Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Which brand would you recommend ?  

:headspin:   :D  :headspin:

this ones easy .. ohlins .. if u can find them :) .. if not then go for bilsteins or konis as they are much easier to find ... also go for them if u prefer a softer suspension cause japs are hard as!! ;) thats just my opinion :D

whiteline has a new series of coil overs for sale now, i think the R33 coils are almost out.

it looks like they are trying to provide features from more expensive damper sets in a reasonable package.

from memory, it uses 40mm shock, height and damper adjustable from the top, so u only need to open the bonnet etc to adjust, and they say that you dont need to do regular services. also the shock is inverted.

retails for $3000

Its true most jap brand coilovers are way too hard for our inferior aussie roads, ive fitted bilsteins some 15mths ago and can only speak to highly of them.They can be revalved and maintained in nearly all states that i know of and quite reasonably priced in purchase and maintenance.The other big advantage that bilstein, koni, and ohlins have over the japenese brand name is that most of these have had thorough testing done on them in aust for aussie conditions and as such are deemed legal,where as the jap ones havent been tested or adr. approved!!!

Regards,

SKYLINE....

Hi HKSgtst, Bilsteins have adjustable (via circlip) lower spring seats so you can have it whatever height you like. Tip, I always have extra grooves cut in the shock body to accommodate a wider range of heights.

I would use Whiteline springs rather than Kings. It has been my experience that, since Kings only make springs, they try and do everything with the spring rate and this results in some excessive rates and rate transition. Whiteline also make stabilsier bars and alignment products so they don't try and make a spring do stuff that it is not intended to do.

Hope that helps

Hi GTRman1992, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with the Kings product itself. We use Kings springs in some of our race cars. But I specify the springs rates, to suit the tyres, the stabiliser bar rates, the damper rates, the circuit, whether the circuit is wet, dry or slippery etc etc.

When they do an off the shelf road car spring, they don't know if you have done any of this to your car. So how do they know what spring rate to give you? They guess, they have a philosophy they follow.

It has been my experience that they assume you are not upgrading the stabiliser bars and therefore specify a higher a spring rate than someone else who assumes you will (or have) upgraded the stabiliser bars. Kings don't make stabiliser bars, in fact if you ring them up and ask them, they will tell you that their springs are designed so that you don't need a stabiliser bar upgrade.

This is of course nonsense, a spring and a stabiliser bar don't do the same job. The spring’s primary job is to hold the car up and a stabiliser bar’s primary job is to control roll by linking wheels on the same axle. If you try and control roll only using springs, you will have too high a spring rate. The handling and ride will both suffer.

So I use a company that has a philosophy of complete and complimentary suspension components. At the moment that is Whiteline, they also make stabiliser bars and have a large range of alignment products, body braces, shocks etc. So their philosophy is not one of "springs are everything". A handling package is an integrated group of components that will always make a car handle and ride better than one single component trying to do it all.

Bottom line, it's not the quality of the product itself, it is all about what the designer had in mind when he specified the product.

Hope that helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a way to adjust all of the pedals in an R32 GTS-T? they all sit even, but seem to be a little high for my liking.
    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
×
×
  • Create New...