Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bah those rims either have crap offset with spacers or they are 7" wide with spacers

The spokes on 7s are flush with the lip.

some good 17x9 +20 would fit nicely with no spacers and the spokes sit a good inch inside the lip.

Gen 2 advans would be even better or RA3-DTs

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine are 18x9.5 with 265/35s. dished. gen 2...pretty sure.

iunno.

I hate them.

i would buy them off you if they were 17s

are you sure you have Gen 2s, coz Gen 2 have the spokes bolted to the dish.

i'm sure you would have Version 2s but not Gen 2s

whats the offset on yours anyway? i'm guessing +35 or +38, coz +20 would stick out nicely

It will stay black for now :D I love black cars.

If I run into a lot of money I might go bayside blue or VE green.

Yeah cool!

LEAVE IT BLACK! :D

yay dont have to drive my POS thing lol

Man we still need some pics of your R32 with the new wheels.

Seen it done many times. Very nice.

NewZ3.JPG

NewZ8.JPG

Not bad, KEEP IT BLACK :(

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...