Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Adrian i think you will find that a 3082R is going to be fairly laggy, you would have been better off going for a 3076 as they make around the same power but the 76 will be more responsive. A GT3071 is prefect for 250 to 280rwkw. A 3082 has the same compressor size as a GT3582 (unsure of trims though) but with a small GT30 turbine. Garrett don't even have a listing for the 3082 anymore.

P.S. a Gt3082 is the Garrett name for a HKS GT3040

Edited by D_Stirls
  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ROR, overpriced Soccermummobile :)

lol

and nissan australia suck, they canned the TD6 in the series V and VI (unfortunately the last of the original pedigree of patrol :'() and kept the 3.0 grenade motor

cheers guys, the interview felt OK.. always walk out of them thinking of things that i should have said

btw steve, the bp usage meter used to update every hour... now its every 4 hours that could be the cause of your woes

yeah i had a very very light night last night, my old man plays a crappy game called Navyfield as for my only light forum browsing, i really don't DL much maybe a few hours a you tube per week

Adrian i think you will find that a 3082R is going to be fairly laggy, you would have been better off going for a 3076. A 3082 has the same compressor size as a GT3582 (unsure of trims though) but with a small GT30 turbine. Garrett don't even have a listing for the 3082 anymore.

P.S. a Gt3082 is the Garrett name for a HKS GT3040

Swap turbo's Adrian :) problem solved

Adrian i think you will find that a 3082R is going to be fairly laggy, you would have been better off going for a 3076 as they make around the same power but the 76 will be more responsive. A GT3071 is prefect for 250 to 280rwkw. A 3082 has the same compressor size as a GT3582 (unsure of trims though) but with a small GT30 turbine. Garrett don't even have a listing for the 3082 anymore.

P.S. a Gt3082 is the Garrett name for a HKS GT3040

+1 on the above

i used to have the gt3040 with a machined out .54 rb25 housing and that was still laggy, then i went to external gate with a .82 rear and that was even more laggy, you wont start making boost until about 3,800-4,00rpm

i dont think you will get the response u want but u will get a big hit of boost

even with a .63 housing it will still be laggy on a stock motor

Edited by ovrtym33
Swap turbo's Adrian :) problem solved

maybe i wasn't clear with my 3076 high flow i made 235rwkw through a transfer case on 16psi im guessing without transfer it would of made 245rwkw on 16psi

have the braided line kit with it and speed flow fittings

maybe i wasn't clear with my 3076 high flow i made 235rwkw through a transfer case on 16psi im guessing without transfer it would of made 245rwkw on 16psi

have the braided line kit with it and speed flow fittings

Is that a stock 25 turbo high flowed with a 76 compressor?

EDIT!!

Actually is has to be both front and rear wheels as they wouldn't keep the ceramic rear wheel. You should be making a lot more power than that, i would have thought that you'd be making nearer 270kw on 16 psi.

Edited by D_Stirls
yeah Bill at ATS built it meant to be rated for 270rwkw and 25psi

I'd be interested to know what rear wheel he used then, the proper GT3076 is rated to 500BHP. By the sounds of what he rated it to it sounds more like a 71mm compressor.

76mm compressor map;

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...amp;3comp_e.jpg

what were the main differences Matty?

the ZD30 is the 4cyl shared with the navara / pathfinder platforms........kinda the entry level diesel in the range (except it managed to span the whole range from the poverty packs right thru to the luxo model. They had the 4.2 turbodiesel as a higher level entry up until the GU V (mid to late 08). they stopped making the TD42T motor because "nobody was buying them" apparently, but tons of people were cheaping out and buying the 3 litre ones instead. So essentially now (aside from cosmetic changes) the newest models have the 3 litre diesel or the twincam 4.8 petrol 6.

and the reason i say the last of the true pedigree of patrol, ive seen the media releases for the "2010" model. Looks like a pathfinder on steroids, going to can the live axle and go with the trend of IFS, and generally going soft :blush: end of an era if you ask me

the ZD30 is the 4cyl shared with the navara / pathfinder platforms........kinda the entry level diesel in the range (except it managed to span the whole range from the poverty packs right thru to the luxo model. They had the 4.2 turbodiesel as a higher level entry up until the GU V (mid to late 08). they stopped making the TD42T motor because "nobody was buying them" apparently, but tons of people were cheaping out and buying the 3 litre ones instead. So essentially now (aside from cosmetic changes) the newest models have the 3 litre diesel or the twincam 4.8 petrol 6.

and the reason i say the last of the true pedigree of patrol, ive seen the media releases for the "2010" model. Looks like a pathfinder on steroids, going to can the live axle and go with the trend of IFS, and generally going soft :) end of an era if you ask me

oh well Matty, looks like you may have to jump ship.

The new 200's have gone from 4.2L 6cyl Turbodiesel to 4.5L V8 Twin Turbodiesel.....approx 700 Nm of torque with the modified pipes and over 200kw.....not bad for a doozel :blush:

Also maintaining the live rear axle.

oh well Matty, looks like you may have to jump ship.

The new 200's have gone from 4.2L 6cyl Turbodiesel to 4.5L V8 Twin Turbodiesel.....approx 700 Nm of torque with the modified pipes and over 200kw.....not bad for a doozel :)

Also maintaining the live rear axle.

pfft. wont catch me jumping ship, if i did id get a 79 series troopy, may lose a turbo and a bit of power / torque, but its still live axle front

anways, who'd want a toybota :blush: lol

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, thumbsup from me. The distant shot of the bay just looks same-same as before.
    • Dad had a court case drag out with them from 1998 to 2004. He was in a not at fault accident, NRMA were the ones who covered the other person. They tried to blame his neck injuries on the fact he'd had an injury in 1981 on his extreme lower back where he slipped a single disc right near the bottom. Had been all cleared from that injury for years. This accident destroyed his shoulder, and f**ked a heap of discs in his neck, and he still has major problems with it to this day. Sarah's sister while on her L plates had a small Suzuki Alto, she had stopped to give way to an ambulance, and someone changed lanes behind her because there lane was also slowing, and rear ended her at 80km/h. (She had been stopped for a few seconds already too!). Car was completely f**kED. NRMA sent the vehicle around to 3 different workshops as they kept claiming "We believe it can be repaired, and not written off, we just need to find the correct workshop". It took 3 months, and a lot of arguing before they'd concede and wrote it and paid out. About two years later her sister had a Lancer, someone pulled out of a stop sign without stopping (in an 80 zone). Her sister swerved, hit the front of the other persons car (Instead of dead t-boning the drivers door), which ramped her Lancer, and made it roll multiple times down the road. It hit every panel on the way through. Her sister had slid her self out of the car, and remembers the ambos walking to the accident (They'd been sitting at a set of lights just down the road and witnessed it) and they were saying "Well, this ones going to be a fatality, no way you can walk away from that". Well, she did. And then NRMA sent two assessors out to look at the car, both of which wrote it off. They tried to send another assessor out, except a HUGE uproar was raised, and they FINALLY paid it out. That was on a car, that had damage to EVERY panel, you could see from 100m away the whole car was also twisted, roof bowed etc. Nah, we'll try get out of needing to payout on a $10,000 car... Her sister ended up with major shoulder reconstructive surgery being required, and was permanently limited in her ability to do her job as a nurse after that, as she can't (And was told before surgery too this would be guaranteed to happen) regain full strength in that shoulder. However, there was no choice to not have it, as she could barely use her arm, which was her dominant one, and was in near constant major pain. (And she's the type of person that would try and walk off a broken leg!) NRMA did the biggest run around on the personal injury side too for about 18 months, even to the point of trying to put 100% blame of the accident on Sarah's sister, even though the other driver admitted she didn't look, and didn't stop, and was charged by the police. Sarah used to have a Barina insured with them. It was a policy setup, paid all 12 months in advance. At the end of the 12 months, Sarah was living with me, I reviewed the renewal, it clearly stated "If you do nothing, your policy will cease on XYZ date". We did nothing, as we moved her insurance in with all of mine and I was with Shannons. We find out 10 months later, NRMA decided, because he DAD had a car insurance policy at the same address as what Sarah's mailing address was (Garaged address had been changed), that they'd put Sarah's (What should have been non existent policy) onto her Dad's month to month charges on his credit card. We had to jump through hoops, to get a refund. They didn't care that we actually found the letter that said "If you do nothing, your policy will cease" they made us prove we had NON COMPULSORY insurance else where before they'd issue the refund, and after they agreed to the refund, it still took another 6 weeks and 3 more phone calls for them to actually process it. They also had two insurance claims from storm damage, and they were an absolute cluster to get resolved as well (one vehicle, one house). Some how, up until about 3 years ago, her parents were still loyal to NRMA too, and we were like "How the hell are you so loyal to staying with them, when other places are so much cheaper, and they've f**ked you over every time you've ever had to make a claim?"
    • I got the four AN10 fitting welded up to the cam covers and started up making the head to sump breather/drain lines. The front passenger side cover I used a 45 up top and a 90 at the bottom into the stock VCT head drain spot (3/4" BPST to AN10 adapter) thats unused on the RB25DET NEO with some speedflow flame shield to protect it from the manifolds heat.   back passenger side was a 90 up top with some flame shield and 45 at the sump end. The rear drivers is 45 at both ends   the front drivers fitting is capped off for now but ready to go if i want to try moving the breathers around. I was told by the fabricator to leave all the welds raw for now to make sure there are no pin hole leaks. A lot of cleaning up, re bundling looms and degreasing to go as well as final assembly on the cam cover baffles. The first real test will be 28th March at a Circuit event. added complexity and more spots for leaks but overall looks relatively neat imo
    • Yeah i think the dash needs to come out. To get the loom or maybe just climate control and radio cluster. My mirrors are done i think the motors don’t work so well after flood haha i need the ac fan, you said you wanted to keep it for your 31 and interior loom not including boot. The wiper motor. I’m not sure how good the window surrounds are on the exterior on the pintara.  I will message you to get your bank details shortly 
    • Just another barrier put up to stop cars being modified. When we're all driving Chinese sewing machines, you won't want to modify it anyway, and you'll likely already have slashed your wrists and be locked up in a padded room for your own protection.
×
×
  • Create New...