Jump to content
SAU Community

Windows 7 - What Do You Guys Think Of It?


KR4-GTR
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not so with Windows 7. There is now no 4GB Ram limit in 32bit OS. So you can run as much as you like. Have a machine at work utilising 24GB of RAM on 32bit 7 OS.

But how does it do that though? My understanding of the 4gig cap was that it was a physical memory address limitation of 32bit OS...

Does 7 uses some kind of fancy coding tricks to get around this memory address limitation?

On topic: Had 7 RC installed for a couple of month now, no problems with it.

I was surprised that It managed to find all of the drivers for my ASUS laptop (minus the TV tuner & in modem drivers) using its auto update feature, so I didn't have to go search on the net myself for them.

Also just got Windows 7-tan Nanami Madobe theme installed from the Japanese win 7. I'm complete sold now. :blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry I was a bit quick to state it can use more than 4GB of ram. Windows limits it to 4GB but if you patch the kernel you can get it to read more. However, the 4GB limit has been lifted for Ready boost.

The 4GB limit of 32bit Windows is a bit archaic IMO. It is to do with driver support and the intel and AMD architechture. There are other 32bit OS that can handle more than 4GB happily unfortunately to get Windows to, you need to "play" with it a little.

Will update the running of the 512mb box once it's completely finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i thought that since vista service pack 1, 32 bit windows will now read that there is 4gb+ of ram or however much is installed, however - as per the limitations of a 32 bit operating system, it can only and will only use a percentage of the installed ram?

i remember reading that the feature was added due to people installing more than 4 gb and raising alot of questions as to why it was only reading as 3gb or 3.2gb - etc. so it now gives you a spill of how much is actually in there and thats it.

Edited by KR4-GTR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so pissed.

I installed Windows 7 ultimate (64 bit) on my laptop tonight.

The simplicity has disappeared. The small things (for one - the quick launch bar) are gone and ive got the CPU and RAM meters up and it still appears to be just as power hungry as vista, even a clean install (with no other programs) on idle is using 27% of my 4GB ram. Although you can work around some of these missing features and add them with a bit of code, would the standard user know how to do this?

The standard tasks i knew how to do before have now all changed - i.e. - organising my items in the start menu. I dont want to have to re learn shit - I can see the whole change of numerous processes and procedures pissing alot of people off. Its not 'better' its all just 'different', not user friendly.

The bug count is f**ked. Even Windows Live Messenger doesnt work properly - and its a microsoft program. It opens the program in 2 seperate windows you have to run it in compatibility mode for Vista to get it to work. You'd think it would be someones job to test this shit!

I know some initial teething issues are expected with the release of a new OS, but I was expecting a great operating system after microsofts last vista disappointment, and things are not looking bright.

Anyway, looks like im heading back into the vista waters tomorrow anyway as it wont even let me install my sound and modem drivers just because they are not digitally signed. Microsoft wont even let me choose which drivers i want to install now.. whats next? I bet in their next service pack they'll remove functionality to be able to type the word 'Apple' or any word starting with 'i' on a PC.

I've spent 3 hours trying to make this right and talking shit to myself saying its better than vista, but im only lying to myself. What a f**king failure of an operating system.

Just a rant at 2am.

What do you guys think of it?

I can see what the replies to this thread will be. So i'll say it now - no, im not going to get a mac!

Im just waiting for it to install now actually, be interesting to see what its like. And ive only just gotten used to Vista, dam technoloedgy changes over night!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

ya i never thought i'd be able to part with XP, but this 7 is very easy to use after a few hours of playing around with it, tasks can get done alittle faster mainly because multi[ple programs get organised easier, and ilove the preview thing when you roll tha mouse over the tabs at the bottom, shows you what windows are open, a big time saver, and makes eevrything feel more organised.

Only thing i can fault is i had an issue with trying to install Left 4 Dead (original game) on windows 7 64bit version and it couldnt be done, it wouldnt accept the disk, so i took it back to JB HI FI and got store credit on the game, then went to steam and got L4D2 for the same price as L4D in the shops here in OZ because of the USD conversion rate. thank you rising AUD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i thought that since vista service pack 1, 32 bit windows will now read that there is 4gb+ of ram or however much is installed, however - as per the limitations of a 32 bit operating system, it can only and will only use a percentage of the installed ram?

i remember reading that the feature was added due to people installing more than 4 gb and raising alot of questions as to why it was only reading as 3gb or 3.2gb - etc. so it now gives you a spill of how much is actually in there and thats it.

Limitation of consumer 32bit OS, you can hack Win7 32 to run over 3GB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im running windows 7 64 bit on 3 computers - have noticed that 2 of them are only running at 3GB ram, and the other is running at 3.5

weird stuff!?

so all the computers have onboard video cards? if not windows will reserve ram to use for video memory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so all the computers have onboard video cards? if not windows will reserve ram to use for video memory

hey my 2 desktops both have dedicated 512 mb ati graphics cards i have installed, and they both still read as only 3gb and 3.5gb of ram, instead of 4gb!

both of my laptops are both at 3gb aswell, should be 4gb - i know that a portion should be reserved for video - but 1gb!?

any advice would be appreciated :)

cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey my 2 desktops both have dedicated 512 mb ati graphics cards i have installed, and they both still read as only 3gb and 3.5gb of ram, instead of 4gb!

both of my laptops are both at 3gb aswell, should be 4gb - i know that a portion should be reserved for video - but 1gb!?

any advice would be appreciated :)

cheers!

i can only suggest you try updating the mobo;s bios

Try this, i havnt tried it so i dont know if it will work or not.

http://www.raymond.cc/blog/archives/2009/0...han-4gb-memory/

or, install 64bit, its better anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

64 bit windows 7 RC. havent had any issues whatsoever. even got my usb audio device working on it. and they're renowned for NOT working with vista or 7.

will upgrade to my free copy i got sent to me when i can be bothered formatting! :D 7 > Vista && XP.

will be upgrading at work soon.. the problem with 7 is that there is no built in support for developing in VB6. (i work on alot of legacy programs) so i will be using VMWare with a XP virtual HDD. should be fine :) only issue i had was that i liked coding with dual screens and i couldnt get a virtual PC to span. so u have to remote desktop to the virtual PC and then span the screens. yay :huh:

I really dislike being on Vista at work when i'm on 7 at home though!!! :|

thats my 5 cents / 2$ ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well got my pc workign again thanks to my pc guy

asked him what i can do to get it much faster with the hardware i got

windows 7 he said

then you can run a 64 bit system as opposed you your 32bit

and run 8gb of ram i said

yes he said

i bounded back home like a child with a lollypop

got the pc started up and said my respectfull goodbyes to XP

inserted disk, restarted, formatted, reinstalled 7

started first go super quick - just like vista but the mrs had vista on her laptop - so not so foreign to me

Update? yes please - clicky clicky - must restart

sure restart 7 you are so awesome

restart - background and no icons or taskbar - just blank screen

hmmm i'll leave you to think 7

come back 30 mins later and no go...

no more working 7....

reinstall

same as before but this time i sought ati drivers and catylist and loaded them on - beep

7 restarts in safemode

restart after

no icons...

uninstall 7 and reinstall after format

update? yes!

restart - no icons

the ONLY way to get it working again is to load on XP

^^^^ i did this for 2 days solid over a weekend and had enough

i'll try in a few months and hope one of the auto "updates" fixes this problem

so far i think 7 is shit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windows 7 thinks you're shit.

well you buy any product and have the expectation that it will work the first time.

sending windows 7 flowers to try to try and get on its good side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well you buy any product and have the expectation that it will work the first time.

sending windows 7 flowers to try to try and get on its good side

Beta - worked first time

RC - worked first time

Release - worked first time

Intel/AMD

nVidia/ATi

Didn't matter.

nerdcomputerrepair.jpg

That's obviously not me.

He's wearing underpants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...