Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Anyone who says that semi's are no good on the street really have no idea what there on about. Matt (Whatsisname) has them on his car and he cant believe how good they are either.

I'm thinking it's time for semi's on the street, t1r's are struggling, i'm guessing the ku36's are so cheap because there shit?

Ive looked up the thread on here about the special coating thats on them. Have use throttle body cleaner on them. The coating is still on there as i can see.

Cheers for the heads up tho.

No problem, just giving you the heads up :)

number on front is 49179-53

compressor wheel inlet is 5.5 cm...

looking into it, it seems it will to laggy for drift.

Last question, How many blades on the turbine wheel and measure the exducer on that as well.

P.S. the compressor inducer wouldn't be 52.7mm not 55 would it?

well i think it's an early version (judging by the compressor wheel) of a TD06SH-20G.

It'll be laggy as it's the biggest of the TD06's before you go to a T67. But it's a 330kw turbo.

It's too big for a 20 though, See you should have gone 25. ;)

Edited by D_Stirls

so for track purposes, its not really ideal eh?

im not scared to keep the revs up, and the extra tyre smoke would be kinda cool!

how would i go getting round the coolant lines? join them together?

edit: just seen your edit. i wont bother with it.....

what to get what to get??????????

Edited by craig R33

I'm not sure about that compressor wheel, i can't find anything that even looks close to it and it doesn't look like the current generation of 20G wheels although the inducer specs are very similar to the 20G size.

I have something perfect for you; BRB.

Edited by D_Stirls

Here you go it's a perfect turbo for a 20.

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...howtopic=414681.

You can get 300kw our of this turbo but 260-280kw is more reasonable.

And don't fore get that this is a $1800 turbo when it is new. You might want to change the turbine housing though.

EDIT!! Sorry missed the bit that said that it was sold.....lol

Edited by D_Stirls
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...