Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Sonic

Yep, Renault has a majority stake in them. Those "Bloody Euros" saved Nissan's arse BIG TIME

Yahoo news quote: "Shares of Nissan, owned 44.4 percent by France's Renault (RENA.PA), fell on the recall news. The stock closed down 0.73 percent to 1,221 yen after touching a high of 1,273 yen."

44.4% isn`t a majority share...

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It doesn`t matter if more Yanks are going to buy a V8 GT-R than a V6 Turbo one

you said that, so i thought you meant the V35 is a V8 as well as a V6 model, which was the impression i got from one news site. Oh well, it's late, forgive my dumb posts.

I said that about the Yanks because everybody in Australia seems to think that Nissan are develpoing a V8 for the next GT-R... which is *unsubstantiated* to say the least.

I only really like the Pontiacs over here because every Pontiac that my family or anyone I know has owned never screws up with them, they're great cars to have. At least, over here they are.

Sorry, I can't help but laugh every time someone calls us yanks 'cause when you live here only the people in New York are Yanks and everyone else is either rednecks, rebels, or punks, it's sorta funny but, that's another story. and, btw, here, everyone living in the south (alabama, mississippi, ect.) are hillbillies....Oz is south..which means.....:bahaha:

;)! lol

Actually, what that 44% stake DOESN'T include is the fact that Renault board members own shares in Nissan, bringing the total to almost 60% (something like 59.98%)

If Nissan's new GT-R isn't a Skyline (Ghosn's said that already), then it also might start it's own designation run... X35? P35? Who the fcuck knows until Nissan says it's the... (insert letter of choice here)35

As well as this, the talk of the previously-mentioned *and unsubstantiated* dry-sumped engine might be a bit premature... According to registration officials in England, there's no way you can get a dry-sumped car road registered for every day use. That removes the English market.

Over here (in Australia) it's also extremely difficult to pass ADR laws in all states with a dry-sump motor. America might be ok (what say ye incuboy?) but who knows....

There's only a few things that have been confirmed, one of which is that the designers are adamant the next GT-R will have 4 round tail lights.

Sorry for the long post. But we can't get wrapped up in hype. Now let's just all sit down with a big cup of cocoa and sing Kumbaya

Here in oZ the only real Australians are Aboriginal, the rest are foreigners living here. And America has been going down hill ever since it left the British Empire.

Exclusivity is not what Nissan need anyhow. They are in business to make money by selling cars, no other reason. The more cars they can sell, the better the profit.

The HRT427 was an exclusive car, only one ever built. You cannot get more exclusive than that. I doubt if that one car is going to keep Holden profitable all by itself though.

What are the technical reasons against a dry sump for road use and emissions ? I would really like to know.

Originally posted by Sonic

Actually, what that 44% stake DOESN'T include is the fact that Renault board members own shares in Nissan, bringing the total to almost 60% (something like 59.98%)

If Nissan's new GT-R isn't a Skyline (Ghosn's said that already), then it also might start it's own designation run... X35? P35? Who the fcuck knows until Nissan says it's the... (insert letter of choice here)35

As well as this, the talk of the previously-mentioned *and unsubstantiated* dry-sumped engine might be a bit premature... According to registration officials in England, there's no way you can get a dry-sumped car road registered for every day use. That removes the English market.

Over here (in Australia) it's also extremely difficult to pass ADR laws in all states with a dry-sump motor. America might be ok (what say ye incuboy?) but who knows....

There's only a few things that have been confirmed, one of which is that the designers are adamant the next GT-R will have 4 round tail lights.

Hey Sonic... it`s quite easy man, just listen:

1) I correct everyone whos calling *the current Skyline* an "R"35... which, if people would like to click their mouse a few times (or maybe type "Nissan" in Google search) they`ll find that sure enough, it`s a V35.

2) As regards the new GT-R, yes I agree, they *could* use a new designation for it, but as I`ve said 5,000,000,000 times now, don`t take what Ghosn says as gospel! If he says "the GT-R is going to be a whole new car and lose it`s connection with the Skyline name", then so what? How do you know he`s not just talking about markets other than Japan? One thing I DO do is refer ONLY to the Japanese market when I post up about Skyline/Skyline GT-R stuff mmmkay?

Which brings me to 3) Dry Sumps can`t be registered in the UK? ... and ....? This is not an issue in Japan. I`m not full bottle on the Dry Sump issue, but just because Dry Sumps can`t be registered in the UK (as you say) how do you know thats going to inhibit the GT-R from being sold there? Are you saying you took one look at the "dry sump diagrams" from the New GT-R thread, and thought it was BS coz of the UK registration problem?

I`m sticking to my guns guys, I know that there (of course) is a lot of tradition here in Japan, especially when it comes to cars. They aren`t just going to DROP the Skyline name from the GT-R because Ghosn thinks it`s a good idea. They aren`t just going to develop a new engine, and not take into the account the legality of it AFTER it`s finished (ie: dry sump).

Phhhew...

Originally posted by Mr. En One

Hey Rezz Man, Im with you .

When do you think we will be able to purchase GTR 35? i.e. when will they start selling them in Japan?

By all reports (and I talk to *Japanese* Industry guys too you know) the New GT-R was slated for a 8/2005 debut, but since the Tokyo Motor Show, it seems our man Carlos "Mr V8 R35 GT-R" Ghosn thinks it`s going to be 2007.

Theres a few things wrong with that. The V35 was released in 2001, and (as far as Ghosn is concerned) the GT-R variant will debut a full 6 years later? What, after the life cycle of the V35 is over?

Also, deferring the debut of the GT-R from 2005 to 2007 just so Nissan can "get it right"? Whats there to get right? They made Godzilla damn it! If you read that like I did, it seems like Ghosn is really trying to weigh heavily on the GT-R R+D team to get it how HE envisions it... whether the Japanese like it or not (read: he`s a tool).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
    • Well, hydraulic lifters will get noisy if they are dirty/fouled in some way, and exactly how that manifests will depend on exactly what schmutz is where. There is a procedure on here somewhere for dismantling and soaking/cleaning them. Replacing them with new is about 50% of the work and about 5% of the money!
    • Thanks for the reply @GTSBoy this is is a hydraulic lifter engine. Yea right i did not realise the lifters were supposed to be compressible while installed. I could push them down but i had to lean almost my while body weight on them.  I have never heard of a lifter/ lifters ticking only at hot idle and getting worse the hotter it gets. I have owned a few jdm cars with noisy lifters. This noise is slightly more subtle, it is more of a sharp gentle metalic tic than the solid and more loud tapping I've heard on lifters. I have used a metal rod, alloy tube, hose and stethoscope and could not find the source of the tick. But it appears to be loudest on the actual engine block behind the exhaust cam gear and next to the oil filter. I had mate (40 year old mechanic) go over it with me and he couldn't find it either..  Could it be a cam seal issue of some sort?  Cheers  
    • This seems problematic and unlikely at the same time. Vanilla RB2Xs have hydraulic lifters. They do have "zero" clearance, but only when running with oil pressure inside them. When not running, you should be able to compress them and obtain heaps of clearance. RB26s and Neos have solid lifters. They should have ~0.3mm and ~0.5mm on the inlet and exhaust respectively. If they have zero clearance then bad things are happening. With nothing else being wrong, it would mean that the valves would be held slightly (ever so slightly) open when they are supposed to be closed and it should have all sorts of problems when running, caused by leakage in/out through the valves. Or, zero clearance can indicate severe valve seat recession. None of it is good. Have you used a piece of hose as a stethoscope to try to localise the noise?  
×
×
  • Create New...