Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My figures are based on injector flow at that power for correct air fuel ratio, with zero fuel returned to the tank absolutely flat out.

This might not be a good idea, but it is the theoretical absolute maximum limit for the whole fuel system and pump.

A fuel pump supplier might not feel entirely comfortable with this though, and specify the pump at a power level that allows 10% fuel return or some safe margin as a design centre figure. These days they could get sued and be liable, if a particular pump falls a wee bit short of any published specification.

So there is going to be a gap between a safe design figure, and absolute possible maximum.

Hi Zombie, did you read this on the Bosch web site................

"Bosch Fuel Pumps have their flow rates defined in N-Heptane as part of their engineering specification. N-Heptane is a pure chemical and does not have the same viscosity and density as standard petrol. Hence the N-Heptane flow rate figures stated should be used as a general guide for comparison purposes only."

and

"Operating voltage = 12v, test pressures indicated are also suggested maximum operating pressures."

So to use the 044 as an example:

^ at zero pressure using 13.8 volts, it flows 330 litre of Premium unleaded petrol, as per the table.

^ at 5 bar (73.5 PSI) of resistance using 12 volts, it flows 200 litres of N-Heptane as per the Bosch reference.

The reason why I quote 330 litres is, that is what they flow when you test them in the car with no resistance. Warpspeed’s method, although ultimately more accurate for assessing the flow of the whole system, is a bit tricky to use at the race track. So if I have a suspect pump, I can check it by quickly disconnecting the hose at the tank and checking the flow. It has been my experience that when a pump fails (or is failing) it shows up in the free flow test just as well as it does in a resistance (pressure test).

It is worth noting that the hoses from the pump have enough resistance (although quite small) for the pump to work against. In some applications with really large fuel hoses this may not be the case.

Plus as Warpspeed says, there is a difference between the rated flow of the pump and what they actually can do. The manufacturers are conservative by as much as 5% in my experience.

Hope that answers your question.

Hey I just realised, doesnt the skyline have a variable voltage fuel pump? So at idle, the pump wont be running at full bore, so that Warpspeed technique wouldnt be accurate would it? I know for a fact my 200SX doesnt, but yeah...

Hi Busky2K, I wouldn't run an 044 using the standard wiring, it won't handle the current drain. We use the standard wire as the switch on a relay and run a separate power supply from the battery that is capable of handling the 044 current requirements.

This is always a very good thing to do with any major pump upgrade.

Power for the stock pump will come via the ignition switch, and at least one relay, and other assorted crap. These circuits have other loads as well as just the pump, so the voltage drop at the back of the car might be a lot more than you expect.

Rewiring the whole lot is not a practical option. Sydneykid has the right idea (as always !). Use the original pump power wire to energise a pump power relay located at the back near the pump. Then run a really big fat cable right back to the main fuse-box.

The variable pump speed feature will then not work, and you might end up with a noisy pump, but perhaps not if you take special care in mounting it.

But even if you do nothing else, check the voltage right at the pump, it makes a vast difference to pump performance.

Another thing you can do that might not appeal to everyone, is to fit a second pump in series with the stock pump, and leave the stock pump as it is. The second pump relieves the in tank pump of just about all back-pressure, and it will then flow far more, getting twice the flow this way is not unexpected.

The second pump can be in the engine compartment, and hang by its rubber hoses, so there will be no extra noise. Also there are more volts at this end of the car if you use a pump relay as described above. You can even see and get to the damned thing as well.

I am not suggesting this is any better, just different. It certainly works, is easier to do, and it is something else to think about.

Im also chasing 200rwKw and right now I have my eyes on a Bosch910 pump

I read on previous threads that these arent recommended to be mounted in-tank

What kind of problems would I have if I tried to mount it using the standard brackets?

i.e. replace the standard in-tank pump completely

Has anyone mounted a 910 before? What's the average price on 910s nowadays anyway?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, just after some guidance with an R34 sunroof that has stopped working correctly. It still opens and closes perfectly fine, but it no longer tilts/vents up or down. As a result, the rear of the glass now sags a bit as it drops down slightly in order to retract into the roof, but now it can't pop upwards into a flush position. I’ve probed the pins on the back of the switch connector with a multimeter and it seems like both switches (for open/close and tilt/vent) still work correctly. Any ideas on what it could be, or where I should even start in terms of diagnosing? I'm sure someone's had this issue before but I haven't been able to find anything online relating to this specific issue, most of the issues are with the seals leaking or the motor failing entirely. Thanks in advance!
    • Do you have some data like fuel pressure? It's really hard to say if you're still fighting a fuel system issue at this point. Could be something weird like the FPCM dipping out.
    • Yeah in that case, pulling the dent out. Event a very slight dent can create a lot of work filler-wise and there is a strong chance the panel won't be the factory shape when you are done (as the dent will result in a new high point created somewhere, then everything is brought up to that new high point... but the panel shouldn't be that high if that makes sense).  So you've filled and primed the panel and it is flat, why would you go back and remove the primer and add more filler? 
    • Something else I have been faffing with while the car was off the road is making the AC work. Assuming the car isn't at a thermal limit the idea of having AC while waiting in line to go on track sounds delightful. I have actually been lugging around the weight of the entire system since 2018 when the RB25NEO went in without it working at all.  The main reason was in the first few events before I got around to re-gassing it the rubber hose that runs under the manifold had the factory heat wrap/sleeve fail resulting in this: ~2 years ago I purchased a complete used R32 AC line set but when I finally went to install it the line i needed was different where the expansion section is I found a local place that was able to replace the rubber section and re-crimp. They also added some modern heat sleeve to the hose Tight fit but fingers crossed this is the last physical piece of the puzzle needed
    • the top black section is bonded to the silver section with some form of rubber. I assume to isolated NVH from the box
×
×
  • Create New...