Jump to content
SAU Community

The Sa Wasteland


heslo
 Share

Recommended Posts

then don't buy a ET, they fall apart as steve said

buy a R31 , cheap, use the RB30 someday, parts from wreckers easy to find, etc

mine has over 500,000k on a unopened engine, head seeps a bit of coolant but still idles better then the R34...lol

lol agreed agreed.... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yer Ive got a chicken caesar here to eat today too.

cheap food for a day

paid for the missus to have a holiday. so I thought bugger it, i need a power-fc

bought one from ebay for $690 incl hand controller for the rb26dett, including a tune from JUN (stage 1).

thats the last thing i needed for the r32 sedan.

just got to chop the $1.25 cage up to suit, then tune at boostwerks on 7th april.

must get to it and fit the speedo cable, meh sore too sore :O need a hoist

Could have bought mine for cheaper :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed on the 31 idea.

Whats not to love?

Sharp lines, long life engine, can become a nice sleeper, abundance of parts..

win/win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already posted in the Wanted To Borrow Thread,

But does anyone have access to a car trailer that I could borrow on Saturday for the price of a carton?

I'm located up north east, and would need the trailer 3pm-4pm.

Not sure a hire trailer from the servo is worth $69 for one hour's of usage.

cheer, Nigel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

an abundance jake? really? come on.

No: It's too dangerous

* Dr Helen Caldicott, anti-nuclear activist: “We spend millions of dollars trying to find a cure for cancer, [yet] here’s an industry that will directly propagate that hideous disease. Nuclear power is medically contraindicated.”

ok, cool. so its okay to use readioactive therapy for treating cancer, and xrays are cool, but its not okay to have 3rd and 4th gen nuclear reactors in the middle of butt f**k egypt powering the hospitals with the waste stored even further away than butt f**k egypt?

... okay...?

funnily enough, the nuclear power debate is one that comes up rather frequently at work (we have a fair bit of free time), and the 3 most popular reasons used for the 'no' argument are nuclear proliferation (even though half the people that use this argument dont actually know what it means).

terrorism, which is a pretty slim chance sorta thing considering nuclear reactors around the world have about as much security as your average nuclear weapons storage/production/destruction facility.

(if anyones ever seen 'worlds biggest fixes on discovery, this covered briefly during an episode where theyre repairing a nuclear reactor turbine, probably ex military security wearing military grade armour and carrying m4 carbines in every room of the facility, on top of numerous 'unfakable' security check points).

and finally, nuclear waste storage, some people simply cannot seem to fathom how little room nuclear waste takes up, especially in a country like australia, where such a huge percentage of the continent is suitable (and suitably distant from population centres) for the storage of depleted nuclear materials, and that the vessels used to transport and store said spent fuel have been constantly improved and tweaked since before nuclear power was even an idea.

Edited by scandyflick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share




×
×
  • Create New...