Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There's still only one servo to get it from in NSW... kind of limiting.

Ye same for us :down:

I never saw PULP mentioned before you, Nismoid - I thought E85 is pump gas in Oz these days, too? It is showing up a lot around the world....

Well 700cc injectors gives it away, you'd need 1000cc or bigger using E85 :)

There is only a couple of servo's in Melb.

To give you an idea... The closest to me (and i live basically in the city), is 30mins drive one way.

If some one says they want a certain amount of power, i think we need to assume it is on 98 octane. It is a bit pointless telling some one they can make the power on "x" turbo, they go an buy it, try to make the power and can't. Then when they come back you say "oh sorry, i ment it would make that power on C16, E85, Nitrous..." etc.

I also wouldn't classify E85 as pump gas in Oz.

Couldn't agree more.

E85 is like saying you made that power on C16 - utterly irrelevant for most people being you can't get E85 anywhere in most states.

and that is that...

Maybe you should read the first post then?

700cc injectors

i want a single top mounted turbo and want to make 350rwk

700cc injectors should manage it on e85...

but either way i agree with pm-r33, when people ask for a power figure, its PULP unless otherwise stated...

Fair enough, I wasn't sure if E85 was quickly becoming the new premium or not - I'd imagine if it came out here we'd all be getting tuned on it. I know everyone who has access to E10 here are doing so :down:

It was meant to spread to heaps of servo's here in Melb really quickly... this was around 12 months ago for Melb.

Since then not ONE of the servo's marked for E85 have started stocking it yet. Just the original few... So something serious must be going on to stop this becoming more widespread as it is a massive money maker. Few discussions with friends etc we roughly think its more profitable than PULP so why a company wouldn't adopt a more profitable product must mean there are issues.

Either way - assumption always is PULP. We've never assumed it was C16, Sunoco104 or anything else in the past... to magically start now is silly.

Slightly different, E85 costs less than PULP per litre and officially could be available from the pump... so quite different from race gas. But yeah I get what you are saying.

I find it interesting that no one over there has managed to get more than 320-330kw @ wheels out of one on pump gas, though I am not sure exactly how harsh your dynos are. In the states there are people who have done around 350kw or so on PULP on Dynojet rolling roads and Dynapacks. Either way, I'd call a GT3582R more suitable for 350kw @ wheels on a drift car - you're going to be in high revs most of the time anyway, surely?

Slightly different, E85 costs less than PULP per litre and officially could be available from the pump... so quite different from race gas. But yeah I get what you are saying.

I find it interesting that no one over there has managed to get more than 320-330kw @ wheels out of one on pump gas, though I am not sure exactly how harsh your dynos are. In the states there are people who have done around 350kw or so on PULP on Dynojet rolling roads and Dynapacks. Either way, I'd call a GT3582R more suitable for 350kw @ wheels on a drift car - you're going to be in high revs most of the time anyway, surely?

dyno jets read quite high and ive noticed the us guys tend to qoute flywheel power when using dynapacks (they use the TC factor caculator)

The issue with E85 seems to be the storage tanks,no one wants to cough up for the required tanks and subsequent regs etc..

Out of curiosity what car is this RB26 going to be in ? I'm guessing a GTR wouldn't be such a good drift car ?

Probably the real thing to to know is what is "adequate" power output because if 350 is too much sizing a turbo to suit is a little pointless .

Now I know nothing about drift but if I again had to guess I'd think real strong mid range torque with good throttle and boost response - to the hoof - would be everything .

I'm thinking the "burning" question should be how much torque and how accurately can it be modulated .

Not my money but would an RB25 with a supercharger be simpler/cheaper ?

A .

Out of curiosity what car is this RB26 going to be in ? I'm guessing a GTR wouldn't be such a good drift car ?

Probably the real thing to to know is what is "adequate" power output because if 350 is too much sizing a turbo to suit is a little pointless .

Now I know nothing about drift but if I again had to guess I'd think real strong mid range torque with good throttle and boost response - to the hoof - would be everything .

I'm thinking the "burning" question should be how much torque and how accurately can it be modulated .

Not my money but would an RB25 with a supercharger be simpler/cheaper ?

A .

superchargers generally suck unfortunaly we do alot of superchargers on v8's and so forth and it is suprising how laggy most of the popular ones are.. makes a T51R look responsive :down:

typical boost curve for a charger --- >

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/po...boost-curve.jpg

Thread with a few graphs ive posted ----> http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fi...66#entry4561766

A properly setup charger (900nm @ 3000rpm :) ) ----> post-a220072-mallo-charged.jpg

Edited by URAS
dyno jets read quite high and ive noticed the us guys tend to qoute flywheel power when using dynapacks (they use the TC factor caculator)

The issue with E85 seems to be the storage tanks,no one wants to cough up for the required tanks and subsequent regs etc..

Yes Trent is right!

The issue with E85 is the cost of the replacement tank lining. I was told it costs 40 GRAND per tank upgrade so as you can imagine who is going to spent that kinda cash on a upgrade that will not return the money for at least 5 - 10 years ?

It is also a legal requirement to have this upgrade to be able to stock E85.

Wait till holden brings out E85 flex. Things will change very fast.

My RB30DET ran out of injectors with Nismo 740cc at around 345 - 350 rwkw (mainline dyno)

There is plenty of info on my E85 thread about this stuff.... worth the read.

Yep :P

Fact. A GT3076 will not make 350rwkw on PULP. Nor will it make 360rwkw, or 374rwkw on PULP.

Fact. You will not make 350rwkw on E85 with 700cc injectors, nor will you make 360rwkw, or 374rwkw with those injectors.

Fact. A GT35 will do make 350rwkw on PULP with 700cc injectors, which is the question that was asked.

It's not the 'most responsive' option, but that power goal is in a little bit of no-mans land. However if you are drifting, the first 3500rpm of a tacho is rather pointless anyway.

Overall it's laughable to think E85 results (a specialist fuel no different to C16 at this stage, if anything C16 is EASIER to source) were brought into this thread just to try and backup incorrect facts...

And then try and call 'ignorance' :)

Shows how ignorant those with the incorrect facts really are.

lol

just to prove your "facts" wrong... i cant wait till conan7772 gets bigger injectors, pumps a extra 1-2psi into the motor and makes the extra whole 13rwkw to make 350rwkw on pump fuel no less

Guilt-Toys car was making 345-350rwkw with Nismo 740cc's on e85 bump the fuel pressure a little with a reg and you will make more with 700cc's

Noone said that 35R's will not make the power...

Edited by Cerbera

I could make 360rwkw from GT-SS's if i want, doesn't make it true though does it?

From page one incase you've forgotten it, again. :P

I couldn't care less what a dyno says until there is some real proof to back that up.

Of which, as usual, there is ... zero.

But then you do love your arguments without real evidence :P

Lemme know when you have the evidence, i suspect though... we'll never see it.

A GT3076 isn't going to make 350rwkw in a .82

Al has maxed his out @ 306rwkw or there abouts.

That is a solid 50rwkw shy really...

NYTSKY made 362rwkw with a 3076R and Denzo just made 374rwkw the other day...

your ignorance is always bliss

I couldn't care less what a dyno says until there is some real proof to back that up.

Of which, as usual, there is ... zero.

But then you do love your arguments without real evidence :P

Oh i see it is E85 - well that comes as little surprise, everyone seems to make a solid 40-50rwkw when changing from PULP (which everybody has access too), to E85 (which a lot of people do not)

It is not PULP 360rwkw...

There is no way the OP is going to make 360rwkw on E85 with 700c injectors, so he is clearly talking about PULP.

So its still back to exactly what i said, seems im not as ignorant as you are silly to put E85 results into a PULP thread... but that is fairly typical of you. :P

epic lol...

r31nismoid: 3076R is not going to make 350rwkw

cerbera: here are 2 that made more than 350rwkw

r31nismoid: i dont believe you, therefore your wrong

r31nismoid: *finds out he is wrong" epic backpedal and changes topic to e85

Edited by Cerbera

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I understand your sarcastic exasperation. But to be fair - the baffles do indeed fit OEM cam covers. They did omit to say that you need to do a bunch of stuff. But they do fit them.
    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam cap bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
×
×
  • Create New...