Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest 33GTS25

not happy jan

can you imagine spending $600,000 and receiving this notice

this was on the lambo website :evil:

Murcielago Recall / Campaign information

Campaign number 02 v 082 - April 2002

Date: 3/29/02

Vehicle: 2002 Lamborghini Murcielago - Steering Shaft Coupling Clearance

-----------------------------------------

Automobili Lamborghini S.P.A. has determined that a defect which relates to motor vehicle safety exists in early production 2002 Murcielago models.

The lower steering column shaft coupling could seperate from the input shaft of the lower steering rack assembly becasue the steering coupler was not properly inserted onto the steering rack input shaft. This could cause the driver to lose the ability to control the vehicle resulting in a crash and possible occupant injury.

DO NOT DRIVE YOUR VEHICLE UNTIL YOUR AUTHORIZED DEALER HAS DONE THE INSPECTION.

DO NOT DRIVE IT TO THE DEALERSHIP TO HAVE THIS CAMPAIGN DONE, HAVE IT TOWED FOR SAFETY.

Vehicles affected

Lamborghini Murcielago, model year 2002

VIN: ZA9BC10U72LA12049 to ZA9BC10U92LA12104

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288-murcielago-recall/
Share on other sites

Guest 33GTS25

ryan, the murcielago replaces the diablo

if you are keen on bulls and looking for info on all the lambos ever built

try, www.lambocars.com www.lamborghinilist.com or www.lamborghiniregistry.com

lambo cars has the best information and roman updates the site very regularly

did you know there was a TT version of the diablo of which only six were ever built for american distribution only but there was a seventh built by al bertoni

now look what you've done you got me started on lambos and i could sit here and rant on all day

check out the sites you will be lost for hours

rod

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288-murcielago-recall/#findComment-9936
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
    • It does when you start adding everything else in. But it's not just compute. It's the logic. Getting your timing right (I'm not meaning ignition timing for the engine). Making sure of your memory mappings, seeing your interrupts. Microcontroller devices only have so much capacity. For the most part, you want all those timers and interrupts in use on your engine control, which means you're left with less than ideal methods for timing and management of other control functions.   Let's put it this way, my job is all about building custom hardware, that goes into cars, and integrates with them. We're also waiting on a media confirmation from SpaceX too fora world first we've just completed with them in NZ too. It's not just the little toys I play with. But you know, you can think and believe what you want.
    • I don't think it's a good buy, the trend looks bad     lol.
×
×
  • Create New...