Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Steve, what were you rolling on whilst laughing your arse off? :(

paullys 32,

Someone added a few "colourful" posts on your behalf mate ;) I deleted them as they weren't really appropriate, very funny though :)

Has someone else been using your login mate? If so, they have a healthy sense of humour :)

Hey Bumped into a guy that drives a Red 300ZX we got conversing and he told me that he got defected and the policeman got out a stanely knife and cut a cross into his window tint on the drivers and passengers side windows! Isn't that property damage??? I dont think they can do that?!

hmmmm window tint is a very controversial topic. I think that driver and passanger tint is illegal in sa full stop. I THINK.

It wasn't weather or not it was illegal to have the tint. Its weather or not it was illegal for a police man without the permission of the owner to cause property damage by slashing the window tint with a stanley knife.

I am fairly sure its not illegal, just that front passenger windows are only allowed a slight tint (and most factory tinted glass meets this standard) and any additional tint will make them illegal. The front window from memmory cant be tinted except for the top section (ie where the BOYZ put there HOLDEN stiklas - coz they is fully sik.)

Its a power thing (for some)

Like most jobs you will always get the dic* heads on their "aren't I better than you" power trips, and lets face it what other job gives you that much power, lets you carry a gun in public, can pay in excess of $40,000 upon graduation (at 18 or 19) and requires little more than a year 11 education. Most of these guys were NEVER going to be rocket scientists, and some wouldnt even qualify for the job of "chimpanze" to sit in the rocket.

the windows can be tinted, but must allow at least 70% of the light through.  If you live in other states, its 35%.  It used to be 70%, but the federal laws were changed to allow 35% - its just that SA are in the dark ages.

Guys is it not property damage, illegal or not, to damage tint with a stanley knife.

Without the permission of the vehicle owner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...