Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd tell you guys of a fcouple of things I've found out about my R34 over the course of owning it.

The tiptronic gearbox in the non-turbo is the same unit as the turbo one has! I'm guessing due to the expense of developing two differnet items for a car that had a limited existance.

I'm yet to confirm this for the non-turbo manual 5 speed, as I don't have access to one to check out.

Also R34's use top-feed injectors for the whole range..from RB20, RB25 to RB26...yet another strange thing.

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29202-strange-things-about-r34s/
Share on other sites

Thats right Sumo, an RB20DE was present in one of the R34 models... and if that doesn`t scare you, there was an RB20E (thats right a single cam!) in the lowest spec R33.

666DAN - Our GTT's (RB25DET) use side feed Injectors, not top feed (see Here) and, at the moment, I can only find one injector upgrade (Nismo 480cc) because they're some kind of special plastic version and therefore R33 ones won't work! (unless you change the fuel rail and/or the resistor packs)

PS

Here's a piccy of an RB20'd R34

bubbleoct0307.jpg

MY old GTS was powered by an RB20E. It wasn't that bad! It wasn't good either, but it was a skyline and it was cheap. So, if I had to guess why Nissan made the Skyline range available with a RB20E I'd say to reduce the cost of the entry model to appeal to more people.

The surprising thing about the skyline is tha although it's a kick-ass sports car, it's also a 4 door family sedan that Grandpa Joe likes driving around in...and granpa Joe usually doesn't care how many cams are under the bonnet... :(

There is actually a name for those rb20e R33's, but i cant remember what it is.  I think it started with "E"  Someone who had one should know.

Eeerm... "Urbanliner"?

There is actually a name for those rb20e R33's, but i cant remember what it is.  I think it started with "E"  Someone who had one should know.

Nissan Skyline "Extremelyslowcarthatlookslikeasportscar"?

But Nismo only supply top-feed aftermarket injectors for the R34 series, as they are the only direct replacements for the factory rail...which is top-feed....go have a look, I've even taken my one out. YES R33 RB25's use side feed...not the R34.

Check this out...

Nismo injectors http://www.takakaira.com/asp/template.asp?...MNnJkKkfhGielHg

These are the engines the R34s came out with in 1998

2 DOOR:

Engine Model - - Power output

4WD :

RB25DE25GT FOURENR34-5MT/E-ATx--200PS/6000rpm

26.0kg-m/4000rpm

2WD :

RB25DET--25GT TURBO ER34 5MT/M-ATx 280ps/6400rpm 35.0kg- m/3200rpm

RB25DE 25GT ER34 5MT/M-ATx 200ps/6000rpm 26.0kg-

m/4000rpm

RB20DE GT HR34 5MT/E-ATx 155ps/6400rpm 19.0kg- m/4400rpm

4 DOOR

4WD :

RB25DE 25GT-X FOUR ENR34 E-ATx 200ps/6000rpm 26.0kg- m/4000rpm

RB25DE 25GT FOUR ENR34 5MT/E-ATx 200ps/6000rpm 26.0kg- m/4000rpm

2WD :

RB25DET 25GT-X TURBO ER34 5MT/M-ATx 280ps/6400rpm 35.0kg- m/3200rpm

RB25DET 25GT TURBO ER34 5MT/M-ATx 280ps/6400rpm 35.0kg-

m/3200rpm

RB25DE 25GT-X ER34 E-ATx 200ps/6000rpm 26.0kg- m/4000rpm

RB25DE 25GT ER34 E-ATx 200ps/6000rpm 26.0kg- m/4000rpm

RB20DE GT HR34 5MT/E-ATx 155ps/6400rpm 19.0kg-

m/4400rpm

so are they low or high impendence?

would GTR ones fit?

They're the opposite of the GTR ones but I can't remember which they are (I think it's high)

the only upgrade I could find (from any maker) was the Nismo 480cc ones, but if you alter the resistor pack then you could fit GTR ones I suppose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...