Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

As the title says, I am looking to buy a 33GTR, I was under the impression that the series 3 has different headlights to the 1 and 2... sort of more like the series 2 of the gtst... is this the case? or am I loosing my mind.

Also what are the other differences between the series 1,2 and 3 on the R33 GTR?

Thanks for any help.

Off the top of my head..

S3 has Xeon headlights (some may have S1 headlights as some complaince places didnt replace them)

S3 has rear fog lights

S3 has a red stitched interior

ABS unit is different

Front bar has N1 slots and a different lip spoiler

Do a search im sure there is a lot more then this.

Cheers

Johno

  • 2 weeks later...

They are the main differences, and also the lower lip.

Heres a few pics of my series 3 that i took when i put it up for sale.

Hopefully this will help you tell the difference between the series 3 and the earlier R33 GTR's ;)

post-54322-1257333850_thumb.jpg post-54322-1257333886_thumb.jpg post-54322-1257333915_thumb.jpg

Edited by KR4-GTR
yeah, series 3 have one on the rear drivers side.

Its where the reverse light is on the S1/S2 R33's, its just slightly orange...and bright when you turn it on :laugh:

To me, its only the projectors that made series 3 standout from the earlier ones but you can always get aftermarket ones or even DIY like one guy who did it on SAU. To an untrained person like myself, its like looking at 34gtr and 34gtr vspec. The only thing you can tell are the diffusers, sticker and vspec fins on the diff.

To me, its only the projectors that made series 3 standout from the earlier ones but you can always get aftermarket ones or even DIY like one guy who did it on SAU. To an untrained person like myself, its like looking at 34gtr and 34gtr vspec. The only thing you can tell are the diffusers, sticker and vspec fins on the diff.

Are you referring to the Xenon headlights? The genuine ones do cost serious $$$ :thumbsup:

  • 4 months later...

hey. sorry to bring up a old topic.. i was wondering if the r33 gtr series has any shape difference in the bonnet through out the series.. just how series 1 and series 2 r33 gtst bonnets are different shape but also have a toller middle frame were it pops up more then the series 1.. thanx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...