So i say higher shaft speed.

So you agree that this statement:

i reckon you can run more boost through a 33 turbs on a rb20 compared to a 25 zebra so im gonna have to disagree with you there buddy :P

is absolute rubbish?

For a while there it seemed like you were trying to tell us that 15psi on an RB20 means higher shaft speed than 15psi on an RB25....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...