Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone see todays Eastern Creek round?

Russel Ingall is a disgrace! The fact that he punted Skaife is bad enough, then the next lap he felt the need to swerve off the racing line towards Skaife by the side of the road... my thoughts are he should be reamed by the officials.

I conceed Skaife should have immediatley jumped over the wall, and wasnt doing the right thing either, but Ingalls actions were far worse then Skaifes.

Congrats to Ambrose and Ford, will be good to see some more competitive Ford teams next year.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, I half agree.

The original incident when skaife spun off and hit the wall was fair racing....skaife had come across on him and pushed him off the track on the exit of the corner...no problems with that, ingall steered back into skaife (as you would!) It resulted in skaife spinning of but imho that was just bad luck - stewards got it right...racing incident.

On the other hand, both Skaife and Ingall were way out of line with the confrontation afterwards. I hope they both get big fines for that sort of behaviour.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-593742
Share on other sites

The original incident when skaife spun off and hit the wall was fair racing....skaife had come across on him and pushed him off the track on the exit of the corner...no problems with that, ingall steered back into skaife (as you would!)  It resulted in skaife spinning of but imho that was just bad luck - stewards got it right...racing incident.
I disagree with that.

Skaife (whom I have been following since the Amaroo Park days) gave Ingall plenty of room through the corner, as always Ingall went out onto the extra concrete on the exit of the corner (as drivers always do on that corner) then Ch10 switched to the head-on camera and Ingall had well over a foot of tarmac to his left (the wall side of the track) and then he thought it would be a great idea to steer into Skaife which you all seen the results of.

I'm quite surprised that Skaife kept a cool head about it when he was back in the SBR pit garage. I would have been throwing things around and hirting people because what Ingall did was totally uncalled for especially when for Skaife it meant finishing either 2nd or 3rd in the Championship where as for Ingall it was either 4th or 4th.

Thankgod I stayed home instead of going to EC to watch because I certainly would have had a handfull of something to throw at the 2nd SBR car thats for sure.

Ingall is an aggressive wanker on the track and a complete airhead off the track.

Don't forget 11:05pm, Dec 1st on Ch10.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-593779
Share on other sites

****en oath! he hadnt done his second compulsory pit and skaife had been behind him for ages flashing his lights and trying to get passed. you can see by the way ingall's car swerved across the track after skaife spun out how hard he was turning into skaife when he clearly had plenty of room. racing incident my ass!!!! when is v8 superstars on that will be interesting...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-593837
Share on other sites

I'm spewing I missed a round! :spew: Ingall has always been over argessive on the track, i say sipping a beer from my HRT stubbie holder signed by the affore mentioned and Larry Perkins, Skaife, on the other hand is always well composed on and off the track. And he used to drive a GTR, can't wait for sports tonight :fight!:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-593846
Share on other sites

The cookies have crumbled...

Skaife - $10,000 fine

Ingal - $15,000 fine

And both drivers have copped a suspension, the terms of which i dont fully know.

I have no trouble with Skaife copping the fine, but Ingall's fine should perhaps be a little more considering his actions when behind the wheel of a racecar swerving towards someone on the infield.

I have never been a fan of Ingall, his passing moves often involve a bit too much rubbing, ruining others races, but the big thing is he doesnt know when the fight is lost.

I feel the move was fair with a bit of rubbing, and each driver giving each other enough room, UNTIL well out of the corner exit and each car having 4 wheels on the blackstuff, Ingall decided to move over on Skaife. Ingall was sunk, he was never going to come back from that position on the outside coming up to turn 10.

Ingalls driving let his ego and frustrations dictate his actions! He was out of line, and i have trouble seeing that as a racing incident, if it happened earlier on corner exit or with Ingall on the white curbing, perhaps i would have deemed it a racing incident, but it was too far down the road. If that had been Lowndes/Ambrose/Richards/Murphy etc on the outside i doubt it would have ended in the same manner.

I think even Ross Stone was a little embaressed by the whole thing.

Oh and anyone else remember Ingalls actions at the Queensland Raceway a few years back when on the straight he swerved and forced a back marker off the track? All because he slwed his entry on to the straight!

The guy is a liability on the track, and off the track, well the V8 Superstar shows dont do him any favours.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-594297
Share on other sites

3 race suspension, i hope that a suspended penalty. Id hate to think Skaifes season is sunk before it is even started.

I want to see the telemetry or in car footage from Ingalls car to see his steering inputs. You think back to Murphy's drive thru penalty for his accident with Lowndes at Winton, and then consider Ingall didnt get anything for that accident? Perhaps the telemetry tells us something that the cameras hide, they would want to, otherwise the stewards have got it very wrong.

Im with benm, im glad i wasnt there, i would have thrown full VB stubbies at Ingalls car, then i would have shot his dog, pissed in his radiator, put a horses head in his bed, and given his wife photos of Ingall in compromising positions with sheep!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-594306
Share on other sites

The cookies have crumbled...

Skaife - $10,000 fine

Ingal - $15,000 fine

Geeze thats fair, Skaife pulls off a legal pass and gets his car slammed into the wall and is out of the race. Ingall deliberately smashes a car off the road and then deliberately swerves at a driver on the side of the road.

Does anyone know if its 3 race meetings or just 3 races? If its 3 meetings then both of those guys can kiss goodbye to the Championship for 2004.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-594307
Share on other sites

nice one ****jockey's. the people making those decisions need to realise they are in the entertainment business as well. if they make pathetic decisions like that its going to have an impact on the sport. especially when the decision screws over probably the most popular and most religiously followed team/driver in the competition.

ingall definitely gets my sportsmanship award. do us a favour and retire already you dirty little man.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28801-ingall-is-a-tool/#findComment-594347
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks! Will get it looked at before winter 🥶 other than that she's a mint ride love it aye 
    • FWIW a lot of the local owners that do a big build tend to have cars that are perpetually broken. 
    • I just got this system but haven’t installed yet I got a Moroso sealed box (defect reasons) which will be set up same as their pic The quality is high grade, the correspondence I had with the owner (former head designer for Rockford Fosgate) was unbelievable, guiding me with what I needed. Even told me not to buy some things as it could be sorted in a different way at his loss. Just a bit of a bite with the exchange rate and don’t purchase gear in 1 hit that goes over $1,000 au, lol I forgot!  
    • Thanks mate for that reply. Very helpful.    it’s a 2022 400R so would most likely lose those features as you say.     I did a quick compare of a rv37 nav and heading for sale in Japan to q50 model. I’ll pop pics below. Seems  Japan spec head into top, nav unit second below it   below pic Q50 aud delivered     differences seem to be Aus delivered has a different plug top left hand side of head unit- not sure what and where it goes.   and nav unit Japanese tv37 had an extra plug put    Again I’m really not sure what each of these differences mean!       the actual plugs on a v37 and q50 screens look identical on both screens… pics below for comparing. (One screen was is a us delivered one) but should be same gps signals etc as Australia.    If it were as simple as swapping a nav unit from q50 aud delivered im interested -just want to figure out what the missing plug is for before spending big $ on a second hand part for it to not work, and I guess with the head unit, if the band expander does the job (I got a 20mHz so should get the range I’m after) so should narrow my issue down to nav unit only.  I’d love to know what the extra cable on rv37 does and if I eliminate that part what it’ll do to the setup,    and also, if I can figure out what that head unit plug difference is, what does that cable do and where does it got can it be altered or re-plugged?! Excuse my ignorance what is ACP/AA, what does that stand for? (Apple car play? Android air play)? so If I swapped head units to save using a band expander, I’d likely lose those better features to have an oem Unit operational. Better to use a band expander and retain AirPlay options and newer version of head unit     provably best to band expand it, and focus on the nav unit. th isn’t  a big deal/ would be cool to have it working  from what I can tel we use a PAL Signal and Japan uses a NTSC signal  I don’t know if there’s a co better or if the screen only reads NTSC, or if it’s the tv module that needs replacing… no big deal don’t need it but more of a curiosity thing on that!   Thanks for the info re tyre sensors, helpful and great to know.  I was reading the online manual off Japan website and it seemed to make it sound more confusing than it is  I guess a rim replacement would require the sensors to be moved to a new rim to carry that option over?!     Thanks for the info regarding diagnostic mode. I appreciate your help mate. Trying to brainstorm here to find a solution to get as much gadgets as I can working! I plan to get my local Nissan tech to have a look too who used to be at an Infiniti dealer back in the day to see if any thing they have or idea can find a soliton. But hoping anyone here has gone down the same route to make life easier!!   i guess identifying the cable/plug differences and what they do would be a great way of finding out if the units are transferable    thanks again 
    • No idea about the remote start part. If the V37 nav is anything like other Nissan JDM vehicles, you can't get the factory Japanese nav working in australia, a card from a different car almost certainly won't work, those cards are usually matched to the serial number of the DCU.  You could be possibly swap out the components from a AuDM Q50 to get it working, but if this is a new model (2021+) 400R, then you will lose the newer features like ACP/AA.  That said, if you have ACP/AA, just use google maps.. I assume a band expander would be required to get the local radio stations, but don't forget the Japanese FM band is narrower than ours, so you still might not be able to receive all Australian stations. I can't see any reason the tyre pressure sensors won't work here, there is the sensor unit inside the rim and the receiver nearby in the wheel well.  I have never had to change the batteries on my 2015 Q50, so I assume they last quite a while.  A straight battery change shouldn't need them to be re-registered as they are the same unit, that should only be required if you replace a sensor with a new one.   Word of warning, if you ever go into the 'secret' diagnostics mode on the main screen, DO NOT EVER do a 'reset' in this menu, it will erase all of your model specific data in the DCU and you will need a trip to a dealer to re-program it all, which would be particularly painful being an import.  This applies to the AuDM Q50 too.
×
×
  • Create New...