Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm going to throw this out from left field and suggest a brand new Hyundai Getz.

It won't pass your "not girly" requirements, but it ticks all the other boxes. It's light on fuel (official 6.1L/100km rating). It'll be new so no idiot's driven it into the ground, which will help with reliability (as will the warranty).

The car has the full plethora of safety features (ABS, ESP) which is good in a daily, especially if you let people who can't drive that well borrow it. The head unit plays MP3s off CD or a USB drive, and has a Bluetooth handsfree kit. Importantly, it has air con.

My girlfriend's work has one as a runabout. The seats are pretty hard and the plastics are bin-like, but aside from that its not that bad as something to just drive for a while and sell in a few years.

The other issue is that the 5 door RRPs at $15K drive away ($13K if you go 3 door), but you might be able to talk them down. It's above your $10K limit, but all the mod-cons and the lack of headaches from not being pre-abused by some idiot might offset that extra cost in your mind.

P.S. I don't work for Hyundai. :P

Getz_Brochure.pdf

Edited by scathing

a friend just bought a subaru liberty (2001, 2.5L engine, manual, ~140,000kms) for $12k. Fuel efficiency is decent if talking it easy but the best bit about is it's handling and with AWD, it grips quite well but the suspension is still conformable for a daily. plus, its no snail like most small cars, so can be a bit of fun at least compared to new corollas ect.

haven't been in many other cars that i would recommend buying for a daily :thumbsup:

^a friend owns an old hyundai excel, after driving it, i was happy im stuck with a VN.

Edited by Peter89

why are so many people recommending cars like mazdas that are so expensive to service? if you want a cheap to run daily the guy with the getz idea is on the money - however there's like 800 bucks gross profit in those cars so good luck getting a serious discount. a 3 or 4 k corolla is a great idea as they won't cost you anything to look after - and a later model magna tj for example is great value for money.

why are so many people recommending cars like mazdas that are so expensive to service? if you want a cheap to run daily the guy with the getz idea is on the money - however there's like 800 bucks gross profit in those cars so good luck getting a serious discount. a 3 or 4 k corolla is a great idea as they won't cost you anything to look after - and a later model magna tj for example is great value for money.

same goes for hondas, that and they look shit.

I was looking at a daily also, mainly just for going to station, and places where I would otherwise not park etc. I dont care what it looks like etc ONLY that it is cheap and has working a/c.

The best option I came up with was a Toyota Startlet... based on what they are selling for I could easily get one for $3k and being a 1.3 they sip petrol. That is for a car that is about 10 years old and has a drivers airbag, a/c and power steer.

Only thing that annoys me is paying 2 sets of rego and 2 sets of insurance and 2 sets of maintenance which would be about $1k a year for a starlet I would say.

Not too bad a price though for the added convienience

Edited by r32line

I bought a Swift GTi as a daily runabout.

Like you say, the 1.3L sips petrol and being so small its easy to park. Mine doesn't have air con but they did sell some that do.

It's also a shitload of fun to drive.

The reason I didn't suggest it is because its old and, being a "desirable" hot hatch, will come pre-thrashed.

Edited by scathing

SR NA Silvia, great on fuel and to smash around.

They hold their value aswell as so many p platers want them, I had one bought it for $5000 added a 2nd hand nissan aero kit (painted and fitted myself) kept it for 5 months sold it for $8500 in 2 weeks, no shit.

It was manual tho

Edited by Silvia GTR
actually, a TJ series magna would be the pick.

smooth 3.5l v6, better build quality than local products.

BUT, my bluebird is for sale! lol

the magnas are a local product and build quality isn't that great. not bad, but not great. no worse than any other aussie made car, but not better either.

also they aren't the most economical car either. they are quick in manual form though. i have owned 2 TH magnas. both 3.5L manuals. they are the same as a TJ, just different vody shape but built off the same platform (basically just different nose and tail) and they are ok cars. my second one ran a 14.8 at willowbank with just a catback exhaust. on the highway the economy is good. you can get around 8-9L/100kms pretty easily. round town though they are heavy on fuel. even babying it i was getting around 13L/100km. if you drive a bit harder that will jump up to 16L/100kms very quickly.

I would have suggested a N15 Pulsar SSS but they are a bit long in the tooth, and Nissan build quality isn't fantastic. They did come standard with everything you'd need in a daily (air con, power windows/mirrors) and the SR20DE isn't a bad motor. Any Nissan hatch after the N15 isn't even worth considering.

i have one of these and love it. build quality is good, no different to any other nissan (for example a skyline). they run cheap (on the highway i've had a best of 6.5L/100kms) and some spirited driving round town will see me at 12L/100kms as worst figures. generally just over 10l/100kms, but if i lived in a different area and was driving further to work (and doing less short trips on cold start enrichment) i would easily get under 10L/100kms. in fact towing a 3.6m tinny on the highway i still get under 10l/100kms.

i would highly recommend the n15 SSS. they are comfy to drive, go well, and even better with some mods (full exhaust, not just cat back. extractors make a big difference to the top end) and are economical, and much nicer to drive than a corolla or lancer, etc. the old girl has a base model 2000 model corolla and it is terrible to drive compare to the pulsar. it goes ok but is too soft in the suspension. lancers are the same. and you can pick some up with low kms on them still (under 100,000kms) which isn't bad for a 10 year old car.

i don't know if i'd go with a subaru. i've driven a 2.0L imprezza and a 2.5L liberty and while they go ok, i would still take the pulsar over them.

i have one of these and love it.

I used to have one. I loved it and it always ran without missing a beat, but the interior trim was very rattly and it was squeaking in a fair few places.

build quality is(...)no different to any other nissan

Yep, that's what I said. Pretty average build quality.

Most Nissans I've been in have rattled and squeaked, most straight off the dealership floor. The bits that make it stop, turn and go are generally bulletproof but everything else feels like its not quite firmly attached.

Those characteristics are fine in a fun sporty car, but not as desirable in a daily runabout.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok gotcha, so one post to fpr  another to bov  and I have the mishimoto boost controller and a link g4+ so I’d just have the tuner set it up properly. For the last two from plenum post throttle to  ecu/ boost controller, I know that I have a hose coming from the ecu that I was confused about so I assume that’s what connect to the boost controller from the ecu? And then the last is just from plenum to boost controller then to wastegate?
    • From there, it was just a quick electrical check, prime the oil and start her up Which, is not what happened. 1. Bloody seppo Aeropro battery holder. Not only was it too tall for the battery (which I'll forgive them for, I have another battery the same nominal size that is taller than Neil's one, but the bracket is a fixed height so the battery was spaced up) But the thing that really shits me is the hardware to hold it on requires a 7/32 Hex key. WTF. No-one will ever be able to remove or install the damn thing without a hex key they don't own 2. Kill switch no longer worked once the console was installed. Neil mentioned above he had to adjust the length but it no longer cleared the console once installed. Sorted. 3. Suspiciously, the brake light holders were hanging in the boot with no globes. Sure enough the stopper on the brake pedal was missing so they are always on unless the kill switch is activated. Will pick one up tomorrow (turns out 32 and 33 don't use the same stopper) 4. All that sorted, I turned on the kill switch, turned the key to ACC. Nothing. Turned it to IGN. Nothing. Checked some fuses and found the main IGN in the boot was missing which improved things once it was replaced. Now ECU and dash lights turn on with IGN but still no fuel pump. 5. Turned it to Start....ECU on, no fuel pump, no starter. Plus the voltage dropped straight to 9v.  I suspect the starter is f**ked but am going to have to work through it all and see what is happening, really looks like more than one issue. Does anyone have the R33 fuse box key with the circuit it sources from (eg BAT, ACC, IGN, SRT etc) and supplies? I can find a translated list showing Amps and circuit without supply circuit, and I can find supply circuit without Amps and target circuit.
    • 3rd time lucky, the AAC is now all plumbed up after getting some final fittings All set up under the plenum of maximum access
    • OK, so the weight has been bugging because it was really low. I did it again today and got a more believable answer at 1246 without driver And with a 93kg driver I'm pretty sure the car was still slightly on the quickjack last time meaning the full weight was not on the scales  
×
×
  • Create New...