Jump to content
SAU Community

Sat Nav Solution?


jpcdanny
 Share

Recommended Posts

How's the non-fm transmitter iPod/iPhone solution coming along? :happy:

have somethng on the way need to do a bit of fiddling.

-------

JDM - not a true solution. I can do the same thing to the JDM as the ADM ones I do.

to do it properly would be a full swap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do find the UBD quite usefull. Sat navs are for wives cars that cant read maps!

Having trouble finding your way round Perth Danny? Could always ask a police officer. HaHa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

for those that still have the shits over this. I am working on utilising the touchscreen setup in this car to control a nav system. stay tuned.

(thanks to a certain person in sydney for the pieces as well!!!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that there were a few people talking about dodgy solutions to the Sat Nav has anybody actually got a solution to this yet?

New Solution, also inexpensive gives you reverse camera & sat nav.

Buy a reverse video mirror & camera from www.thecarkitcompany.com.au cost $420.00 plus installation has 2 video and audio inputs, this product is supplied to the american car manufacturers and looks like genuine factory.

Then purchase a Garmin remote control Sat Nav model Gvm 53 Part Number: 010-00668-00 cost including mapping $850.0 plus installation

https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=134&pID=10573

All will work as one unit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have a look at the original mirror. last one I had in front of me had the key pickup inside it. removng the OEM mirror removed that and the car doesn't start. happy to be proven wrong.

This a new Australian deliveried Nissan Gt r which i had fitted with the camera video mirror.

This has been fitted for the last few weeks and believe me no problems.

I consider you to be completly wrong as i have not had a of problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...