Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am going to pick my car up from the tuners this weekend. He says mechanically it came up a treat, but he doesn't like my 4.9:1 ratio R180 LSD at all, on the grounds that the car wants to spend all its time up at a really high rev range, and so it isn't making the most out of it's torque. I don't like the idea of losing acceleration, but he says the diff isn't making the most of the engine's potential anyway.

He's pushing me to convert a 3.9:1 diff to LSD, arguing that his Datsun 1600 ran out of legs on the Phillip Island straight using a 4.4 ratio. His diff builder does the conversion surprisingly cheaply.

The car is a Skyline C210 sedan, with L28, triples, (making maybe 150hp?) marginally lighter than the 1210kg standard. It has a SR20det 5 speed, with the following ratios (I think):

1st: 3.321

2nd: 1.902

3rd: 1.308

4th: 1.000

5th: 0.759

I would like it to remain a quick streeter, that can do the occasional track day with the NDSOC club without being totally put to shame.

Any ideas? 3.9, 4.1, 4.4, leave it alone...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/294114-which-diff-for-l28-skyline/
Share on other sites

4.9???

That sounds like a NISMO ratio or the front diff from a 720 4x4 (or were they 5.1's??)

L28 with triples - go for a 3.9 or maybe a 4.1 (3.7 would probably be a bit too tall - 3.54 was too tall for my old L28ET MR30, but man it had some legs!)

I'd expect that a 3.9 would be the standard ratio for the C210 anyway (it was on the MR30)

4.9 is more like the sort of ratio for a rally car - rapid acceleration out of corners, keep the engine up near peak torque.

I reckon something like the 4.1 ('74-on 180B SSS had this ratio) would be a good compromise between acceleration and top speed.

Yeah, go for the 3.9. You've got the same set up as me, and my 3.9 is spot on I reckon. I agree with blind elk, that being a rally diff. You'd have no problem selling it on Bridibella ( rall site). I dynoed my l28 the other day, made 142@ the wheels. The tune was average apparantley,running way to rich. I have 72 grind coming from POWER PLAY which should be in in a week, current grind 68. Then I'm getting it tuned on a dyno, rather than by ear.

4.9 is more like the sort of ratio for a rally car - rapid acceleration out of corners, keep the engine up near peak torque.

I reckon something like the 4.1 ('74-on 180B SSS had this ratio) would be a good compromise between acceleration and top speed.

Except the 180B used an R160...

Well for what it's worth, I'm using a 4.11 in the DR30 with same gear ratios for the likes of Wakefield & Winton, but Eastern Creek I'm going to 3.7 and for the PNV with it's L28et and bags of torque I'm going to use a 3.9 R200 LSD with gear ratios of 1. 3.592, 2. 2.246, 3. 1.415, 4. 1.000, 5. 0.813:1

My theory is on cruise in 5th I will get better driveability with the 3.9/0.813 instead of 4.11/0.833

Cheers, D

say if ya wanted to change the ratios in a r180 from 3.9 to say around 4.11. is there a easy swap from another diff or what else used the r180 in those ratios? just swappin the crown and pinion gear. easy to do it on the r31s bw78's. pinni was 4.11 and skylines were 3.7 and 3.9. then vls were 3.45 i think... wondering if something similar with the r30s etc

cheers..

The SR20 box came with a smashed rally car that I bought complete a couple of years back. I swapped the box, diff, L26 and twin carbs, suspension, wheels and tyres into my fairly stock sedan, and all for the bargain price of $4000... most of which has long since been broken or upgraded anyway.

From memory, the box was a standard C210 five speed, split, with the guts of a second hand SR20 box crammed inside. Apparently the Sr20 internals fitted in "like lego."

'Cause the bell housing is still L-series, the tailshaft and cross-member remain stock C210 items. From memory my gear lever is Datsun, but a slightly different shape to the C210 stick (it's 260Z or something random - a slight L shape rather than straight). Even the gear knob is stock C210.

Ill provide more details ASAP, my receipt file is with the car at the tuners.

My vote is 4.1 :happy:

SR20 box swap involves pulling the sr20 or ca18 bellhousing off the box, getting a L series bellhousing.

1 selector shaft hole in the L series bell needs to be drilled out larger.

You need to pull one of the bearings off the sr20/ca18 box and replace it with the one from a L series box as the L series bearing is slightly smaller in diameter (replace bearing while your there)

Minor metal needs to be taken out off the L series bell due to one of the gears JUST touching it.

For more info, theres a tutorial on ozdat.

I did the swap before the tutorial was made, easy as :)

I am going to experiment with a couple of diffs this weekend. If it feels good, Ill send it off to get the LSD conversion.

However, I cant find a page which mentions which ratio came standard with which car!

Skyline C210 3.9:1?

Datsun 240k 4.1:1?

Mr30 ???

Has anyone committed this stuff to memory?

Also found the receipt for the gearbox conversion. $1300 from Mammi Motors in Vic, including brass button clutch, flywheel machining, swapping the internals over. The Sr20 box was supplied by the previous owner.

So is the R30.

But you won't find many IRS S12's around in Aus.

Your best bet for non-CV is 240/260Z automatic - 3.9:1

I wonder if you can fit R30 axles to C210 arms? I would be very surprised if there was no compatibility there. Changing the arms would probably be easiest, if feasible.

Cheers Ricky, that's a really nice offer. I'll see if I can't first find something a bit closer though - we both know that Vic-WA freight stings a bit! On the topic I've got some seat covers for you... If you're interested PM me your details again and we can ship them over.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 馃槀) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
  • Create New...