Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys,

Im still accumilating info and parts for my conversion and had a interesting thought at work today.

If I remember correctly, the GMS Bathurst GTR's ran a 9. something to 1 Comp ratio on mild boost.

Now,

From what I read, the 30det isnt a fan of smaller turbo's that choke them down restricting power at decent rpm.

The Bathurst cars, being twin turbo, in theory, there would be no/minimal restriction?

While trying to keep costs down, I would like to keep my current turbo setup (kkk k26 2770 with 42mm ext wastgate)

Turbo is rated at 330ps.

Would the larger size of the ext gate help with back pressure and restrictions?

How would it go with using the 9.1:1 CR pistons?

I can imagine it would be reasonably smooth power curve if it could still make power up top?

Thanks for your time again

Edited by works 510
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279494-high-cr-small-turbo-combination/
Share on other sites

Ok, this brings one guy to mind: "Al"

I drove his on a skidpan and quickly on the street, it was crazy quick, sure it doesnt have dyno winning figures but the way it makes usable power and torque it doesnt need huge power.

I can honestly say its the most fun GTST ive ever driven.

Hopefully he'll see this thread, if not, send him a pm - he's a really nice bloke :banana:

Al's turbo isnt a 330hp/ps turbo steve lol... Its a fair whack larger than that

The problem you'll have Dan is the turbine housing. It'll choke up very easily.

You could have a small turbo, no problem there - but the key is to have a larger rear housing - obviously not too large :banana:

Gate size is largely dependant on boost levels... id imagine to make any power on that little huffer your going to be running a fair bit of boost.

This will mean you want a smaller gate rather than a larger one for optimal boost control as most of the exhaust will go via the turbine housing to get turbo spinning up to speeds for the boost you need.

I don't think that compressor will have enough airflow to make meaningful boost at any decent rpm, after all 30 lbs per minute isn't whole lot. You can't just up the shaft speed as it physically won't handle it, plus it's just going to churn out hot air. Really it's too small a turbo for a decent 2 litre engine let alone a 3 litre.

Cheers

Gary

I had a 3071 based hiflow on my RB30det. it was built by sliding performance and made a shade over 250rwkw with boost tapering off after 4000. full boost was about 2400rpm and it hauled... no top and but for street use it was FANTASTIC!

never raced it but it was very fun to drive. it now has a dirty big holset hx35 strapped to the side of it and they are worlds apart. The hiflow I had used the stock rb25 housings and was really to small.

I'm running 9:1 comp on my rb30/26 with std cams and twins-5's and seeing about 14deg timing at peak torque at 12Psi of boost on pump. So by the time I get 20 psi of boost into the thing I think my peak torque timing numbers will be around 8degrees which will be close to the edge on pump. However the gains in using higher octane fuel will be huge!

I think with bigish cams (270 and 10.5mm lift) you could get 10:1 comp in fairly safely. Remeber the bore/stroke ratio of the 30 doens't lend it self to high compression in comparison to the 26 and 25.

  • 2 weeks later...

Dan..

empty your inbox mate. I cant send you a detailed reply to your question if I cant send it to you!

Go and delete some old PM's out of ya box mate.. then send me another PM to let me know that I can send you the info your after!

cheers mate

Aaron

i run a gt3076r on a stock internal 30 (refreshed) and its making boost at ~2000rpm and makes 1 bar (current boost setting) at 2800rpm, dont choke it too much it will just be a slug at anything over 4000rpm or so.

I put stock 26 twins back on the same motor and it was absolutely shocking and would struggle to rev out over 4500rpm, it was very very very bad to drive and was pretty much on boost just cruisin at 80kmh.

The 3076r is the smallest turbo i would personally use, there is no way anyone could say its too laggy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm hoping I just don't have to do an engine rebuild NOW. Doesn't mean I won't do it at some point. I think a plus point is that the car presumably ran on or close to stock power nearly all it's life so far. Only the Owner I bought it from actually increased power with a standalone ECU and blew the OEM turbos. And after it got thee 2860s it wasn't driven an awful lot either.   That is what I meant. With the twins coming on so late (4500-5000rpm) I hope the rods won't want to exit the block prematurely. And it still being a 26 means the torque curve isn't gonna hike up all that much.   It didn't blow up on the dyno when they tuned it to 500ish crank. So I suppose it'll be okay for now. They did put a Tomei head gasket on first though which did not seal at all, and they redid it with a Cometic one. Which I hope won't be my water leak.   Mainly anything oil. So far all it has is the N1 pump, oil restrictor and a filter relocation kit with a cooler.
    • 15000? ish? Something like that anyway. It wasn;t so much a wear as a tear that then spread. Might have lasted a lot longer if not bothered by just one incident, whatever it was. I took a punt. They are really comfortable and do a good job of holding. My daughter HATED it when I first put them in, and probably still does now. She has sensory issues and hates the way they are all up your business. I'm 197cm and 95kg. Not fat or particularly wide, and the XL size seat is the rigth fit. If I was any fatter it would start to get too snug. Any skinnier and you'd possibly want the smaller width.
    • Mrs rs focus came factory with recaro cs  sportsters in it and they a pain in the ass to get in and out of with the really high bolsters, once you were in them they were one of the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in
    • The NA 2.5 has very little torque. You won't feel much. Those trannies are also a million years old now and it could well be f**ked. First generation electronically controlled autos will often refuse to kick down, ete, etc, depending on what's wrong with them.
    • Yes, but no but yes but no. Those "it's fine up to 500HP" rules and everything else like it were all determined back when the cars were 10 years old. As they are now 30 years old.....what do you reckon the chances of something shitting the bed are? I'd say they are much higher now than they used to be. You might be lucky. You might be unlucky. Spin the wheel and find out. Yeah, nah. It's actually exactly the opposite. Making boost early and having heaps of torque able to be generated right in the middle of the rev range will do more to damage an engine than having to rev it high to make the power. Think about the load on the conrods, bearings, etc, to make 400HP at 4000 rpm, vs 400 HP at 6500 rpm. So someone has already "let the Nissan out" which is how we describe the increased chance of a fiddled with engine to have had something done wrongly. Many more engines that have been opened die than stock ones do - even if you into consideration how they are treated wrt power levels and the like. Again, not saying that yours will definitely have been put back together by a moron. But the possibility does exist. It's still a lottery. Spin the wheel. What weakspots?
×
×
  • Create New...