Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually seems as the subject of you becoming an actual member has been brought up -

With the negative attitude you have shown, I'm not really sure you would be welcomed into the club anyway.

Should you decide to become a member, the committee will review your application before allowing you membership.

My negative attitude? the only attitude i've showin was to ppl who feel the need to be sarcastic when it comes to whiners and my membership when i've already explained it, apart from that it was a legitimate attempt to find a reason why/what happens when it comes to car shows/events and how come we didnt have anyone organise SOMETHING.

I now know and i'm fine with it, i really think you misunderstand. and i was only getting fed up because i felt i was repeating myself...thats all really. But if you feel the need to do it then fine do what you must.

and i understand that. so if i was a member already and brought this up would it have changed the way this seems to have turned out? a wanna-be member trying to understand something and then basically called a whiner and a tool and expect me to take it? all because i'm not a member yet?

This has blown way outa proportion it seems some ppl may have taken offence as there are thing i dont understand of yet, which was all i was trying to find out as my first impressions were not so great. It seems i am let down again. :dry:

I love my skyline and just wanted to share it with other sauwa guys as i was going to join, now i will need tobe scrutinised by the committee. Great. ;)

I have to agree with snoop on this one guys, i think people were a little too harsh on him. I for one didn't see his attitude as negative, i rather viewed it as the attitude of someone who would like to take the opportunity to get involved in things. Perhaps his methods and wording were a little bit off, but i certainly didn't see it as negative. Although im no committee member, i thought i should just say that.

Give the guy a break, effectively all he did was question why we were not involved in these big events, although i agree he could have raised the question in a different manner. However had some of us simply explained the situation to him without 'attacking' him, his issues may have been resolved easier.

Of course that is just my opinion

I've lost count of how many times this has been covered.

Imma let you finish....but imma build a 30! That will solve this issue. :down:

Sorry, trying to change the subject as conversation isnt going any where. :P

No point getting this upset about it

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...