Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys, my idle is a little high and the tune a little rich so I'm thinking of going to the tuner to sort through these issues. Given there'll be dyno time I may as well consider what upgrades could be done to make the most of the tuning time.

Current set up is

Forged pistons / new rings

Std rods

New R33 crank

Block honed, decked, pressure tested etc

New bearings

New Garrets (7s) - can't really remember the exact spec

Power FC

Adjustable CAM wheels

700cc Tomei injectors (all else in the fuel system is std)

Splitfore coilpacks (old ones were failing)

New oil & water pump

3.5" zorst with high flow cat - rear of the dumps only

Running about 305 RWKW. Can't find last dyno chart (doh) so no more details that that. Engine has done 15k kms so I'd say still pretty fresh.

Next steps are....? I do not want the expense of replacing turbos. Pullng the head off is too hard and expensive

Some things that come to my mind are:

Dumps (which are currently stock)

AFMs (which are currently stock - would these make a difference?)

I'm not chasing a specific power figure but want to maximise the current set up (which has a lot invested in it already)

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280020-next-step-performance-mods/
Share on other sites

Hey man, nice flames hehe.

Im not sure u wanna do the dumps as they will probably remove the turbos for that so the labour will go up but if you do then maybe throw on some braided lines oil/water for ease of maintenance and reliability in future - possibly even port the exhaust manifolds to get a nice smooth entry and exit of exhaust into the turbos

cams come to mind? a small step up in lift will help out in the power band; thats not really removing the head but still a little work.

AFM's would be a great idea as the ones u have now are stock and getting dated so it may hold back optimal tuning and one day they will 'go' requiring a new set anyways and more $$$ for dyno time.

good luck with the choice man, keep us posted

From what I hear from those in the know R33 and 34 Dump pipes are quite decent upto around 350rwkw, so rather than spending >1000 bucks on somthing that might only gain you 2hp, you could buy some late model dumps for $200.

Are your current afms maxing out? If not i dont see the need to upgrade.

Someone else might be able to elaborate on this a bit more.

Changing dumps is a smart move. Also porting the manifolds.

Thats about it without spending any sort of meaningful amount of cash (the labour bill wont be small though as its basically a turbo change)

New z32 afm's, or 2x Q45 afms (search ebay for special $$) $200 for 2x q45's, resolder the internals yourself to make sure all A-OK.

New Cometic / Greddy / Hks head gasket, 1.2, 1.3 or 1.5mm $400

New Nissan gasket set for all other gaskets (manifolds, etc) $300

Greddy poncam camshafts, springs $1300

New EPP stem seals, valve guides, etc $300

Highflow / porting of the head while camshafts / gaskets are being fitted. $2000

bigger dump pipes, custom, search ebay lol, $500

start saving :D

at the least grab the AFM's and scour around for better Dump pipes, set aside One thousand for total output for the 4 individual items, delivered to your hand,

dont be afraid of ebay usa/jp :P

Why would he need all that?????

No need for cams or head work

the motor has been rebuilt so it would have all new gaskets anyway

He doesnt want to take the head off

Q45 Afms would be next to impossible to fit on a low mount 26 and he wouldnt need them anyway

The boost seems to fall away a bit from 22psi down to about 18.5, so it would be nice to stop that. I'd guess its due to the restrictive stock dumps, which may also make the boost build a bit lazier than it could with a better setup. A bit of a shame you didnt change them when you did the turbos, but its only money right? If your AFMs are maxing out its safer to get nismos rather than tune past it. IIRC they usually hit about 300 or just a bit less before they read the max 5.1volts.

Nick - your setup is pretty much perfect.

Anything else is basically added expense for minor, if at all, gains.

What dumps? R32? If so then you could do with changing them... but for the cost? Depends how much you really want to change it :)

Dumps, possibly a minor gain.

AFMs, no gain

Cams, IMO no gain

head gasket - silly suggestion, no gain

head work (values, guides) again silly suggestion, no gain

The only thing i would be looking at is getting the boost to hold a bit better, this could be dumps and/or boost control related... thats about the only thing I'd really be looking at otherwise you might as well change turbos and go down the 10k worth of additional bits :ninja:

The boost seems to fall away a bit from 22psi down to about 18.5, so it would be nice to stop that. I'd guess its due to the restrictive stock dumps, which may also make the boost build a bit lazier than it could with a better setup. A bit of a shame you didnt change them when you did the turbos, but its only money right? If your AFMs are maxing out its safer to get nismos rather than tune past it. IIRC they usually hit about 300 or just a bit less before they read the max 5.1volts.

You're telling me but unfortunately when the turbs were done I was all out of money and probably didn't appreciate how diffucult it would be to go back in and do them. Was 2 years ago and I know so much more now than I did then. I guess with AFMs I'll just see if they're maxing out. If so, then replace. If not, leave well enough (and the bank account) alone.

Nick - your setup is pretty much perfect.

Anything else is basically added expense for minor, if at all, gains.

What dumps? R32? If so then you could do with changing them... but for the cost? Depends how much you really want to change it :)

Dumps, possibly a minor gain.

AFMs, no gain

Cams, IMO no gain

head gasket - silly suggestion, no gain

head work (values, guides) again silly suggestion, no gain

The only thing i would be looking at is getting the boost to hold a bit better, this could be dumps and/or boost control related... thats about the only thing I'd really be looking at otherwise you might as well change turbos and go down the 10k worth of additional bits :ninja:

I was waiting to hear from you Ash. I'm pretty much on the same page as you but thought some useful comments might come out. The car is slowly becoming more track orientated so one day soon I may have the engine out to get the sump and oil pick up sorted and perhaps I'll do the dumps then. I'll see what Cptn. Tuner say about a boost controller with and without the dumps being done.

Cheers all for your replies and suggestions.

Armed with the above info I've rung the tuner and he's said an EBC would be a worthwhile step. Said dumps were not really necessary, and especially considering the labour cost involved. Said I should look at Apexi AVCR or Turbo Smart E-Boost. Said to make sure they had rpm inputs so you can control the boost at all points in the rev range. Wasn't going to be drawn on what specific power torque increases I might get, but said it would be fairly noticeable.

Suspects the rich tune and high idle are something like a vaccum line having popped off, given the PFC has not been fiddled with since I last had it tuned.

If I go down this road, where is the best place to buy the EBC? Any ideas how much?

Cheers.

What about the PFC boost controller kit? Doesn't have rpm inputs but would be a neat install given you've already got the main PFC ECU. Plus you get a boost reading on the hand controller once installed.

What about the PFC boost controller kit? Doesn't have rpm inputs but would be a neat install given you've already got the main PFC ECU. Plus you get a boost reading on the hand controller once installed.

Tuner says it must have an rpm input. Otherwise it just becomes an electronic version of the mechanical boost control it already has.

  • 1 month later...

To round this off the Turbosmart eBoost is now fitted and mysteriously I'm 9 RWKW down on the last dyno run (done ages ago). The EBC was taken out and it was still down by that amount, so prob not the EBC causing the issue. Initially there was an exhaust restriction but that was resolved so we know that is not contributing either. We given up worrying about this for now as dyno hours are racking up with no gain.

However, the car drives a whole lot nicer now. Throttle response, spool up, mid range, part throttle response (I'm probably repeating items but this is how it feels) are all much better. I can hear the turbs a lot better too......

I was really disappointed when I heard the power situation but I'm really happy now I've driven it.

Strange world.

Attached is dyno sheet. On the boost map you can see the boost is kept at a constant 21ish psi from 3800 rpm where it used to drop off from about 4800rpm. At 2580, 3320 & 4060 rpm the new map is 2psi, 3psi, 3psi higher respectively (roughly). The tuner said they’d take out the hump in the mid range. Apparently the more linear delivery means you can get on the throttle earlier and you actually go faster. They also said the ‘performance feel’ might be reduced by this. Odd as the performance feel is much better according the part of my body that contacts the seat. There are some small power gains between early 3k rpm and mid 4k rpm, but not much to my eye.

I guess what may explain why the chart looks ‘worse’ and the feel is better may be in the torque map which I wasn’t supplied. Perhaps there is better early torque delivery (even if the ultimate amount is less than it was). The other potential reason is the exhaust restriction. I guess it may have been there for a while, I got used to it, and now it’s gone I’m feeling the gain of that. I wouldn’t discount this, but there is definitely a ‘style’ of delivery in this current set up that has never been there before so I’m guessing it’s a combo of both. Maybe there’s a little bit of 'I’ve spent time and money and I want to feel an improvement, so I actually do…….

It’s been a bit of a hassle (the effing EBC was supplied broken, but replaced with no questions asked) and has been costly (yes Ash you told me it was incremental gains at this stage) but I’m not sure that given my time again I’d not do it anyway. I’m really happy with how it feels.

Overall, odd.

dyno.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How's your first born doing? 😛 As for now what? Time to forget about it for 12 to 18 months while your go down a totally unrelated rabbit hole... 😛
    • Fuse taps are perfectly fine to use, especially when you're adding stuff for your own car, and so long as you're being smart about it. IE, don't throw a 30amp circuit, onto a circuit that is only a small circuit. It's best to add a small circuit, to one that is already quite large. Oh, and make sure you're not going to blow the fuses that are further upstream too! I dislike their use in other applications, such as alarms, telematics/tracking devices etc, as it's far too easy for someone to unplug them and render a system useless. Those sorts of devices I go for wiring in quite secretively.
    • Fob is all cleaned up and it’s working well!! The amount of Vegemite looking sh*t that was in there is mind blowing 
    • Given it is temporary, I bought a  cheapy gauge mount (which has become enflattened) which I will screw into the existing phone mount Also a first for me; given this is a temporary install I could not think of any reason not to use one of those "add a fuse" thingies to source the battery and IGN power. I had always figured they were pretty dodgy but having a good look at them I think they are a valid option for sourcing power from an existing source without cutting 
    • Finally for now, a bit more work on the transmission temp gauge. I was wondering how Raceworks do a gauge for $100 that autometer want $500 for. No idea about the accuracy of course, but they have cut a few corners that made things hard.  First one I mentioned above, the sender is physically difficult to fit and doesn't work with their own adapters (the extra fittings I used to get the sender into a hose cost more than the whole gauge, lucky I had stuff in the shed) Second, the temp sender wires are way too short. They are shown as 2.7m on the box and I know my routing was long from navigator headlight to driver's firewall back to centre console, but I had to lengthen them by about 2m total - 2 joins in each wire. Also, same with the supplied power loom, they needed about an extra 1m to get the fuse box where I sourced power. Another join in each wire since one end wasn't supplied terminated. I know they could argue that the wires might be long enough depending on situation, but when you consider parts and particularly labour, it would be a very expensive cheap gauge if you can't do the work yourself. And, only a small issue....but it would have been nice if they remembered to tap a tread onto *both* spacers they supplied for the bracket....I haven't had to use the M4 tap often!
×
×
  • Create New...