Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a reflashed ECU on my RB25DET that is running a stock turbo at about 10psi quite well, but it will ping a little at more boost. If I put on an Apexi AX53B70 and run 10psi (hopefully a touch less) should it ping?

My thoughts are that it might reduce knock due to the larger exhaust housing and more efficient turbo at that flow boost level (allow increased timing). On the counter side is the fact that it is likely to make a chunk more torque so timing will need to be retarded.

Background:

Other mods are full exhaust, fuel pump, HDi intercooler, coil packs, EBC, big radiator, etc.

I currently have an AX53B70 (P25 housing). I was going to put on the Apexi turbo these holidays when I do a big service (timing belt, etc). Then depending upon how it drives was going to get an ECU and put in injectors early next year. I just don't want to put on the turbo and find it pings it's tits off and is virtually undrivable at any boost. (I think 10psi will be about the minimum adjustment for the wastegate/diaphragm)

Any input from tuners who have an idea about timing vs turbo size?

Edited by simpletool

Yeah, thanks, I know what you mean. And I will (in all likleyhood) be getting nistune after installing the turbo but....

1. But I will still be installing the turbo and driving around to check install is OK, and turbo is OK before driving 100km to get a tune.

2. The question was also to find a response to whether a larger turbo requires less timing or more timing for similar flow. Out of interest / theory.

  • 9 months later...

Just so you know, I ran on the Toshi remap with Apexi turbo for 3months perfectly. Car drove well, picked up some power, responsive with good fuel economy and even Brisbane - Sydney trip was great ~8l/100km.

got tuned, now have 305rwhp.

Just so you know, I ran on the Toshi remap with Apexi turbo for 3months perfectly. \

How do you know this exactly?

You were logging engine knock and so on i take it?

I mean just the fact you can't "hear" something, does not mean it isnt occuring or is safe.

Well OK, may I didn't mean "perfectly" but yeah I couldn't hear any knock - EVER. Plus monitored with SAFC2. I can't say the same about any other engine I have driven on for years - including, shitty corrolla, RB30, SR20 tuned (several times by "the best" tuners) and current tuned RB25. Plus it showed no signs of poor mixtures or erosion on the copper plugs (that lasted 20,000km). I can usually make an engine knock somehow and hear it - even when the so called expert engine tuners say it won't knock on the road. Yes, I know the RB25 doesn't like ping.

Edited by simpletool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...