Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry to asked this question here but most s2k rev heads have not stroked the f20c engine to this capacity yet or use Greddy turbo.

I figured that you guys would be the best people to ask, since you would have a lot more experience with the Greddy turbo on the RB25.

Anyway, I've been tinkering with both RB and F20C for a while now. Both engines fascinate me :D

So don't tease me with this ricer engine okie lol

The T67 on my built 2L s2k made 312 kw at 18psi.

The engine has been stroked to 2.47L and still has the T67 turbo.

We spent a bit of time on the dyno yesterday. Will do a bit more at a later stage to get more midrange.

The setup would not produce any more power after 15psi or above 7.5krpm despite what we tried.

Currently, on pump 98 fuel, it makes

-7psi of boost at 3krpm

-200rwkw at 4-4.5krpm

-peak torque @ ~5.7krpm

-320rwkw at 7.5krpm

My tuner told me that the turbo is out of puff and I know that he is correct (but was giving him a hard time when he suggested switch to ball bearing turbo lol)

Has anyone got any dyno result of T67 turbo on a RB25?

When does the T67 runs out of puff and at what power?

I am looking for a bit more midrange and may be a bit more top end.

In your experience, is there any turbo out there that can give me both?

Car is used for street and tight circuit.

Thanks

Dude... you've got all the cool toys!!!

How the hell are you getting 300kw to the ground??? I've been in a few lightly boosted ( one was wide body ) S2K's in Florida... Whith reasonable tread, it was just wheel spin city!!! Ha ha ha love it.

Speaking of ball bearings, billet turbochargers can re-core you T67 with they're "special" ball bearing core... a TD turbo was around 1300bucks, so I imagine a T67 would be similar.

Cheers

Justin

Sorry to asked this question here but most s2k rev heads have not stroked the f20c engine to this capacity yet or use Greddy turbo.

I figured that you guys would be the best people to ask, since you would have a lot more experience with the Greddy turbo on the RB25.

Anyway, I've been tinkering with both RB and F20C for a while now. Both engines fascinate me :D

So don't tease me with this ricer engine okie lol

The T67 on my built 2L s2k made 312 kw at 18psi.

The engine has been stroked to 2.47L and still has the T67 turbo.

We spent a bit of time on the dyno yesterday. Will do a bit more at a later stage to get more midrange.

The setup would not produce any more power after 15psi or above 7.5krpm despite what we tried.

Currently, on pump 98 fuel, it makes

-7psi of boost at 3krpm

-200rwkw at 4-4.5krpm

-peak torque @ ~5.7krpm

-320rwkw at 7.5krpm

My tuner told me that the turbo is out of puff and I know that he is correct (but was giving him a hard time when he suggested switch to ball bearing turbo lol)

Has anyone got any dyno result of T67 turbo on a RB25?

When does the T67 runs out of puff and at what power?

I am looking for a bit more midrange and may be a bit more top end.

In your experience, is there any turbo out there that can give me both?

Car is used for street and tight circuit.

Thanks

I would not personally use a billit turbo as I am suspect on there longevity. I do believe myself that there is a reason none of the worlds largest turbo manufactures go down this route and they do spend millions in R&D so there has to be a reason for it !!. I personally fail to see that the manufacturers of these turbos wich work out of a small shed in their back yard with an extremely limited budget to conduct any R&D know something that some of the worlds leading turbo manufacturers do not. I would suspect myself that the thermal loading that the core is subject to would no doubt cause the alluminium biilit to become brittle and fatauge long before the cast iron cores used for every other turbo charger and by every other manufaturer in the world.

what rear you using? i reckon looking at your power its an 8, the 10cm has bugger all more lag on the rb25 yet supports another 30-40rwkw easy.

It's a 10 but I did not double check when I got it back from the turbo rebuilder.

I will double check today. The tune was very conservative with, from memory, about 14 degree top end

If it's a 10, what is my next option Trent?

How the hell are you getting 300kw to the ground??? I've been in a few lightly boosted ( one was wide body ) S2K's in Florida... Whith reasonable tread, it was just wheel spin city!!! Ha ha ha love it.

Speaking of ball bearings, billet turbochargers can re-core you T67 with they're "special" ball bearing core... a TD turbo was around 1300bucks, so I imagine a T67 would be similar.

I think that's the benefit of these Greddy turbo where the boost ramp rate is early enough but not as rapid.

No problem with traction in 3rd with the RB25 gearbox ratio on the 245 treads used for dyno. First and second is not too bad until ~6krpm.

Yes I can understand traction problem with the shorter gear ratio in oem box, non mechanical diff, and garret turbo.

Yes I recall Buschur had some good success with recoring the ?TD06 but don't they also change the compressor wheel on these turbo.

Do you have any proven results with just recoring the turbo?

Thanks Dazmo.

Edited by 9krpm

Def not worth re-coring the turbo IMO. The wheels and housings make all the difference. If ball bearings made that much difference, Trust would've changed to ball bearings years ago.

Thought about something like a Garrett GT3582R?

I had a chance to look at the tune and talked to the tuner this morning.

Engine is basically sucking the turbo out of it's efficiency by around 7500rpm.

Extra timing and boost (on the controller) were given but we did not see anything more than 15-16psi.

Midrange timing is extremely conservative so, there MAY be a bit more top end power gain once this get tuned.

Yes the GT35R or GT37R will be nice for this setup but it will involves a lot of fabrication work and 400rwkw will not be usable on the street for this car.

How much laggier is the TD07 compare to the T67?

Not an RB25 and not a T67, but on an RB26 Brockas switched from twin 2835's to a single GT35 and picked up substantially more mid with a tad more power earlier.

From memory he used a GT35 with a T4 turbine housing which he got through GCG turbo's. He posted up a thread here in SAU not so long ago.....here's a link to the dyno on Antilag....scroll down to his dyno nearly half way down the page - he was making 165rwhp at 4000, 275rwhp at 4500 and 557rwhp at 6500. Also search on SAU for his thread for more info. Notice how the torque peaks at 5000 and holds fairly flat to 7500 which is the sign of a good turbo match.

http://antilag.com/forums/showthread.php?t=749&page=54

Edited by juggernaut1

9krpm, i have a TD06SH-25G at home that i am waiting to try on my car. I mainly grabbed it for the exhaust housing size which i am 50:50 about being able to be switche over to my TD06-20G turbo. I know the T67 housings can be swapped with my TD06-20G, but not sure about the TD06SH-25G.

Because, i thought the T67 ran the same exhaust wheel as the TD06SH, but according to that graph of yours Dane thats not the case, which means i dont think i can swap the 10cm housing for the 8cm housing between the TD06S-20G and TD06SH-25G :D;)

But point is, its on the shelf and whilst not for sale, provided you are nice and careful when installing with regards to priming with oil etc i dont mind if you try it to see if the power it to your liking before you run off and buy one

It's a 10 but I did not double check when I got it back from the turbo rebuilder.

I will double check today. The tune was very conservative with, from memory, about 14 degree top end

If it's a 10, what is my next option Trent?

TD06SH-25g 10cm will do the trick, bolt on too :whistling:.

I just finished a R34 with a td06-25g (not the SH) 10cm which was nearly the same as the 8cm T67 in power and response, which was quite interesting (peak @4000rpm). In cars ive seen here the TD06SH-25g 10cm has a lot more top end at least 30-40rwkw than the T67 8cm.

If budget and fab was'nt an issue i would say the K5-660 or k5-700r, we just finished tuning the race car with the K5-660R and it is quite something... we did back to backs with a GT35R and it was more responsivee than the GT35R (20 pound by 4200) and still makes 400rwkw @ 20psi.

Edited by URAS
Not an RB25 and not a T67, but on an RB26 Brockas switched from twin 2835's to a single GT35 and picked up substantially more mid with a tad more power earlier.

From memory he used a GT35 with a T4 turbine housing which he got through GCG turbo's. He posted up a thread here in SAU not so long ago.....here's a link to the dyno on Antilag....scroll down to his dyno nearly half way down the page - he was making 165rwhp at 4000, 275rwhp at 4500 and 557rwhp at 6500. Also search on SAU for his thread for more info. Notice how the torque peaks at 5000 and holds fairly flat to 7500 which is the sign of a good turbo match.

http://antilag.com/forums/showthread.php?t=749&page=54

No offence intended but those power figures quoted would make me think that that would be a pretty terrible combo to drive to go from 165rwhp @4000 to 557rwhp @ 6500 to me it would just suggest that it would be fairly difficult to put the power to the ground and unless he is useing mega revs would end up with a fairly narrow power band.

I personally just dont understand why people would go for this sort of combo especcially when the peak power output quoted would be achieved with ease with a pair of low mounts and would be making at least 100 - 150 rwhp more at 4k and the same sort of top end power figure and that would without a shadow of a doubt be a much quicker car and a much nicer combo to drive than the above combo based on the figures quoted. just my 2c .

TD06SH-25g 10cm will do the trick, bolt on too :P.

I just finished a R34 with a td06-25g (not the SH) 10cm which was nearly the same as the 8cm T67 in power and response, which was quite interesting (peak @4000rpm). In cars ive seen here the TD06SH-25g 10cm has a lot more top end at least 30-40rwkw than the T67 8cm.

If budget and fab was'nt an issue i would say the K5-660 or k5-700r, we just finished tuning the race car with the K5-660R and it is quite something... we did back to backs with a GT35R and it was more responsivee than the GT35R (20 pound by 4200) and still makes 400rwkw @ 20psi.

Thanks for recommending the K5 turbo but I think I will save that money to make the gtr faster :(

I think I will look at the TD06SH -25G 10cm since I am pretty sure that my T67 is 25G 10cm.

Thanks for all of your kind helps guys.

Drag racing is over for this little pocket rocket, so I am not going to try shoot big top end number.

I will get the car retune in a month time with this the current and see what we can get in the low to mid rev.

If it's "too" responsive then I may try the TD06SH. I will definitely report back here for the difference between the 2 turbo if I do test the td06sh.

BTW this is what a GT37R does on a 2.2L on pump fuel + meth/water injection in the US

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lCjOgoyEM&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lCjOgoyEM&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lCjOgoyEM&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I read that he has ~685whp (equivalent to around 450rwkw on the OZ dyno)

Thanks again :)

Edited by 9krpm

BW S200 dyno vs T67....perhaps the Borg Warner may give you the mid range your chasing.

s200_turbocharger_dyno_1.jpg

and source:

http://www.turbo-kits.com/s200_turbochargers.html

Edited by juggernaut1

Sorry the imbedded link did not work;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lCjOgoyEM&hl=en&fs=1&

Juggernat, I think the T67 they referred to is a Garrett T67, which I have no idea how it fair up to the Greddy T67.

I have not play with Borg Warner turbo but a turbo s2k in NSW has been using these Borg Warner turbos with some good success.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...