Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking to buy a wagon for work duties and cannot decide between the AR-X and the 2004 Liberty 3.0R. Both are around the same price. I like the seats of the Liberty more and the Liberty does come in manual. The AR-X however looks better, and it has a turbo.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/293707-m35-or-subaru-liberty-30r/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if you like everything to work and also hassle free motoring - get the Liberty

if you don't mind tinkering a bit, and want a more exciting ride - get the Stag

lol....was just about to say the exact same thing.

those liberty are renound for leaking headgaskets though... and there pretty thirsty for a 4 cylinder..

:(

You are aware of the oil leak from the rear of the right bank on the VQ engines, yes?

2 consistent issues throughout all VQ25det powered M35's.

1. The turbo was a dealer replacement part at 100,000kms due to the fact that it is running more boost than the ceramic wheel can take.

2. Oil leak from the rear right bank, whilst minor, is a pain in the arse. This issue is also on the V35, Z33, and G35 as far as I know.

What are you work conditions? What are you expectations and wants from your car?

Maybe if we know more, we can give you a better opinion of which car to go for.

The 3.0l 6 in the Subaru isn't light on the fuel, but neither is the M35.

They both have complicated drivetrains which can be expensive.

I went with the M35 as it stands out from the crowd. Liberty wagons are like fleas on a dog.

I had a Suckeroo. 6 sets of rear wheel bearings, 3 coil packs, numerous plug leads , starter motor, oh, and a gearbox.

Worst vehicle I have ever owned, and that includes the HR Holden!

The other thing I noticed is the sooby is MUCH smaller in the cabin area to the extent that it was not much bigger than my missus Mazda 323 particularly rear legroom. The load area in a sooby wagon is about half the size of the m35 and nowhere near as wide.

:(

You are aware of the oil leak from the rear of the right bank on the VQ engines, yes?

2 consistent issues throughout all VQ25det powered M35's.

1. The turbo was a dealer replacement part at 100,000kms due to the fact that it is running more boost than the ceramic wheel can take.

2. Oil leak from the rear right bank, whilst minor, is a pain in the arse. This issue is also on the V35, Z33, and G35 as far as I know.

What are you work conditions? What are you expectations and wants from your car?

Maybe if we know more, we can give you a better opinion of which car to go for.

I'm looking for a wagon with lots of room and good performance. Maintenance issues doesn't concern me since I am a mechanic. Are spare parts for the Stag freely available? I heard somewhere that the transmission costs 15K or so to replace brand new from Nissan.

I'm leaning more towards the Stag at the moment since it is more unique where as the Scoob is a dime a dozen.

How does the Scoobs power and handling is compared with the Stag? I haven't driven the Scoob or the Stag yet so I don't know, but I've driven the 350 GT-8. Is the Scoob similar to the 350GT-8?

I have had a few Subbies over the last 12 years,

* Liberty GX

* Forrester (had it for 10 years and 204km)

* Liberty RX sedan (only kept it for 1 year)

* Outback 04 (wife has it now with 125km) 2.5L manual

So I love my Subbies and they go very well and are very reliable.

BUT

I have had my M35 ARX for 2 years and 60K driven and I love it. I get back into the Outback and it is nice to drive but it has nothing compared to the Stagea past 3500rpm and the handling is very soft and certainly quieter than my slightly improved car.

I am not a mechanic and I do most of the servicing on my car myself and it is so easy. Parts are easy to get, at the worst case it is 2 weeks from Japan for odd parts from Nissan.

The good thing now is that there are few more on the road and lots of information so some parts are easier to get and there is so much knowledge about that most problems are reasonably easily solved.

The ARX at a minimum needs some improvement in the suspension as it gets on as it can become quite soft. Sway bars made a huge difference and new shocks and springs just finished off the job.

2 years later and I have absolutely no regrets.

Cheers

Andy

I'm looking for a wagon with lots of room and good performance. Maintenance issues doesn't concern me since I am a mechanic. Are spare parts for the Stag freely available? I heard somewhere that the transmission costs 15K or so to replace brand new from Nissan.

I'm leaning more towards the Stag at the moment since it is more unique where as the Scoob is a dime a dozen.

How does the Scoobs power and handling is compared with the Stag? I haven't driven the Scoob or the Stag yet so I don't know, but I've driven the 350 GT-8. Is the Scoob similar to the 350GT-8?

If you want room and performance, then there is no contest. Go with the M35.

I think you are confusing the GT-8's CVT8 transmission with the M35's 5 speed.

The NM35's that can currently be complied in Australia only use a 5 speed auto. Easy to service and not expensive to replace if need be.

I would recommend that you drive both (obviously) and compare them directly.

You cannot compare the Subie with the 2-door, 8-speed, RWD V35. Completely different cars.

Also, which is the better Stag; the 250T RS four, the AR-X, or the Axis?

Well, as standard the ARX has the most equipment, but you can get all of it in the other models too... except the poxy 180mm ride height

Edited by iamhe77
Also, which is the better Stag; the 250T RS four, the AR-X, or the Axis?

All depends what you need and value.

ARX has a bit more clearance (but mine is now the height of a 250T), 18" wheels, LSD, Super HICAS and nice leather interior plus the track is 10mm wider.

AXIS is much the same but better suspension, slightly lower, NO LSD, NO Super HICAS but better quality leather interior.

250T RS can also be leather, lower suspension, 17 inch wheels.

My pick is between ARX and AXIS. Wish I got the sunroof.

The gearbox problem is to do with the V35 GT8 which has the CVT 8 speed gear box.

Cheers

Andy

RS is the base ('Sports') model - which has 3 DIN guages in the centre console, usually cloth seats and is the cheapest of the range. (Still a very nice car - I have this model).

RX is the luxury model - including a popup screen, optional leather interior (can possibly get leather in the RS too but i've found it to be more common in the RX), electric front seats, and a few other differences, only slightly more expensive than the RS (difference at auction was around 1-2K when I was looking).

AR-X is the one with the raised height (ie. All Terrain) and flares etc and also has more options than the RX.

AXIS is the Autech model, with bodykit, different grill, heated front seats, and many other extras. This is the most expensive in the range...

someone else may be able to fill you in with more details...

On the topic of which one...I would go the stag purely for the extra space, if not the turbo (although you can get a liberty with a turbo too i think). The boot shape of the subie's cuts out so much boot space you really aren't getting much more than a sedan. Depends on which way you look at it. The subie has full support for parts, insurance, any mechanic can work on it (but who'd let them?) etc.

The M35 has some parts available here (most if not all of your regular maintenance items are available) but if all else fails you can order stuff from japan through any nissan dealer (1-2 weeks delivery).

If you're talking a liberty of equivalent year to the M35, then the stagea is a much nicer car - no question. However the newer libertys might be more even, but then the price goes in favour of the stag...

How many other luxury performance wagons with low kms can you get for under $20K?

RS is the base ('Sports') model - which has 3 DIN guages in the centre console, usually cloth seats and is the cheapest of the range. (Still a very nice car - I have this model).

RX is the luxury model - including a popup screen, optional leather interior (can possibly get leather in the RS too but i've found it to be more common in the RX), electric front seats, and a few other differences, only slightly more expensive than the RS (difference at auction was around 1-2K when I was looking).

AR-X is the one with the raised height (ie. All Terrain) and flares etc and also has more options than the RX.

AXIS is the Autech model, with bodykit, different grill, heated front seats, and many other extras. This is the most expensive in the range...

someone else may be able to fill you in with more details...

On the topic of which one...I would go the stag purely for the extra space, if not the turbo (although you can get a liberty with a turbo too i think). The boot shape of the subie's cuts out so much boot space you really aren't getting much more than a sedan. Depends on which way you look at it. The subie has full support for parts, insurance, any mechanic can work on it (but who'd let them?) etc.

The M35 has some parts available here (most if not all of your regular maintenance items are available) but if all else fails you can order stuff from japan through any nissan dealer (1-2 weeks delivery).

If you're talking a liberty of equivalent year to the M35, then the stagea is a much nicer car - no question. However the newer libertys might be more even, but then the price goes in favour of the stag...

How many other luxury performance wagons with low kms can you get for under $20K?

there's a couple more out there...but yeah not too many.

How does the automatic feel on the Stag and how is the boost response? Does the turbo kick in suddenly or is it linear like the RB25DET?

Does the AR-X have full time AWD or does it use the ATTESA-ETS?

Do Stags have dual zone climate control aircon?

I have to agree that the Stag has way more space than the Liberty. The boot alone is enormous. I had a look at one at the dealer the other day and the thought of putting in 2 subs with a few amps in the boot and still have plenty of room is almost a deal maker for me already.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 😅
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 🫠    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
×
×
  • Create New...