Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Finished off a couple other things. Made up some heat shielding for the new turbo as you cant use the stock heat shield. I used some ceramic cored aluminium sheet, its about 3mm thick and apparently good for around 800-900c. it was really easy to work with and form. it seems to be doing the trick, the cables and pipe work in the corner with the abs aren't getting as much heat soak anymore.

post-34711-1260773553_thumb.jpg

post-34711-1260773402_thumb.jpg

today i also got around to installing a new set of coilovers which i desperately needed. on my recent trip up to my brothers, 400km away, with 4 adults, luggage and not the best roads, i managed to blow out the rear left shock and the right hand side was starting to leak. i wasn't too fussed as i had some new ones to go in, and considering it was still the 10 year old stock suspension, i wasn't surprised.

i set the new coilovers to 50mm lower than the stock ones, which only gave me about a 25-30mm drop all round (i was expecting this), fronts are the same height left to right, but in the rear, the side with the fuel tank sits slightly lower than the other, i'll fix this up tomorrow. Give the springs a few days to settle then drop it down some more and off to get the alignment checked. i'll be getting some adjustable camber arms or bushes this week to allow me to drop it and still get a good setup.

post-34711-1260773637_thumb.jpg

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Looking good Josh! Will be interested to know what your dyno graph looks like when you've finished tuning. Roughly what horsepower is your GT35 capable of?

yeah i'm keeping my eyes out for a dyno day or any opportunity to get it on one to see how its going. i first tuned it to 14psi as i had a couple other things to sort out, just recently i've tuned it up to 20psi so i'm keen to see what power its making. the GT35 is rated 400-600 hp. i want to see it around 400hp to start with, then once i forge the engine, go for more.

Which exhaust housing do you have (using .63 on mine)?

i'm using the .82 internal gate housing.

yeah i'm keeping my eyes out for a dyno day or any opportunity to get it on one to see how its going. i first tuned it to 14psi as i had a couple other things to sort out, just recently i've tuned it up to 20psi so i'm keen to see what power its making. the GT35 is rated 400-600 hp. i want to see it around 400hp to start with, then once i forge the engine, go for more.

i'm using the .82 internal gate housing.

nice. but with running that amount of boost and 400hp, your'e really pushing the stock internals to the limit. i would also recommend a 1.8mm head gasket. ;)

Had I my time over again I'd have stuck with the stock pistons and gone for 500hp and waited until something broke, *then* rebuilt lol...

Josh what is the boost build like on a GT35? My GCG highflow is pretty much as responsive as stock but makes more power everywhere. I would like something that will make real power though...

nice. but with running that amount of boost and 400hp, your'e really pushing the stock internals to the limit. i would also recommend a 1.8mm head gasket. ;)

i've seen plenty of examples and personally know of a few engines running that sort of power on stock internals and they continue to do so safely. i've been running this setup for over a year now, and 20psi for a little over 6months and the engine still has good compression and runs nice and smooth. i know where your coming from when mentioning the thicker head gasket, but i'm not too bothered about it, 20psi is still be ok on the stock one and i'm not too keen on opening the engine before i'm ready to do a forged rebuild.

Had I my time over again I'd have stuck with the stock pistons and gone for 500hp and waited until something broke, *then* rebuilt lol...

Josh what is the boost build like on a GT35? My GCG highflow is pretty much as responsive as stock but makes more power everywhere. I would like something that will make real power though...

Dave the GT35 is a completely different power delivery, i imagine yours is a smooth increase in power, the GT35 hits hard, like doubling your power in a second lol. i get about 5-7psi from 2500-3000rpm, which i would compare to the same feeling as a stock turbo on 10psi. i get a slight increase in boost, maybe 5psi then as the revs increase until it hits hard at about 4000rpm. i have lifted my rev limit to make use of the later onset of power. it is a laggy turbo but that how i like it, not once has it annoyed me to the point where i wanted to replace it. it is a bit slow off the line but once power is on, with the auto, it will hold through the gears.

it depends on what type of power curve you like Dave, the GT30 is popular, a little less laggy and will still get you too 400hp, i probably would have gotten one if the GT35 and associated parts didn't come up so cheap (i got it off a friend). hi flows are good as they retain stock turbo response and give more up top, which is good for people who dont want to sacrifice a bit of low down for more up top.

i also wouldn't mind trying the .63 rear housing to see how that performs compared to the .82, but it all costs money and i cant justify shelling out $1000+ to try a different house that might not make that big of a difference anyway.

Edited by QWK32

Here is a quote from a workshop owner in Wellington:

A basic example of somthing we have tested at work.

RB30DET, usual standard mods, GT3582R. with a .63 on 14psi it made 300kw. with a .82 it made 330kw, though boost came on 500rpm later.

On 18psi the .63 made 350kw, where as the .82 made 375kw (could have made more but the power was more then enough for a street car)

The owner with the .82 exhuast housing, is looking to down size as the car isn't as responcive as he would like 4000rpm full boost.

That's on an RB30 but I guess the principle would be the same - changing to a .63 housing will bring boost on about 500rpm earlier and cost you 35kw at the top end.

I guess if you are used to how your car drives now there is no need to change but if you did want to change you could probably find some one with a .63 housing who wanted more top end and do a swap!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a diameter difference in the stock to Nismo? If so, the weight alone won't be indicative when comparing flywheels of the same diameter, since the radius of the flywheel acts on the moment of inertia with a square factor, where as mass is linear. Roughly going from a 4.5kg flywheel with radius 20cm, to a 9kg flywheel with radius 14cm would see them act the same. This calc is just here to act as a brief numbers comparison and reflects no actual RB flywheel diameters etc. it also assumes even weight distribution (thickness) throughout.
    • It seems this could be due to a restructure/team direction change... Or... You're working with a different category of vehicle... Or you've decided you'd rather be able to play with your own cars again...   I'm hoping the latter...
    • had 4 weeks off over xmas and well did some stuff to the shed and BRZ, well short of is I don't work full time in supercars anymore as of yesterday.........
    • Did you get any down time over Christmas, or have you had any since to play with this? Or have you given up and are trying to get yourself a second hand V8SC instead?
    • A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post". If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"... Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...   Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards. I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it". This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality. In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c) Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....   As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.    
×
×
  • Create New...