Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

Ive seen on the internet that the engine power ratings on the R34s with the Neo Straight six's are quiet impressive...

Ive seen 2L neos advertised but havnt read about them...

The 2.5L Non Turbo producing 200kW

2.5L Turbo producing 206kW (same as 2.6L Twin Turbo but less torque).

Ive read this on the internet a few times..

Just making sure its correct? And also what does the 2L engine produce seeing as some R34s have them (so ppl advertise)??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/
Share on other sites

I read it in errr... a site lol

How come the neo engines are so much more powerful??

Not that im complaining! :)

Read the N/A was 200kW but a fair bit less in torque...

206kW is the legal limit in Japan for stock engines im guessin right..?

Because all major engines STOCK from diff makes etc 206kW.

I cant wait to get an R34!!! Be waitin for a few years tho... :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-599882
Share on other sites

The neos are also in the Nissan Laurel.

Well the rb25det Neo has different ignition timing ( more advanced VVT system). I guess thats how it got some of its extra power.

All the Neo Motors use whats called a Lean-burn System. Hence ( low fuel consumption )

I found out that there is a 2L neo. It delivers maximum power of 155HP. which really isnt much. I suppose its pretty good for an NA 2L

It would have cost nissan alot more money getting 200kw out of a 2 litre.

Now you said that the 2.5L Neo "NON" turbo makes 200KW

Then you said the 2.5L Neo "TURBO" makes 206KW. What is the point of the turbocharged motor if they both make the same power??

Nissan could have kept the 2.5L an NA motor and still get GTR power.

Well really the 2.5 NA does not make 200KW, Its 200HP

the Neo RB25DET model makes 206KW (280HP)/6,400 RPM

34.0KG/3,200 RPM

CR = 9:0:1

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-599922
Share on other sites

The R34 25GT (NEO RB25DE) makes 200PS standard (around 200bhp), not sure KW's. which is slightly more than the RB25DE found in the earlier R32/R33. The engine also has higher torque outputs, and late model R34's have a slight improvement over earlier R34's. AFAIK, R34's were available with either Triptronic Auto boxes (+ / - gear change and steering wheel controls) or a 5sp manual.

On paper the R34 GTT (RB25DET) and the R34 GTR (RB26DETT) put out the same power (280ps), but of course, that's "on paper"...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-599980
Share on other sites

>jazza08: Looks like your confusing yourself there dude! :)

Just relax, one question at a time, and "All will be rrrrrrrrrrrrrevealed"... (Thumbwars)

Thanks Dave for that "Gem" :) about the Neo-6 power outputs... seriously, how many mouse clicks did it take to get some official figures? 4? 5?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-599985
Share on other sites

Rezz - about 3 or 4!! :):):(

As an aside, most of the people I know of, who drive an R34 with the triptronic box say that don't usually bother with the steering controls...

I personally think Nissan did a very good job in upping the power figures for the R34 range, by tweaking the RB series engines, improving (or adding?) VVT to the NEO engines they managed to boost power/torque by a fair bit...

So that always raises the question - how come the R34 GTR doesn't get VVT and NEO technology?

Dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-600056
Share on other sites

i'm no expert, but i think that the GTRs actually have a stock output close to 300kw, probably a little less. The only reason that they say it has 206kw is to comply (ON PAPER) with the regulations. And i think that there are no more restrictions in japan for power output, need i say more about the next GTRs power??? again im no expert, so someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-600250
Share on other sites

If u even take the GT-T power output as correct, 206kw's, a stock dyno run (148rwkw) shows pretty much 30% power loss thru the drive train, that's 30% not 33%. If u translate this powerloss percentage to GTR's at about 190 - 195rwkw's, making them about 280kw's at the fly.

Now i'm not sure if transferring 70% of the engine power to the wheels is reasonable to assume, but if it is 206kw for the GT-T and 280kw for the GTR sound about right.

Oh and just in case u didn't realise, the GTR engine is 2.6 litres and has 2 turbos, instead of one :cheers: RB26DETT

Tiptronic can be done via the gear stick as well yeah? Or is just steering wheel mounted buttons?

And the "206kw" limit was a "gentlemans agreement" in Japan between the different car manufacturers. But if u look at some of the cars that have been produced, 22B STi's, GTR's, Twin Turbo Supras, etc, they haven't been following it completely. But the agreement is no longer so yeah, time for the Japanese cars to mix it with the Euro boys in terms of power output.

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-601371
Share on other sites

You can change gears with a tiptronic on the steering wheel or with the gear stick. I have also heard that most people don't use the buttons on the wheel but I do all the time. I think it's because from the very first day I owned it I used them.

The only problem I have is that if you're booting it you have to press the button about 1000rpm before you want it to actually change gears because the revs climb so quickly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-601595
Share on other sites

NEO stands for New Environmental Optimisation or sumfin like that, all it duz is make the emissions from the engine better. The increase in power is from the upgraded ECU that accompanies the engine... don't believe the hype :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-601839
Share on other sites

Spot on FunkyMonkey - the NEO part of the R34 engines basically means they've tweaked it to produce fewer/cleaner emmisions. However, the R34 engines do benefit from ECU tweaks (and also manifold flow characteristics I've heard) that give it the extra power. Not forgetting improvements in the VVT side of things...

BTW, NEO = Nissan Ecology Orientated performance... :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-601987
Share on other sites

The gentleman's agreement is just that, an agreement - it's not legally binding. There is a hell of a lot more mutual agreement between companies in japan, as opposed to western nations. That's one of the reasons why you often find that pricing for similar products can be very similar between different companies (ie: intercoolers, etc).

The reason for the kW (or we should say, ps) limit is (apparently) to keep the companies on a level playing field and/or to stop any potential power 'wars'

If you look at the cars that exceed the kW agreement - they tend to not be directly from the big companies (HSV is to holden as Nismo is to nissan).

IIRC, the car with the most power over the advertised 280ps is the toyota supra (though the s8-9 FD rx7 probably has even more if you consider power:weight)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29277-skyline-r34/#findComment-602108
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
×
×
  • Create New...