Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The guy that tuned my car (an old-school Datsun rally driver) convinced me that my car was a menace to drive on account of it being too low in the back and having terrible bump-steer every time the rear end bottomed out.

He told me that he had some "suitable" springs, and supplied and fit them for next to nothing.

I concede that the car does handle much better now... but the height in the rear is back up to standard, and the car looks kind of odd with it's butt sticking up in the air (although apparently the view of my spinning tailshaft when you drive behind me is kind of cool).

Previously the car was on Pedders red "low" springs - so they are out.

My old rally wreck was on yellow King springs which I sold off cheap before I ever tried driving on due to their diabolical reputation, although they did look to be somewhere between high and far too low in terms of ride height. Also I have heard that cutting a springs to lower the ride height is a really stupid idea because it affects the handling of the car (but I won't even pretend that I understand the physics of why that is).

There are springs available from other Datsuns e.g. 240K that will physically fit my car - but the K is slightly lighter than the C210... is this a big issue?

Anyone got any ideas or recommendations?

It's nice to be finally making improvements to my car rather than just repairing the broken bits for once!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/294599-c210-ride-height/
Share on other sites

The main problem in lowering a Datsun/Nissan with the A-arm rear suspension is that you start to toe-out the rear end. Lowering lowers the centre of gravity of the car (good thing, generally), but also affects the roll centre (probably a good thing).

The K springs are probably a softer spring, which is probably advantageous to get the arse to squat under acceleration. From experience, super heavy rear springs prevent the rear end putting power to the ground, especially in the wet.

Cutting springs is not a problem, as long as the spring can remain captive at full droop. It gives a "stronger" spring as well.

Agreed; the adapter set up sounds unreal... did you buy it or make it?

I read some of the other posts re: s13 conversions, but missed some fairly vital info. Do I need to purchase the S13 coilover spring and shock as an assembly, or will the S13 spring fit over my existing C210 shock? Also is there a spring... tension/weight/setting??? (someone suggested 6kg for the rear) that I need to ask for?

Gordie, if your car is handling well, I'll try and copy what you have done to the letter.

Good to see things are going well with the Datto for you man,

The coilovers should come as a complete set, with the spring on an adjustable perch. Most should come with adjustable shocks too I would think?.

6kg springs should be ok, don't go much harder if you like your spine the way it is.

If you can get some spec's up for those adaptors I might be able to knock some up at work, measurements would have to be spot on tho. Thinking about doing the same with mine.

i bought the adaptors off a guy who had them in his hr31.

but any machine place you be able to knock some up easy as.

just went and took some pics of what i'll be using.

There are the adaptors

05112009897.jpg

05112009898.jpg

05112009899.jpg

c210 v's s13 coilovers.

05112009900.jpg

05112009901.jpg

and the adaptors on the s13 coilovers

05112009902.jpg

this is the ride hight with the stock springs

101_0088.jpg

(this is when i first got the white car a few years ago)

c210 has 3 bolts on top at the rear. s13 coilovers have 2. so you'll have to drill a hole up top to fit it. that old yellow parts car i sold to nick had this done.

you could just swap the top hats off the suspension?

just undo the 1-2 nuts in the middle and your good. and if you've removed stock springs from a shock before you would know u need spring compressors so the springs dont knock u out.

Edited by Dan_J
you could just swap the top hats off the suspension?

just undo the 1-2 nuts in the middle and your good. and if you've removed stock springs from a shock before you would know u need spring compressors so the springs dont knock u out.

yep, you can do it that way, but if you have some good quality coilovers you will lose the pillowball bearing set up, and possable the damper control knob.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...