Jump to content
SAU Community

I Bought A Skyline!


Panko
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Congratulation!

I remember the same excitement when I got mine last year

... The first smile on my face from driving a car ... :P

Keep it well and it will make you a happy man! :P

And that smile on the face every time you drive it will never wear off .. :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulation!

I remember the same excitement when I got mine last year

... The first smile on my face from driving a car ... :thumbsup:

Keep it well and it will make you a happy man! :thumbsup:

And that smile on the face every time you drive it will never wear off .. :(

Yep true that ! I had problem sleeping since the day I drop my deposit for the car until I

pick her up a week after. The way she moves makes me smile :thumbsup: and can't beat the turbos sound.

I remember the first day I was hopeless with the twin plates clutch. Dumping the clutch

at almost every traffic light at around 1.5k RPM :) Now i'm okay with twin plates :thumbsup:

Coming from a manual Corolla, this is way way better to drive, just a bit paranoid when I

park her out in a public car park :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh... 1 question, is there a fuel level warning light in this car?

I didn't see the warning light even when the needle touches

the empty side of the gauge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLoody NICE!

man im jealous, i think im driving the wrong car!

Don't be mate. I'll be jealouse when I can't fit my snowboard inside the GTR :)

Still trying to fit my bloody snowboard !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a mate of mine fits his bmx bike in the back of his 32 gtr lol

its an hilarious sight hahah

but my board is 157 cm I think now sure :mrt: it's quite long ! shoulda take the

pic of the bmx in a GTR :)

Nice car man, Black GTRs look tough as.

Btw there is a fuel warning light when ur needle is sitting right on the empty line.

Cheers mate so I can find out how many Kms I get before the warning light.

I had to fill up before the warning light last time because I wasn't sure if

there's actually a warning light. Just to be safe :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but my board is 157 cm I think now sure :P it's quite long ! shoulda take the

pic of the bmx in a GTR :D

Cheers mate so I can find out how many Kms I get before the warning light.

I had to fill up before the warning light last time because I wasn't sure if

there's actually a warning light. Just to be safe :D

i hope you don't have a heavy right foot :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...