Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Has anybody had experience with using an LC-1 wb O2 sensor with a power FC? I don't have a datalogit though this might happen in the future. I know that with the datalogit you can connect the LC-1 to the Power FC. But without it what is the best practice? I assume since you only have the 1 wb sensor you would plumb it into the front pipe after the 2 pipes merge. Leave the standard NB O2 sensors in place but unplug them and use the analogue outputs from the LC-1 to drive the O2 inputs? Sound about right?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/289613-innovate-lc-1-and-power-fc/
Share on other sites

no you cant feed a wideband 02 sensor input into the PFC

you could use a wideband <-> narrowband converter for the 02 sensor signal but that would defeat the purpose

you either have the wideband 02 sensor runing to a wideband 02 gauge or to a digital input on the ECU

in order to drive it to the PFC correctly you need datalogit and plug it into one of the 5v digitla inputs

then you can plot and log digital 5v input from the wideband sensor onto the maps and lots for tuning

I was under the impression the LC-1 was able to output a narrow band output. The powerFC will not be able to use a wideband without the datalogit. I was planning on using this output to still drive the powerFC so it still has closed loop mode. While using the wideband to drive a AFR gauge and hooking up to a computer while tuning the powerFC. I guess what I was asking is wouldn't it be better to use the LC-1 as a wideband to narrowband converter rather than use the 2 standard O2 sensors that way you would only be really running 1 O2 sensor instead of 3.

Cheers

Another concern I had was going from 2 standard O2 sensors to 1. I know on V6 and V8s they run 2 but this would be because they have dual exhausts where as the GTR has 2 outlets that merge. Is there any advantage on the GTR to running 2 O2 sensors? From what I understand the standard O2 sensors cost about $150 each and should be replaced every 40k. For $300 wouldn't you be better off getting the LC-1 and gauge. It is a bit more work initially to get your front pipe modified but after that isn't this a more ecconomical and superior setup?

Please correct me if I am misguided I just can't figure out why anybody would bother replacing their standard O2 sensors if for a fraction more and a bit of work they can have a superior setup that will be cheaper and probably less problematic in the long run.

Thanks

yes sorry, i missed that you can run the narrow output from the wideband sensor/unit into the PFC (or any other stock style ECU) and let the ECU run its normal closed loop etc. the GTR PFC grabs the two 02 sensors and averages them, so you can parrellel it up no problems. it just has two sensors, as you said, likely because it has two exhaust outlets, so pick the average from both

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
    • from an old insurance company i was with (Budget Direct) I had someone roll back into me at the lights got them to pull over. Got a picture of thier licence with address, had a dash cam video and, thier phone number. But only had 3rd party on the shitbox i was driving. insurance did nothing, cops wouldn't do anything due to the value of the damage (under $3000) so i just had to suck it up and go to U Pull It. 
    • Small Update on the Exhaust Situation A 200-cell cat was a bit too expensive for now, so I had the exhaust shop fabricate a new exhaust from the cat to the rear and an exhaust tip. I went this route to avoid cutting into the original exhaust and keep it intact. It’s essentially straight-piped, and the sound is noticeably different. The exhaust tip came with a silencer, so if it gets too loud, I can easily install it to tone things down slightly. Right now, the car bangs and pops like crazy -- which I personally love. In the future, I might add a resonator or a 200-cell cat, as niZmO_Man suggested, but for now, I’m really happy with how it turned out.  
    • And that's a massive problem, because deadshits will deadshit and give you false details. At least in these days of mobile cameraphones, it is trivial to take photos of any ID they are carrying at the same time as the 300 photo extensive documentation of the state of the vehicles that I recommend even for minor incidents. And you get photos of the person's face, any visible tatoos, etc etc, while you're at it. Then you try to avoid mentioning that you're fully capable of making explosives of various power levels and will wreck their shit if you are forced to hunt them down.
×
×
  • Create New...