Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

have you experinced cases where light weight pullies made no difference?? reducing the rotating mass of a motor would decrease its work load, requiring less power to turn its self, they say its a similar effect to that of a light weight flywheel, im not saying i believe their claims hands down, but it makes sense to me...

This is correct, and fine if your removing the weight of accessory pulelys etc, but the crank pulley is needed as a balencer to help harmonics issues the straight 6's have like Chrispy said. Some people actually go heavier...

Yes underdrive pulley's will give some effect, but not much, they are more necesary if your engine spends most of its time in the higher rev range (instead of its designed lower rpm operating range) since for example an alternator might peak at ~ 3000rpm engine speed, after that its just waste, or a water pump might spin too fast to have enough cooling time in the radiator (and thermostats being non-intelligent will just be fully open, when they need to be restricting to slow down waterflow so the radiator can cool it effectively).

underdriving power steering, will do nothing, as there is next to no load when not steering (if you cut your PS belt on a dyno, i'd be suprised if it made 0.1kw [100w] difference). Water pump, you should go electric, for best temperature control, otherwise when not revving the ballbag out of your engine (i.e. long idling, low speed traffic) your going to cook your engine, wheres an electric water pump will have alot more control, and less drain + no cavitation. Ditto for thermo fan.

I'd say leave your power steering alone, and then all thats left is alternator, which depends on your current draw, if you turn on all your accessory's, lights etc, and the alternator is still producing more power than there is being drawn (when underdriven at idle) then thats fine, but if its not, it will just be more hastle then its worth, for the sake of a kW or 2...

You might be able to get a high amperage alternator and underdrive that, but $ per kW, possibly not the best investment.

remove your clutch fan for sure, water pump if your keen (and go electric), but everything else i would leave as is. Best bang for buck though is to save for some cams, $500-$600 will get you some regrinds, $900 will get you some billet brand names (which can be more wild) if your on stock management (bound by stock rev limit + vct), try and keep the duration low and the lift high. If you go the CAM route, you might want to let it breath a little easier also, with a larger or twin TB, and apppropriate sized intake.

Edited by SKiT_R31
This is correct, and fine if your removing the weight of accessory pulelys etc, but the crank pulley is needed as a balencer to help harmonics issues the straight 6's have like Chrispy said. Some people actually go heavier...

Yes underdrive pulley's will give some effect, but not much, they are more necesary if your engine spends most of its time in the higher rev range (instead of its designed lower rpm operating range) since for example an alternator might peak at ~ 3000rpm engine speed, after that its just waste, or a water pump might spin too fast to have enough cooling time in the radiator (and thermostats being non-intelligent will just be fully open, when they need to be restricting to slow down waterflow so the radiator can cool it effectively).

underdriving power steering, will do nothing, as there is next to no load when not steering (if you cut your PS belt on a dyno, i'd be suprised if it made 0.1kw [100w] difference). Water pump, you should go electric, for best temperature control, otherwise when not revving the ballbag out of your engine (i.e. long idling, low speed traffic) your going to cook your engine, wheres an electric water pump will have alot more control, and less drain + no cavitation. Ditto for thermo fan.

I'd say leave your power steering alone, and then all thats left is alternator, which depends on your current draw, if you turn on all your accessory's, lights etc, and the alternator is still producing more power than there is being drawn (when underdriven at idle) then thats fine, but if its not, it will just be more hastle then its worth, for the sake of a kW or 2...

You might be able to get a high amperage alternator and underdrive that, but $ per kW, possibly not the best investment.

remove your clutch fan for sure, water pump if your keen (and go electric), but everything else i would leave as is. Best bang for buck though is to save for some cams, $500-$600 will get you some regrinds, $900 will get you some billet brand names (which can be more wild) if your on stock management (bound by stock rev limit + vct), try and keep the duration low and the lift high. If you go the CAM route, you might want to let it breath a little easier also, with a larger or twin TB, and apppropriate sized intake.

awsome answer man, alot of good points, looks like cams will be next, thanks!

  • 3 weeks later...

People don't underdrive pulleys for the power gains (although there is a very slight gain, since power = force x speed, and you're reducing the line speed of the belt). The main reaso they do it is if the engine lives at high RPM, to protect the alt and keep the water pump in the efficient range.

Excessive RPM will caviatate a water pump - not a good thing (means it's trying to pump air instead of water)!! If you plan to race the car, by all means use an underdrive crank pulley for those reasons. You WILL get some free horsepower, but I doubt anyone this side of Michael Schumaker would notice it. If it's just a street engine - probably not worth the effort.

Do NOT change your multi vee belt for a single vee. You might as well swap your RB engine for a pushrod 202 if that's the case - big step back in technology. (less slip and far more resistant to being turned inside out at high RPM). If you've ever raced a rotary, you'll know the heartache of throwing fan belts at high RPM. Multi Vee belts do not do this.

Lastly - reduced rotating mass (eg lighter pulleys) do NOT give more power. That is a fallacy!! At best, they will make the engine free rev quicker.

I'm not a fan of EWP's (have heard horror stories from people who have spent many years in racing circles). Each to their own through, as I know a lot of people use them happily in racing. I won't try and force my opinion on that topic onto others.

^ spot on to the post above - no power will be gained - the engine will still be the same. You will be taking load of the engine - which will help response - but I imagine the response gains will be tiny for the money spent.

But if budget is not a concern definately go for it. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...