Jump to content
SAU Community

Sportauto C6 Corvette Zr1 Supertest Results


Recommended Posts

c/o nagtroc

Results: ZR1 (GT-R)

Acceleration

0-100km/h: 4.0s (4.1s)

0-200km/h: 11.4s (13.1s)

Nordschleife

Peak lateral g: 1.6g (1.45g)

Straight Vmax: 288km/h (276km/h)

Lap Time: 7:38 (7:38)

Note: The GT-R is 10-12km/h faster than the ZR1 through difficult technical sections

just not on the straight.

so the original 7:38 time has been replicated by a car mag, surprise surprise.

- who was driving?

Makes you wonder how/why Porsche test drivers just couldnt do better than a 7:54 in a GTR

oh hang on, no need to wonder, it's actually pretty obvious really :D

c/o nagtroc

Results: ZR1 (GT-R)

Acceleration

0-100km/h: 4.0s (4.1s)

0-200km/h: 11.4s (13.1s)

Nordschleife

Peak lateral g: 1.6g (1.45g)

Straight Vmax: 288km/h (276km/h)

Lap Time: 7:38 (7:38)

Note: The GT-R is 10-12km/h faster than the ZR1 through difficult technical sections

just not on the straight.

0-100 km/h times for both cars are a bit on the tardy side, but as expected 0-200 km/h ZR-1 has a clear advantage. It shoould be no suprise that they recorded the same lap time since the best times both have acheived are almost identical (7.26's). This should prove to many of the GT-R knockers that the GT-R is what Nissan claim it to be. There is no shortage of Amercian car journo's and Corvette fans who claim the GT-R is a fake. This test proves it runs with their ZR-1. Also proves to Porsche that it's quicker than the 7.54min time they achieved.

7.38min is very quick but the factory drivers must be special to find the 12 seconds! Still it proves thru most performance parameters the GT-R and Zr-1 are about the same. At the end of the day GT-R has 4 seats, a decent boot and AWD to get you home safely in wet and damp conditions, it costs less, has a better interior and for me a better exterior. The Vette sounds glorious tho and is more low slung beast.

so the original 7:38 time has been replicated by a car mag, surprise surprise.

- who was driving?

Makes you wonder how/why Porsche test drivers just couldnt do better than a 7:54 in a GTR

oh hang on, no need to wonder, it's actually pretty obvious really :D

Both laps were driven by the mag editor, Horst von Saurma as is normal for most Supertest laps.

Sportauto's numbers for the 911 turbo make the whole Porsche/Nissan debarcle even more interesting.

Acceleration

0-100km/h: 3.8s

0-200km/h: 12.6s

Nordschleife

Straight Vmax: 282km/h

Lap Time : 7:54 (!!!!!)

and this particular 911T that Sportauto received was shod with Pilot Sport Cups and PCCBs

Over such a distance. Does anyone know roughly how much quicker the GT-R would be with carbon brakes on board?

My guess is that it would be the same. The 'ring' is not a track that is particularly hard on the brakes. steel rotors are just as effective as carbon ceramic in terms of stopping power - so long as they remain cool. One or two laps on the 'ring' is not enough to overheat steel rotors.

Edited by skyline_man
7.38min is very quick but the factory drivers must be special to find the 12 seconds!

On a circuit so long it would be near impossible to do a perfect lap ever, so 12seconds over 7+ minutes should be possible, considering Nissan's chief test driver has a lot of racing pedigree, including Formula 1.

There are too many factors involved that could impact both track conditions and also the car's performance. Thats why this is important to have the two cars run back to back on the same day. Its a more fair comparison. Use the other 'ring times as just an indication of each car's "best run so far".

Calling it "best lap so far" rather then "fastest" sounds like a good idea. Considering as you said track conditions, where 2 days there can "look" the same but the conditions are different.

More and more i want to plan a trip over to hire a car and go mental. mmm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...