Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So far Ive got a couple of photos picked out for the main pages. RBWARE, The photo you sent is great, so ill be using that for one of them.

What i do need from everyone is some sort of front cover shot. A group shot would be cool, like I used last year, but feel free to throw me a few ideas/designs. Something incorporating the Logo if possible, but the printers can put that onto there anyway, like they did last year.

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

id say it would probably be better if we got one of the SAU member's R35's for it than just a pic of a random 35 GTR.

thats cool. just thought i would offer. is it limited to skylines only or can i send in a few photos of my rs4? im going down the great ocean road tonight so ill get a few nice shots.

If some one brings a good camera to the track day on Monday we should be able to get a massive group photo on the track :P

Good idea! Couple of mates of mine have some decent camera hardware, I'll be sure to get one :P

any photos from the track day available?

Still need help with a front cover, so some decent photos from a track day may be usable.

Got few more photos through, but still need more. Stageas are more than welcome!

any photos from the track day available?

Still need help with a front cover, so some decent photos from a track day may be usable.

Got few more photos through, but still need more. Stageas are more than welcome!

i got some more to send to u flick...did u get the first lot ok?

-D

Hey Flick, I just sent you an email, hope they are suitable. :(

---edit---Just realised I sent the smaller pictures as attatchments and not the full size.

Hope the second email turned out better.

Dohmar, yep got them all ok! Feel free to send more if you want.

Dayz, got yours aswell, thanks!

Everyone has about 2 more weeks to submit more photos, and ill also be taking orders soon so I can give the printers a rough idea of how many to print in the first batch. They should be around the $25 per calender I would say, but ill confirm that soon.

Sounding like a broken record, but the more the bettter, the higher quality the better, and be creative! THeres a few people on here that have submitted some amazing photos that they put alot of time and effort into, and they will look awesome in the calender.

Cant wait to get them printed up!

Dohmar, yep got them all ok! Feel free to send more if you want.

Thanks :( Just sent another 4, 3 were taken by nightcrawler and one was taken by the riverland newspaper :D (probably best photo of my car I've ever seen - thanks stuart!)

-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...