Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

performance wise would the PM35 stag , keep up with the nm series turbo stag , i know power delivery would be different , but how much so ? :(

I guess as it is the VQ35DE it would have performance similar to a V35 but with a heavier body.

From what I have read the V35 coupe is doing about a 6.7-6.9 0-100 and the M35 is meant to be about 6.5 - 6.7 0-100.

So I would imagine it would be a tad slower than the Vq25DET.

I also saw today that the 2WD version of the PM35 has a slightly higher diff ration than that of the 4WD version. I guess this is because it would be putting a little more power to the driving wheels (2 only) than the 4WD equivalent.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4751807
Share on other sites

I guess as it is the VQ35DE it would have performance similar to a V35 but with a heavier body.

From what I have read the V35 coupe is doing about a 6.7-6.9 0-100 and the M35 is meant to be about 6.5 - 6.7 0-100.

So I would imagine it would be a tad slower than the Vq25DET.

I also saw today that the 2WD version of the PM35 has a slightly higher diff ration than that of the 4WD version. I guess this is because it would be putting a little more power to the driving wheels (2 only) than the 4WD equivalent.

cheers, that rests my case . stick with the nm35 , unless i can come up with the money to turbo the pm35 :( $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4752802
Share on other sites

Don't bag a PM35 unless you've driven one. I initially had my doubts as well but after driving one for 20 minutes, I was truly hooked.

Imo I reckon a PM35 2WD will go as good, if not better than a 4WD NM35. The gearbox is also improved as well in the later models so manual shifting feels a lot more crisp and responds better than the older NM35's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4752867
Share on other sites

Don't bag a PM35 unless you've driven one. I initially had my doubts as well but after driving one for 20 minutes, I was truly hooked.

Imo I reckon a PM35 2WD will go as good, if not better than a 4WD NM35. The gearbox is also improved as well in the later models so manual shifting feels a lot more crisp and responds better than the older NM35's.

i'd love the current version , but i'd like awd, and i think the awd pm35 might be a bit sluggish, with the extra weight , but then again haven't driven so im being ignorant, might have to see if i can organise a side by side driving test , once compliance is finished with the pm35.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4752950
Share on other sites

The power delivery would be completely different. The NM35 has higher PEAK power and torque but I'd be willing to bet the PM35 has significantly more power and torque up to say 2200-ish rpm, possibly higher.

Dont just look at the power figures on paper, thats just the maximums. If they could quote you "average" torque figures, or if you could get hold of a dyno graph of each (showing power and torque), that might make it easier to compare.

This means that driving around town the PM35 would have a fair amount of get-up-and-go, more so than the turbo model. One extra Litre ought to make quite a difference to low-end torque.

The power delivery would be much more linear in the PM35. but no turbo, no fun - I say, although if you're not into turbos then this isn't likely to matter one bit.

The PM35 would also be better on fuel too. There are many things in its favour...but I'd miss the turbo. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4753128
Share on other sites

The PM35 would also be better on fuel too. There are many things in its favour...but I'd miss the turbo. :P

You would think so... Official numbers state that the VQ35DE powered PM35 is worse on fuel than the VQ25DET powered NM35.

PM35 (VQ35DE) - 8.2km/L = 12.1L/100kms

NM35 (VQ25DET) - 8.9km/L = 11.1L/100kms

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4753143
Share on other sites

You would think so... Official numbers state that the VQ35DE powered PM35 is worse on fuel than the VQ25DET powered NM35.

PM35 (VQ35DE) - 8.2km/L = 12.1L/100kms

NM35 (VQ25DET) - 8.9km/L = 11.1L/100kms

That's could just be the Nissan factory tunes getting worse and worse!

Most people I've spoken to who have been dynoing Nissan vehicles (including imports) have said most of the models just run way too rich, they mainly put it down to bad tuning. Who know's, maybe the fuel companies have a handshake agreement with Nissan :down:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4753587
Share on other sites

That's could just be the Nissan factory tunes getting worse and worse!

Most people I've spoken to who have been dynoing Nissan vehicles (including imports) have said most of the models just run way too rich, they mainly put it down to bad tuning. Who know's, maybe the fuel companies have a handshake agreement with Nissan ;)

So a tuner thinks that Nissan make a bad tune for a car they build from the ground up, meaning the tuner can do better?

Being that Nissan program the ECU from scratch to have the car appeal to wide audience (more sales), with high reliability...

That is probably not a statement the tuner can back up.

Having said that, I will be in line (eventually) to have my ECU re-mapped.

It's not really bad tuning. The cars run rich so that it reduces the chances of an engine failure.
:)

That's what I heard as well.. Better to be too rich and use a bit more fuel than the lean out and grenade the engine...

:stupid: 's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4754330
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...