Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi guys, I have an 2010 Infiniti FX35. I was searching on how to make my mirrors automatic and ran accross this thread.. The switch i have is the same as the R33 (open, neutral, close). I would like to try this mod out and was wondering, Tommy J, if you have any left. I would like to purchase one. I understand that its not guaranteed to work on my car and am willing to try it out.

Edited by Saleen00_227
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

I don't mean to sound rude. But don't skylines come with this anyway? I have a switch that I flick from left to right and my mirrors open up. Isn't that standard?

Hi mate, fair question. True, the switches move the mirrors in and out. But the controller basically does everything automatically. so you don't need to flick any switches. Plus you get the benefit of folding the mirrors in while the car is off. A stock skyline doesn't do this because the mirrors run off Accessory power.

I still have some if anyone is interested. $30 + P/A

-Tom

  • 10 months later...

Hi there mate,

Bit of a long shot, but do you still have anymore/able to make any more? Am dead set on getting one, I live in New Zealand but am happy to pay for shipping over here if you are able to. Thanks very much!

Dan

  • 6 months later...

Hey,

to quote exactly above ^^ any chance of getting one of these? Im in perth but have been looking for an easy solution for this "auto folding" feature for a while now.

Cheers ;)

Hi mate, no problems. $30 + $10 P&H should cover it. PM if you want one! Cheers -Tom

Hi there mate,

Bit of a long shot, but do you still have anymore/able to make any more? Am dead set on getting one, I live in New Zealand but am happy to pay for shipping over here if you are able to. Thanks very much!

Dan

Hi Dan, sorry I wasn't sure if I'd responded. If you're still interested, PM your Location in NZ and I'll get you a quote for the postage. Cheers -Tom

  • 2 years later...

Hi all, still have a few left. PM if interested. Cheers

Sorry if the info is somewhere in this thread, but are they hard to install? I'd be interested in one for a s2 r33 if it makes any difference which series.

Cheers,

Chris

  • 4 weeks later...

Sorry if the info is somewhere in this thread, but are they hard to install? I'd be interested in one for a s2 r33 if it makes any difference which series.

Cheers,

Chris

Not hard to install at all. Just need side cutters, soldering iron, PVC tape etc. Instructions are pretty straight forward and easy to follow. PM if interested.

Cheers

Tom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...