Jump to content
SAU Community

Checking Afrs Using Wideband In Tailpipe


Recommended Posts

If you took measurements from a car from the tailpipe, then from the bung before the catalyst, do you actually notice any difference in AFR? I didn't think any o2 sensor is that sensitive that it could measure the difference?

The catalyst removes oxygen from the oxides of nitrogen and then combines the oxygen with the carbon monoxide to create carbon dioxide. So it really only takes the oxygen from one place and puts it in another and both before and after the cat, the wideband doesn't recognise the gases before they are split with their other particle.

Or are you referring to it effecting the result in that it is slower, not so much changing the reading?

I think your last question is what Trent is refering to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have links to suppliers of multi probe EGT systems ? I'm curious as to how its packaged and how it gets the message across - without necessarily data logging .

I want to set up for Datalogit and Tech Edge and probably an RB25's cast exhaust manifold .

I'm not sure if its practical to drill and tap a std manifold so are there other ways to get a usable heat reading like for example thermocouples under the mounting nuts .

The only EGT system I ever saw in the flesh was a VDO gauge and single probe , I guess you'd go cross eyed looking at 6 of those !

It's not hard to see a single O2 probe getting an average and missing an individual cylinders death throws .

If anyones interested in commenting is it the front cylinders that have issues masked by "safe AFR's" in single turbo RB's ?

Cheers , A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did a dyno run once with a stock 26 with the innovative LM1 sensor stuck in the tail pipe... 3" exhaust no cat.

We actually had to stop the run because ratios were like 13-14 on full load.

Then got a bung welded in about 3ft from the turbos and guess what..... ratios were in the vicinity of 11-10.5 on full load.

So i guess it does make a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did a dyno run once with a stock 26 with the innovative LM1 sensor stuck in the tail pipe... 3" exhaust no cat.

We actually had to stop the run because ratios were like 13-14 on full load.

Then got a bung welded in about 3ft from the turbos and guess what..... ratios were in the vicinity of 11-10.5 on full load.

So i guess it does make a difference.

Leaks in the exhaust will affect things like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something no one has mentioned is that pressure in the exhaust can affect the reading too. Reading the techedge site, from what i can gather it seems it will actually read richer with pressure, can anyone else read and confirm. They don't actually say it from memory, but give a formula to work it out.

Definately putting it in the O2 bung to do light load tuning and idle etc is much more responsive at low rpm's

Also something to watch for, when using tailpipe method. If your pipe going into the exhaust can only go in on an angle, it can create a Bernouli ? effect, and suck air back up the pipe at low revs/load . And on some cars the exhaust pulsing can cause fresh air sucked in and dilute readingsat idle and very low rpm.

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to add to all that, if you are using the LM1 unit and the wideband sensor they supply with it, you cannot run it in the dump pipe as the gas flow is too fast for one particular sensor.

If you get the other sensor, then you can do it in the dump but the one they send you sucks wang for dump pipe measurements and it stalls on rich. EG. as soon as boost comes on it just stays at 11.7 but put it in the tailpipe and it reads 12.2 and fluctuates as it goes richer or leaner.

The holes in the end point outwards and are small so they don't gather the gases like the other sensor does. I think the Techedge one is better for that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have links to suppliers of multi probe EGT systems ? I'm curious as to how its packaged and how it gets the message across - without necessarily data logging .

I want to set up for Datalogit and Tech Edge and probably an RB25's cast exhaust manifold .

I'm not sure if its practical to drill and tap a std manifold so are there other ways to get a usable heat reading like for example thermocouples under the mounting nuts .

The only EGT system I ever saw in the flesh was a VDO gauge and single probe , I guess you'd go cross eyed looking at 6 of those !

It's not hard to see a single O2 probe getting an average and missing an individual cylinders death throws .

If anyones interested in commenting is it the front cylinders that have issues masked by "safe AFR's" in single turbo RB's ?

Cheers , A .

yes i have for my car an add on to the motec m800 an E888 that allows me to run 8 egt's and log either on my dash or ecu !

also motec have what the call LTC 's (lambda to CAN) and you can run up to 32 lambda's on a CAN bus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have links to suppliers of multi probe EGT systems ? I'm curious as to how its packaged and how it gets the message across - without necessarily data logging .

I want to set up for Datalogit and Tech Edge and probably an RB25's cast exhaust manifold .

I'm not sure if its practical to drill and tap a std manifold so are there other ways to get a usable heat reading like for example thermocouples under the mounting nuts .

The only EGT system I ever saw in the flesh was a VDO gauge and single probe , I guess you'd go cross eyed looking at 6 of those !

It's not hard to see a single O2 probe getting an average and missing an individual cylinders death throws .

If anyones interested in commenting is it the front cylinders that have issues masked by "safe AFR's" in single turbo RB's ?

Cheers , A .

Google innovate. Theres a few display options for the laptop, half dozen gauges, coloured bars etc but the graph is most useful. The issues aren't in the end cylinders.

This is a completed tune.

LumpyTune.jpg

It's no where neat as a system like walk510 is talking about, each box only reads 4 thermocouples so you need two of em daisy chained together -gets a bit messy when its connected to the wideband as well. You get what you pay for with motec.

egt.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Racepak IQ3 dash range is really good and reasonably priced. Around 1200 for a display and 2400 for a 512meg logger dash.

4 x egt kit costs around 1100.

Haltech sells EGT kits that output a 0-5v signal that can be used with any ecu for $300

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
×
×
  • Create New...