Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As i was installing the plenum today, a problem came up, i have a R34 GTT, so i bought the AAC from a R33, a Q45 TB, and went to install them, BUT, i can't find nowhere what to do with the line that comes from the back of the valley cover(the one behind the cam gears), i believe that water runs through it but i am not sure what to do with it... Please someone help me...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281861-greddy-style-plenum-problem/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Is it the water feed for the turbo?

if so, on the back of the thermostat housing is another outlet, that normally runs into the coolant bleeder than into the intake, then to the turbo (on an r33) I assume its the same for the NEO 6. so that turbo feed line will need to be Tee'd into there (depending on what you have done with the coolant bleed screw)

Pics will help

I saw somewere this:

th_untitled245445.jpg

It is this line that i am saying(but on a Rb25det NEO)

In this thread it says it is a vaccum line somewhere... that you disconect when you install rb26 cam covers..

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...tt-t243185.html

So this was a vacuum line going to the power steering.. found it today..

Now i have another problem the R33 ACC is very different to the one of R34, the one has 2 connectors and the R34 one connector..

Please somebody who knows...

So this was a vacuum line going to the power steering.. found it today..

Now i have another problem the R33 ACC is very different to the one of R34, the one has 2 connectors and the R34 one connector..

Please somebody who knows...

Somebody please help me with the idle valves...

  • 3 years later...

Has anyonw done back to backs with the greddy/freddy plenum?

Im considering one for my drift car but havet tested one myself

I'm pretty certain that there's a thread on FF plenums and several of the guys went backwards running one. The thread did center on the plazmaman iirc but doubt there'd be any difference. I'll see if I can dig the thread up and post it back here.

Has anyonw done back to backs with the greddy/freddy plenum?

Im considering one for my drift car but havet tested one myself

curious in results if you end up testing back to back....i thought about changing from my plazmaman due to the size but worried about lack of HP! i know the plazma will make power but not sure a greddy or copy would

The consensus is that the Greddy style ones will cost a (non RB26) RB low-mid torque and response in exchange for an increase in the top end that probably isn't worth it. The Plazmaman ones suffer a little less at the bottom end because they retain the longer original lower runners and also provide some increase at the top end.

The only real value is in being able to clear the top of the engine and run shorter intercooler piping - not that the shorter piping actually has that much effect, beyond placebo anyway.

Anyway, as has been said above, this has been thrashed to death in its own thread.

Thanks guys i will have a search for the thread now.

And sorry if my question wasnt clear i meant a back to back between standard plenum and freddy/greddy.

Thanks GTSBoy, thats my thoughts exactly due to runner length.

yeah, if you are aiming for high rev/boost/power setup its probably a good upgrade..though I have read of issues with leaning out on certain cylinders...the rear i think it was, I dont recall any "Factual evidence"

I think where they failed is people were slapping them on streeters thinking it was a huge upgrade but in reality it was pointless, with the only benefit being easier plug changes.. :rofl:...If its on high rev track car it probably wont do any harm...question is will it do any good on your specific setup...

Way i see it alot of big power setups use them so they cant be all bad...But on your drifter Jez (if thats what its for)...probably not worth the effort as you might gain a little up top and may lose low range torque and response..robbing Peter to pay Paul so to speak...

I bought one for my car but when I looked into it benefits (or lack thereof) and the effort involved in swapping it over , I sold it again

However if I had a huge turbo and planned to run 2 bar through it I would be more inclined put one on...

probably better to buy a blank plenum hat and start from scratch then...chop up stock manifold weld on tubes and hat...isnt that what hypertune do :unsure:

but what are you trying to acheive with it Jez, more power, better response...??

personally I think if you want more power just get the bigger turbo, (read t67 :P) throw a freddy on and crank up the boost...

if you want better "driveability" your time/money might be better spent adapting rb26 TBs.,, ...

Jez,

Ramtubes in plenums are so completely overrated that I wouldn't bother. It is absolutely true that if you have a nice big fat plenum with simple holes into the runners that almost any ramtube will improve the flow rate into each runner. It is also true that you can choose the best ramtube (that would be the design that is rolled over so that you have a 1/2 donut shape lying on the floor of the plenum around each runner inlet) to maximise the benefit. But what is a major stumbling block is that it is not possible to make a nice big fat plenum to house these things in. The real world plenum on an inline 6 is constricted by the brake and/or clutch master cylinders and any other obstacles on that side of the engine. As such the side wall of the plenum opposite the inlet runners is already closer to the runners than you would like, and so sticking bellmouths up into the plenum space just steals from the room available for the air to make the turn into the runner.

It gets worse. 6 trumpets all in a row. All the air has to flow past all the trumpets to get to the last one. There will be wakes and eddies after each trumpet sticking up that affect the flow into the next one. Ramtubes only work well when you can get the air to flow towards each one of them as if it was the only one in the world. if you stick them in a row in a long plenum, then you have to start trying to fix the problems that they cause to each other (by other flow treatments inside the plenum) in order to get back to where you were before you had trumpets. Not worth the hassle.

If it were me, I would just the absolute minimum, which would be to either have a generous radius machined into the baseplate of the plenum where each runner starts, or put the half donut style bellmouths around each one. That last design would be, for say a 40-50mm runner diameter, probably mean that the donut would be maybe 15mm section thickness and therefore stand about 7.5mm proud of the baseplate. Would look a lot like this http://www.velocityf.../10950_WEBS.jpg with the back edge hard up against the baseplate. I'd remove the excess material from the back edge so that there was no parallel section, just radius.

Edited by GTSBoy

have you seen the custom plenum made to address all the issues you mentioned...some guy did it and theres a thread on it, not sure if it was on this forum but its a crazy piece of work...I doubt the effort was worth it though...lets face it on a 30 yr old motor just about everything that can be done has been done....your really got to be pushing to find a newer/ better way...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean I can be OCD'y but this is really over the top. At that point why not just run a full wideband fuel controller? Especially if you run 3 widebands. The system works pretty well, which is trimming low load stuff to be within a few percent of the base map. Pre-engine _change_ the base map was only 1-2% off, depending on ambient temp, elevation, etc. Under load the LS is really very straightforward to tune, enough that a wideband closed loop would be overkill. If I really cared (and I hope I don't) I can always just go back to the MAF system the car actually came with. Which does all those nice calculations for me (temp, altitude, etc), now that you can buy 102mm MAF's that do not cause restrictions.
    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
×
×
  • Create New...