Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone interested might like to pick up a copy. Entertaining reading. Apparently all cars have been modded, some seriously (however the GTR ran basically stock times at the 1/4 mile, despite being tuned...). They ran some laps of Oran Park too... The GTR was beaten by the GT2 and Porsche by 0.5s and 0.2s respectively. The thing is, the GT2 was running hoosier r6's (basically slicks) and the Turbo was runninng Formula R Toyos. The GTR was running the OEM Bridgestones.... Why you would install $50k in mods and then run standard bridgestones isnt quite reality (if you're seriously interested in lap times that is). i know for a fact that the bridgestones are 2 seconds slower than r-specs on the GP circuit, which would easily translate into 1 second on south. Anyway, interesting reading nonetheless, but i reckon the GTR would have easily beaten the South times with equivilent tyres. In fact, i reckon even a standard GTR would have kicked the modded GT2 and Turbo's arses collectively, given the same tyres. Amazing really, given the price!

Edited by LSX-438
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288705-motor-magazine-extreme-tuners/
Share on other sites

I had just a quick flick through at the shop and noticed the power output listed of the "modified" GT-R... 258awkW estimated.

Don't they come with near 300awkW as standard? What are they doing?? :)

That car would've had somewhere approaching 345 at the wheels. They must have had Dyno dramas with it and stuffed up the estimate. I was surprised how slow it was given these mods. White 35 has 345 at the wheels and is pulling 3.3 0 - 100. Duncan did a 11.1 quarter mile in his with similar mods. My Mods were also a lot cheaper, and produced much better results also.

Maybe they babied the car, or it was hot, or boost was turned low...or something.

It says somewhere in the article they had dramas removing the carbon undertray which meant they couldnt dyno the car, probably due to clearance issues (or maybe they didnt want to get it dirty, lol). Maybe it has an aftermarket undertray? anyway i removed my complete undertray in my garage with $2 tools, so dunno what's up with that. And yeah it should have about 340awkw. Their estimates are a bit rubbery. Interesting article though.

I have the mag,

Reasons for slow times are due to the owner not letting them use launch control and as mentioned above stock rubber.

Hardly seems worth while entering a car in that type of comp then saying no to using all the gizmos on the car like launch control.

FYI check out the Golf R32 that city performance entered, $70k in mods, bloody crazy.

Yeah, that guy's letter in the August issue (Porshe choice) got me fired up & thought

I would say something! They always cut down the text though & made it read a bit nicer

than what I put down - haha. I suppose the response was that they printed it (my 2nd time)

Its a shame Willall couldnt get the Silver R35 with the Turbo upgrade in that shootout -

that would have been quite interesting. Nice body parts & all the internal goodies as well.

Yes it was a good article. Motor have been doing lots of "tuner" articles over the last few

years & it is the only magazine I buy regularly.

I agree about the launch - whats the point in putting it in but saying dont go for it?

Surely one or two full launches wont hurt it ( ah hem.. I have done a few with my full

JDM launch control with no problems)

I have the mag,

Reasons for slow times are due to the owner not letting them use launch control and as mentioned above stock rubber.

Hardly seems worth while entering a car in that type of comp then saying no to using all the gizmos on the car like launch control.

FYI check out the Golf R32 that city performance entered, $70k in mods, bloody crazy.

Overly careful owners like that does not help the erroneous belief being passed around by GTR 'haters' that the GTR's transmission is 'fragile'

Surely one LC will not hurt the transmission - especially when it's the revised LC where warranty is not void so long as VDC is not turned off. :ninja:

I had just a quick flick through at the shop and noticed the power output listed of the "modified" GT-R... 258awkW estimated.

Don't they come with near 300awkW as standard? What are they doing?? :)

From my memory of that article their estimates were based on a 30% drivetrain loss.....which sounds unusually high...obviously resulting in the lower rwks.

Willall just dynoed my R35 JDM on their 4 wheel dyno & it made 278 awkw standard.

Now waiting for results from new custom COBB tune with boost control. It is not unusual

for cars to vary on power level depending on kays & type of dyno used.

Willall just dynoed my R35 JDM on their 4 wheel dyno & it made 278 awkw standard.

Now waiting for results from new custom COBB tune with boost control. It is not unusual

for cars to vary on power level depending on kays & type of dyno used.

what was the boost level?

  • 1 month later...

Some of you may remember this shootout. An R35, with apparently $50k in mods, ran a 46.7 around Oran Park South. It was running the stocker bridgestone tyres. I think it was John Bowe driving. Compared to a 911T running 888's (46.5) and a GT2 running Hoosier A6's - which are essentially slicks, running the best time of 46.2.... ALL cars had various mods. The tyre thing gave me the shits though (i mean really, a GT2 on slicks vs an R35 on stocker bridgestones).

Anyway, i had a chance to run Oran Park South in my R35 with slicks recently....

Result=46.3

Now, i dont have $50k in mods, and i am not John Bowe. I have less than $10k in mods (Willall midpipe, tune, 18" wheels and tyres). In fact, it's about $5k really, as i was using cheapie 2nd hand slicks on the day. Michelin p-cup 270/68/18's.

What does this tell us?

a) The GTR is one awesome machine, proven capable and comparable to the 911T and GT2 at a fraction of the cost.

b) You dont need to spend $50k on mods, in fact you'll probably make it go slower (if done merely for bling factor)

c) For track excursions, the No.1 most important mod is... TYRES.

Edited by LSX-438
Some of you may remember this shootout. An R35, with apparently $50k in mods, ran a 46.7 around Oran Park South. It was running the stocker bridgestone tyres. I think it was John Bowe driving. Compared to a 911T running 888's (46.5) and a GT2 running Hoosier A6's - which are essentially slicks, running the best time of 46.2.... ALL cars had various mods. The tyre thing gave me the shits though (i mean really, a GT2 on slicks vs an R35 on stocker bridgestones).

Anyway, i had a chance to run Oran Park South in my R35 with slicks recently....

Result=46.3

Now, i dont have $50k in mods, and i am not John Bowe. I have less than $10k in mods (Willall midpipe, tune, 18" wheels and tyres). In fact, it's about $5k really, as i was using cheapie 2nd hand slicks on the day. Michelin p-cup 270/68/18's.

What does this tell us?

a) The GTR is one awesome machine, proven capable and comparable to the 911T and GT2 at a fraction of the cost.

b) You dont need to spend $50k on mods, in fact you'll probably make it go slower (if done merely for bling factor)

c) For track excursions, the No.1 most important mod is... TYRES.

Agreed, in fact I have 19 inch Volks on the way wrapped in Hoosiers - look out Bathurst a two twenty something is in my sights...

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • 255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
×
×
  • Create New...