Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As an engineer who sets up various control loops in industry I will have crack. A controller typically has three values of interest:

Setpoint (SP) - The amount of boost you want

Control Value (CV) - The output to the variable bleed valve, or pulsing of on/off valve or pushing/pulling the wastegate itself.

Process Value (PV) - The amount of boost you are getting.

To manually set one up you would typically make a step change to the CV (eg. valve from 0% to 50% open) and measure the response to the PV (how long it takes to reach the final boost value, and rate of change). With these measurements you set controller such that it gets the value you want as soon as possible, with little over shoot, and then hold where you want it.

A "learning" controller does this for you. While learning it changes whatever it varies to effect boost level and measures what effect it has on boost with your setup (ie. your turbo, your exhaust, ambient temp etc.).

It's not hype it's necessity. If it doesn't learn you would either have slow spool up or overshoot.

  • 4 weeks later...

with the GReddy Profec A, its learning mode is used to learn the features of the actuator type, external wastegates, and the stability of the boost curve. There are two learning phases:

1. Learns the stock base boost level

2. Learns the basic boost curve and the difference between the pressure in the wastegate and the pressure in the intake manifold.

You need to run the learning mode again after any changes are made to the characteristics of the wastegate spring or the power output of the engine.

Not sure about the apexi boost control kit for the pfc, but would assume it is similar.

for example, after installing my pfc, Z32 afm's and cam gears, I had trouble with boost spiking and then dropping off at high rpm. After running the learning mode it now once again holds my desired boost level spot on through the entire rev range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
×
×
  • Create New...