Jump to content
SAU Community

Electric Power Steering Pump Conversion For Rb Engine


9krpm

Recommended Posts

On 30.4.2017 at 11:59 AM, aleks said:

Acrula, which pump do you think is heavier the nissan one or the A-class? what car do you have? any pictures of where you mounted it?

I've weighed an rb26 pump and I think it was 2kgs, just the pump no belt, bracket or lines but I will double check.

I'm thinking of sneaking one in under the starter motor, even if it weight is close to the same, having it lower and further back would be nice.

Think I might head down to a wrecker and ask them if I can look at and weigh every type of electric pump they have.

Hi there! I am not sure wich is heavier, atleast the R32 one would be abit of a heavy lump compared to the R33 P/S pump for example.

I would say this one is a tad lighter or close to stock weight. The car I have is R32 GT-R. I have mounted it near the stock location, since this was a quick fix and another belt driven pump wasnt easy to get. I will relocate it and "hide" it later, I thought about the boot, but unsure about pressure loss. If not, maybe between radiator and intercooler in a corner?

With the stock location I could use the stock piping bolt-on the pump, then it just need 12v. The steering rack itself adjust rack pressure so it get stiffer at higher speeds.

18472594_10158614513310537_483189258_o.jpg

18471895_10158614514275537_640121798_o.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the standard pump, belt, bracket and bolts weighs 4kgs. The lines and reservior are probably another two kilos plus the extra power steer fluid if you can mount the pump closer to the rack.

I got my hands on an mrs power steering pump and they weigh 4.6kgs.

I think it can be done weight neutral. maybe even less weight and off the front the car if I can fit it under the starter motor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Funnily enough i got my car out to the track* for the first time with the pump today. No complaints!
No idea about current but i've got twin walbros and this added to the mix of the normal system and no issues that I can see. Throw in twin thermos and maybe?
Might have to see if i can get a current draw measuremnet taken some time during use.
 

Mounted it under battery tray using astra mount with flat bar welded to create 3 points of attachment.
Pass lines through old BoV vacum feed enlarged. Run down chassis rail past steering column to rack. Feed is -6 200 series line, return is just to barb with 3/8th or some size hose. Used exactly 1m of hose for return, feed was probably about that long.

One of the rack fittings and the one in the PS pump are one size, one is one size smaller, any Speedflow/aeroflow etc bump fitting should do the trick. Used a local brand though did have leaks, re did them using some thread sealant and no issues since.

P1150629.thumb.JPG.6a54422ff826ac47d883b0a11cac3b76.JPG

 

P1150627.thumb.JPG.560b36c1c1dfa6b0e275f5f190a412d3.JPG

 

P1150626.thumb.JPG.1f5f4da47899dba5a0822c4c87754806.JPG

 

P1150625.thumb.JPG.7d69a60f9dea095a1e4e99e0035454db.JPG

 

*track being happylaps at lakeside, though I did get in a few 70-80% attack corners here and there

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

earth and power to battery post, both of the control circuits to ign. there's also a fuse in there. 
Apparently both of the control wires do different things and i'll probabyl sort it out using one so it only turns on when engine is actually running unless i flick a switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Known as 'bump fittings', pretty sure it was 1x 8m and 2x 10mm but you'd need to google up some info about it. Search for skyline rack fitting size or similar.

 

Still running a stock alternator with all this extra electrical load, Pete? 

Be interesting to see a voltage log.

for what its worth with the second fuel pump going now i'm seeing voltage drop now so will need an ARD unit or something at some point

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...