Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice work ian :D

I think with the tight headshots - it needs more fill and esp fill under the chin and nose. Guess you were just using normal flashes than strobes (so understandable). Just something i learnt from another photographer to do.

With the 3rd last shot the focus is on her nose rather than the eyes. Maybe you were going for that, but im not to sure. Just thought i mention it.

1st shot is great!!

Here's one I took last night (unedited) - I was taking shots of a small fire my cousin had built on his makeshift verandah, and the unexpected extended shutter opening made kind of a "wave"effect with the fire...

IMG_4253.jpg

Here's another one where the fire was burning through the middle of a termite-infested log - the camera didn't quite capture the blue flames that we could see, but meh...

IMG_4266.jpg

I had the dslr out on the weekend when i was out for a ride in the leaves here in Ottawa, Ontario. Canada. Nothing special, just my Stinky with some mods. I've only had my 450D for a few weeks now and haven't really experimented with it too much. Any tips or criticism is welcome!

4007681520_2da86e0f77.jpg

4007682734_c98e0c7348.jpg

7529_154604093755_504263755_2600498_2399118_n.jpg

7529_154604198755_504263755_2600513_2441916_n.jpg

7529_154604213755_504263755_2600514_2123049_n.jpg

First pana attempt

4009627396_290e041aef_b.jpg

Kyle.

Edited by Lv2exlr8

First of all Kyle - cool bike!

Secondly - as for tips/criticism - I'm no pro so don't take this too heart but IMO:

1st one is a bit under exposed/dark, and plant in foreground is a little distracting

I like the 2nd one!

bottom three pics: colours are a bit too intense I think

5th one: whats the smudge? rain drop on lens?

like the pano

here is a hint for anyone doing panoramas,

shoot it portrait instead of landscape, you have more room for error (top and bottom), plus you get a larger picture size once you stitch them all up........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...