Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I have a bit of an odd question. My fun car is a Ford 4.0litre Straight 6 twin turbo Falcon. The current turbo setup is twin R33 N1 GTR turbo's, now I am looking at upgrading and below are my listed options.

GT2860r -10

GT2660r -5

Hi flow the R33 N1 turbo's (questionable)

Now my problem is that I get fully boost @ 2200rpm which is great, but I want more top end and I don't want to lose much of the response.

So my questions are which of you guys have the following upgraded turbo's on your vehicle/s, when do you get full boost?

Is your engine stroked or stock 2.6?

Cams?

So basely what I am trying to work out is for "example" if someone gets fully boost on a stock 2.6 GTR with R33 N1 @ 4500rpm and with the same setup someone gets full boost using GT2860r -5/-10 @ 4700rpm, that's 200rpm difference give or take. Then you add 200rpm onto my 2200rpm = 2400rpm full boost......Winner!! :)

Keeping in mind I know that this isn't as simple as it looks, it's just to give me an idea. Also I have searched the forums with some results, but nothing that would make my mind up.

Thanks.

Edited by Revenge
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290263-boost-response-help/
Share on other sites

What is full boost?

I love that statement :) 10psi? 20psi? what?

Going from GTR N1's to -5's is (at a guess) what you are after.

They spool a bit later than N1's, but make near on 100rwkw more give/take. Your probably talking.

So you'll make 400rwkw without much of a worry... 33 GTR N1's aren't the best turbo either, bit laggy so they would spool maybe a tad earlier than -5's, but not by a lot.

32 N1 are dreadful

33 N1 are not too bad

34 N1 are the best of them all (simlar to a -9/GT-SS turbo), so 330rwkw with pretty good response.

I mean on my 2.6ltr im making boost in the 2000rpm range and under load 3300rpm im making i think 15-16psi on GT-SS's (hard to tell, my 20yr old gauge is not so good)

IMO the -10's are too big... Unless you are after 450rwkw+ then they are not what you want to look towards. If you are after that kinda power then ye, go for them but they will be noticeably laggy compared to N1 turbos.

will the coon block be able to handle that much power?

my mate used to be into the boosted fords.. actually he still is. and he had big issues with splitting the blocks. he has split many of them :down:

good luck with it though. maybe 2 x rb25 turbo's would do you some good?

can you upload some pics of your car, im interested in checking it out

will the coon block be able to handle that much power?

my mate used to be into the boosted fords.. actually he still is. and he had big issues with splitting the blocks. he has split many of them :down:

Which falcon block/s are you taking about? The ford block I am using is 1989-1994 SOHC not the newer Barra engine. AU blocks are crap. You can make around 700bhp (stock internals) give or take depending on your tune keeping in mind the 4.0 block can split around the dizzy so you wouldn't run that amount of HP all the time.

All those turbos are too restrictive in the turbine housings for a 4L engine IMO. I'd go with twin GT2860RS .86's. It's similar to -5 turbos but more free flowing on the exhaust side. A lot more free flowing without choking things up. U can wind in a lot more timing and gain a lot of the response lost back. Also u can make more power on lower boost so better on the engine.

Edited by bradsm87

without a doubt i'd go for the -10's!

im talking from experience, naturally, dont trust everything you read on these forums.

i have these on my gtr which is running a 3.0ltr & its awesome...does not feel laggy what so ever, the exact same opinion was exchanged with my tuner.

in fact, it feels more responsive than when i had my -5s on my 2.6ltr & a lot of ppl here rave about this package & how good the response is (which it is).

to put it simple, my new setup is a torque monster...now imagine this setup on a 4ltr bottom end?

Thanks for the info everyone, I also agree with you Marko and so does my tuner. I just got off the phone with him and -10 are the way to go with minimal lag. I should have really contacted him first before posting on the forums, but I wanted some personal experiences and individual opinions.

My quote so far for -10 is about $2600 a pair I didn’t ask about actuators. Good price??

will the coon block be able to handle that much power?

It's funny cos it's true. Saw a boosted EA at a local dyno one day getting it's first run.

Threw a rod at like 7psi lol.

But to get on topic, I have the -10's currently on my rb30dett and there sweet.

Another vote for -10's.

Which falcon block/s are you taking about? The ford block I am using is 1989-1994 SOHC not the newer Barra engine. AU blocks are crap. You can make around 700bhp (stock internals) give or take depending on your tune keeping in mind the 4.0 block can split around the dizzy so you wouldn't run that amount of HP all the time.

he was using the late model xf blocks... so its a bit older then yours. but i am sure the falcon engines are not very strong for forced induction. they were just not built for this kind of punishment.

*too big*? Remember the falcon engine is really stressing itself revving past 5500rpm... If you work out how much air the engines flow (as in litres*rpm) they are probably pretty similar.

That's complete crap "too big" also a built falcon engine can rev to 6000-6500rpm no worries. Standard form around 5500rpm in the old SOHC, 6000rpm in the newer Barra DOHC setup. Air flow wise a falcon @ 5000rpm for example pushes more air then a 1JZ @ 7000rpm maybe even a 2JZ.

he was using the late model xf blocks... so its a bit older then yours. but i am sure the falcon engines are not very strong for forced induction. they were just not built for this kind of punishment.

The thread really isn't about how strong a falcon block is or isn't, but I will go with it for now. Big turbo falcons have been built for years will staggering straight line performance, massive amounts of torque, user friendly Hp and with the correct tuner and knowledge a standard block can do this. The SOHC 3.9-4.0litre has been getting turbocharged since 1989 around the same time as the Nissan GTR Skyline, falcon's even had a factory turbocharged option using a company called A.I.T, now I can date this even further back around 1983 Ford released a Falcon Grand Prix XE turbo model which used a 4.1litre xflow engine (push rod) and in 1988 Ford released a twin turbo A.I.T Falcon. So unfortunately your comment regarding "but i am sure the falcon engines are not very strong for forced induction. they were just not built for this kind of punishment" is incorrect as Ford has a history of turbocharging falcon's it is just a little unknown unless you are a Ford enthusiast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
    • The odometer does go up when driving.  Does this tell it is an issue with the speedometer itself?    Where can I look for replacement cluster? Or speedo? I can likely do the repair.. Will ER34 cluster work on HR34? Or do I need a HR34 20GT S2 specifically lol   
    • Mine's a bit bigger at 70x150mm roughly. The spots are flat, just can feel the edges if I dig my nail into it. I did fix some other other ones by both using my finger to sand that small spot (I'm a bit wary of doing this and creating hot spots and a bigger mess) and I also did sand over it flat and others, but this also worried me a bit because if I create an overall low spot on the panel on paint that is good.  Correct me if I'm wrong but as long as it's flat even if I can feel the edges, I can put filler because it will all be level once I sand it? I can see myself going in a circle after sanding guidecoat with 320 grit if for example the panel is flat with my hand but because I sanded the guidecoat I could have created a low spot again somewhere. Unless where I'm going wrong is what I mentioned previously where I didn't go low enough on the grits. It's 1 step forward and 2 step backwards here haha. I'll probably need to experiment with it more. Last time I go back to bare metal lol.
×
×
  • Create New...