Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

DYNO RESULT:

This is the email Beno sent me when the car was ready for pickup. I will let someone who knows about GTRs summarise what the RB28 V Cam feels like on the road:

Ben writes:

Hi Matt,

Car is final tuned now and the result is quite awesome.

Best road R34 GTR I have driven.

It makes 412kw @1.5bar.

Super smooth and mega responsive on the road.

Sounds great - cruises quiet as a mouse,

but step on the gas and it howls like the Mines R34GTR !

You are going to love this thing.

cheers,

Ben

The all important dyno graphs:

RB26 NUR vs RB28

dscf0092r.jpg

RB28 Power vs Boost:

dscf0094h.jpg

RB28 Power vs Lambda:

dscf0095x.jpg

Will post pictures of car this afternoon. Need to clean car first!

Awome build mate is a credit to yourself and race pace. Is always good to see cars built to such a high quality satndard

(parts and workmanship included). Would no doubt be one of the best road cars doing the rounds. As richard (beerbaron) said I cant fault the combo you have gone for. I can only wish the budget would allow for a v cam set up for my own car as an RB28 with Vcam and set of HKS 25/30 or GTRS would be the ultimate combo in my personal opinion.

Great result Matt. Thanks for the comparison of the RB26-RB28 too. You can see where the added displacement and vcam fix the dip in the power delivery as it climbs onto boost.

Do you have a sheet with the torque figures?

Thanks for compliments everyone!

9krpm Posted Today, 07:40 PM

What else has been done to the head beside the vcam mate?

I am led to believe that the head has received no modifications, no porting and polishing. But there could have been some 'secret sneaky tricks' done that Racepace did not divulge.

GTRNUR Posted Today, 08:12 PM

Do you have a sheet with the torque figures?

Sorry, I don't have a sheet for torque figures.

Isn't the torque curve on this graph?

dscf0092r.jpg

It's interesting where the power and torque curve intersect.

Very typical of a variable valve; it's similar to my turbo honda s2k dyno.

It would be nice to have rpm on the x-axis but I am just being picky :D

It's great to have a tuner/workshop that is dedicated to his work and customer service by sending you all of these information after his work.

Unlike a place that I've been to, I had to chase it up for weeks and still failed to get a final dyno run.

Needless to say I and my friends won't be back there in a hurry :banana:

:P for racepace ;)

Edited by 9krpm

wow... that's a power curve to make anyone jealous! can't imagine how good it feels on the road... power and boost curves are really linear, makes it far easier to drive fast

it looks the goods as well... those Z Tune guards are sooo nice

Could anyone enlighten me on how to interpret the power vs lambda graph. What is considered a safe tune?

Cheers

Matt

Matt,

To get the air fuel ratio you just multiply the lambda by the Stoich ratio (14:7) for petrol. In your tune the Lambda is showing about 0.82 which is about 12:1, which is spot on. My engine runs the same number and has had the living bjesus belted out of it for nearly 2 years.

Regards

Andrew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...